:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:五代永明延壽的佛教詮釋理論--隋唐「判教」的繼承及其解構
書刊名:臺北大學中文學報
作者:柳幹康
作者(外文):Yanagi, Mikiyasu
出版日期:2016
卷期:19
頁次:頁127-152
主題關鍵詞:判教圭峰宗密永明延壽宗鏡錄一心Doctrinal classificationGuifeng ZongmiYongming YanshouZongjingluOne mind
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:22
本文主要探討永明延壽(904-976)如何繼承隋唐之「判教」並建立了自己的佛教詮釋理論。古印度成立的諸多佛經本來異見紛呈,在漢末卻作為同一種「佛說」傳入中國,由此產生了詮釋佛經的必要性。隋唐時期許多僧人依據自己理解的「佛意」將佛經分類,試圖以此理解整個佛說。將佛說分為數個層次的詮釋理論,歷史上稱之為「判教」。中唐宗密(780-841)將其判教範圍擴大至新興的禪宗,但以分類為主的做法,與之前的判教體系並無二致。五代永明延壽從「以心為宗」的禪宗立場出發,一方面其「未入者」(未悟人)的看法,繼承了宗密及其之前的判教理論;另一方面其導入的「上上機」的觀點,則提出了與前此截然不同的佛教詮釋法。延壽認為,所有經典雖文字有別,然其所示對象(所詮)無非「一心」。由此,他認為最重要的並非經典分類,而是看破「一心」,而所謂「上上機」正是得見此種「一心」的根機。由之,延壽之前的判教都失去了原有意義,被吸納至延壽全新的佛教詮釋理論之中了。
This paper will discuss how Yongming Yanshou 永明延壽 (904-976) inherited the logic of panjiao 判教 (doctrinal classification) from the Buddhism of the Sui and Tang period, and established his own Buddhist hermeneutic framework upon it. Although the Buddhist scriptures created in India include a variety of different teachings and theories, because all these had been transmitted to China as "the word of the Buddha," by the end of the later Han period, Buddhist exegetes felt a need to interpret these all as part of a uniform system. By the Sui and Tang period, to create a uniform interpretation of the whole of the Buddha's teachings, many monks classified Buddhist scriptures based on their own understanding of "the Buddha's intention" (foyi 佛意). This method of interpretation, whereby the Buddha's teachings are classified into multiple levels, is known as "panjiao"判教, a term usually translated as "doctrinal classification." Although Zongmi 宗密 (780-841), a monk of the mid-Tang period, added the new and influential Chan (Zen) school to his purview of his analysis, panjiao remained principally a method to classify Buddhist texts. Later, during the Five Dynasties period (907-960), the Chan monk Yongming Yanshou developed his own doctrinal classification system based on the Chan school's point of view "taking the mind as the basis" (yi xin wei zong 以心為宗). On one hand, Yanshou's system carries on the tradition of inhered from Zongmi and his predecessors in describing how the weiruzhe 未入者 (person who has not yet entered [enlightenment]) sees the world, on the other hand, he presents an entirely new and different method for interpreting Buddhism in describing how the shangshangji 上上機 ([person with] the utmost conditions [for attaining enlightenment]) sees the world. Yanshou believed that for all of the Buddhist scriptures, although they differ in terms of language, they all have the same referent (suoquan 所詮), that is the "one mind" (yixin 一心). Because of this, the most important thing for Yanshou was not the classification of scriptures, per se, but the realization of this "one mind." Yanshou's shangshangji 上上機, therefore, referred to people who were able realize this "one mind." In this way, the original purpose of prior panjiao systems, that is to say, the classification of particular scriptures and teachings, is missing from Yanshou's system and is instead absorbed into this entirely new Buddhist hermeneutic.
期刊論文
1.小川隆(1998)。宗密傳法世系再考。禪文化研究所紀要,24,67-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.本庄良文(2011)。經の文言と宗義:部派佛教から『選擇集』へ。日本佛教學會年報,76,109-125。  延伸查詢new window
3.吉村誠(2005)。基の三轉法輪說の解釋について。印度學佛教學研究,53(2),213-218。  延伸查詢new window
4.吉津宜英(1981)。華嚴教判論の展開:均如の主張する頓圓一乘をめぐって。駒澤大學佛教學部研究紀要,39,195-225。  延伸查詢new window
5.池田魯參(1972)。五時八教論:關口說と問題點。駒澤大學佛教學部論集,3,51-66。  延伸查詢new window
6.池田魯參(1973)。天台學における五時八教論:再び關口說を論駁す。曹洞宗研究員研究生研究紀要,6,14-26。  延伸查詢new window
7.金東淑(2011)。小考《宗鏡錄》中的"禪教一致"思想。五台山研究,107,19-24。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊文斌(2009)。延壽、宗密"禪教合一"論的差異。安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版),33(2),37-43。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王翠玲(2000)。永明延壽の研究:『宗鏡錄』を中心として(博士論文)。東京大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.荒木見悟(1993)。新版佛教と儒教(-),東京。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃繹勳(1994)。「觀心與成佛」:永明延壽《觀心玄樞》第二問的研究(碩士論文)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.佐藤哲英(1981)。續天台大師の研究:天台智顗をめぐる諸問題。京都:百華苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.柳田聖山(2000)。初期禪宗史書の研究。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
3.高峰了州(1976)。華嚴論集。東京:國書刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
4.曾其海(1999)。天台佛學。上海:學林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.吉津宜英(1991)。華嚴一乘思想の研究。東京:大東出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.安藤俊雄(1968)。天台學:根本思想とその展開。京都:平樂寺書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.木村宣彰(2009)。中國佛教思想研究。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
8.冉雲華(1998)。宗密。臺北:東大圖書。  延伸查詢new window
9.田青青(2010)。永明延壽心學研究。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.石井修道(1992)。禪語錄。東京:中央公論社。  延伸查詢new window
11.吉村誠(2013)。中国唯識思想史研究:玄奘と唯識学派。東京:大藏。  延伸查詢new window
12.吉津宜英(1985)。學術叢書・禪佛教《華嚴禪の思想史的研究》。東京:大東出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.柳幹康(2015)。永明延寿と『宗鏡録』の研究--一心による中国仏教の再編。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
14.深浦正文(1954)。唯識學研究.下卷.教義論。京都:永田文昌堂。  延伸查詢new window
15.菅野博史(1995)。法華玄義。東京:第三文明社。  延伸查詢new window
16.菅野博史(2012)。南北朝・隋代の中國佛教思想研究。東京:大藏。  延伸查詢new window
17.湯次了榮(1923)。華嚴大系。京都:龍谷大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊文斌(2011)。一心與圓教:永明延壽思想研究。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
19.鍵主良敬、木村清孝(1991)。人物中国の仏教法藏。東京:大藏。  延伸查詢new window
20.鐮田茂雄(1975)。宗密教學の思想史的研究:中國華嚴思想史の研究第二。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
21.屈大成(20000000)。中國佛教思想中的頓漸觀念。臺北:文津。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.廖明活(20060000)。中國佛教思想述要。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.忽滑谷快天(1923)。禪學思想史。東京:玄黃社。  延伸查詢new window
24.冉雲華(1999)。永明延壽。台北:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.呂澄(1979)。中國佛學源流略講。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.王鳳珠(2007)。永明禪師禪淨融合思想研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.石井修道(1997)。宗密と延壽。華嚴學論集。東京:大藏。  延伸查詢new window
2.池田魯參。五時八教論:關口說と問題點。天台教學の研究。東京:大東出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.池田魯參。天台學における五時八教論:再び關口說を論駁す。天台教學の研究。東京:大東出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋道發(2005)。從宗密的禪教一致論到延壽的禪教融合論:禪教合一思想源流述略。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.金東淑(2009)。《宗鏡錄》的"禪教一致"思想。佛學與國學:樓宇烈教授七秩晉五頌壽文集。北京:九州出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.菅野博史(1995)。東アジア佛教の經典觀:中國を中心として。東アジア佛教とは何か。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
7.董群(2005)。延壽對宗密禪教融合論思想的繼承和發展。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.橫超慧日(1961)。教相判釋の原始形態:鳩摩羅什とその弟子をめぐって。佛教史學論集:塚本博士頌壽記念。京都:塚本博士頌壽記念會。  延伸查詢new window
9.藤井淳(2011)。中國における教判の形成と展開。大乘佛教とは何か。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
10.鐮田茂雄(1975)。圭峰宗密の教判論。佛教研究論集。大阪:清文堂。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE