:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:What Is Patent English?
書刊名:Journal of English Education
作者:Chen, Ping-hsun
出版日期:2012
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁45-55
主題關鍵詞:PatentPatent attorneyPatent EnglishPatentability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
The patent system was created to encourage innovation by granting to an inventor an exclusive right to stop others from using her inventions. The system requires an inventor to submit an application to the governmental agency which, in Taiwan, isthe Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. To file a patent application, the applicant might need a specialist who is presumed to acquire the knowledge of paten prosecution and patent law. To become a patent specialist, a person has to pass the patent attor ney bar exam. Among the tested subjects is ―Patent English.‖ The goal of the ―Patent English‖ subject is to examine the language ability of a testtaker to provide patent prosecution services in scussed well. This paper intends to elaborate the content of Patent English. First, the questions tested in the patent attorney bar exam are reviewed to figure out the governmental view regarding Patent English. It is found that the bar exam not only tests English vocabulary used in the patent law but also tests general knowledge about intellectual property issues. Second, this paper analyzes the course of patent prosecution. Three circumstances exist when the English ability is needed. The first circumstance is that a patent attorney might assist foreign applicants to file a patent application. The second circumstance is that a patent attorney might work with foreign patent agents to help Taiwanese clients file a patent applicant in a foreign country, which requires a communication skill in English and a reading skill for analyzing official opinions from foreign patent offices. The third circumstance is that a patent attorney might provide professional opinions about global patent filing strategies to her client, which requires the knowledge or terminologies of patent law. Particularly, she needs to know the American patent law because it influences many countries’ patent laws. This paper concludes that Patent English covers the knowledge of the American pate nt law, business writing skill in English, and essay writing skill in English.
期刊論文
1.Albanesius, C.(20111219)。ITC bans import of HTC Android devices in Apple patent fight。PC Magazine。  new window
2.Cotropia, C. A.(2009)。Modernizing patent law's inequitable conduct doctrine。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,24,273-783。  new window
3.Garcia, J.(2007)。Fighting biopiracy: The legislative protection of traditional knowledge。Berkeley La Raza Law Journal,18,5-27。  new window
4.McFarland, I. G.(2011)。In the wake of Therasense & Nisus Corp., how can patent attorneys defend themselves against allegations of inequitable conduct?。Tennessee Law Review,78,487-530。  new window
會議論文
1.Chen, P. H.(2011)。A methodology of analyzing American patent law cases for non-American-trained lawyers。2011 International Conference and Workshop on English for Specific Purposes,(會議日期: 2011/10/27-10/29)。Taichung City。132-143。  new window
2.Liu, C. K.(2011)。A useful framework for ESP classes: A case study of project-based language learning program。2011 International Conference and Workshop on English for Specific Purposes,(會議日期: 2011/10/27-10/29)。Taichung City。163-171。  new window
圖書
1.United States Patent and Trademark Office(2010)。General information concerning patents。Virginia:USPTO。  new window
2.McKinney, R. A.(2005)。Reading like a lawyer: time-saving strategies for reading law like an expert。North Carolina:Carolina Academic Press。  new window
3.Basturkmen, H.(2006)。Ideas and options in English for Specific Purposes。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
4.Charles Sturt University(2008)。Business and report writing skills。New South Wales, Victoria:Charles Sturt University。  new window
5.Chen, Y.-S.、Hsueh, H.-Y.、Li, M.-J.、Hu, C.-S.、Kennedy, B.(2005)。Taiwan's international status: History and theory。New Taipei City:Taiwan Advocates。  new window
6.Dudley-Evans, T.、St. John, M. J.(1998)。Developments in English for Specific Purposes。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.LeClercq, T.(2007)。Guide to legal writing style。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
8.Merges, R. P.、Menell, P. S.、Lemley, M. A.(2006)。Intellectual property in the new technological age。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
9.Ministry of Examination, Examination Yuan(2008)。Exam paper: Patent English。Taipei City:Ministry of Examination。  new window
10.Ministry of Examination, Examination Yuan(2009)。Exam paper: Patent English。Taipei City:Ministry of Examination。  new window
11.Ministry of Examination, Examination Yuan(2010)。Exam paper: Patent English。Taipei City:Ministry of Examination。  new window
12.Nedzel, Nadia E.(2008)。Legal reasoning, research, and writing for international graduate students。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
13.McManis, Charles R.(2004)。Intellectual Property and unfair competition。West。  new window
14.Chisum, D. S.、Nard, C. A.、Schwartz, H. F.、Newman, P.、Kieff, F. S.(2004)。Principles of Patent Law。New York:Foundation Press。  new window
其他
1.Patent Act of Taiwan (official translation),http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0070007, 2012/02/09。  new window
2.United States Patent and Trademark Office(2010)。402 Power of attorney; Acting in a representative capacity [R-5],http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/0400_402.htm#sect402, 2012/02/10。  new window
3.Hsu, A.(20110823)。Taiwan, US fast track patent application process,http://taiwantoday.tw/ct.asp?xItem=174500&CtNode=436。  new window
4.Jim, C.,Gupta, P.(20111220)。Apple scores limited victory in smartphone patent war,http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/20/us-htc-apple-patent-idUSTRE7BI24620111220。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE