:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:因應《巴黎協定》的氣候戰略思維與行動
書刊名:戰略與評估
作者:王漢國
作者(外文):Wang, Han-kuo
出版日期:2015
卷期:6:4
頁次:頁43-66
主題關鍵詞:巴黎協定氣候戰略溫減法低碳社會減緩與調適Paris AgreementClimate strategySubtraction temperatureLow-carbon societyMitigation and adaptation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
2015年11月30日,在巴黎舉行的「聯合國氣候變遷綱要公約」(UNFCCC)第21次締約國大會(Conference of Parties,簡稱COP21),歷經14天馬拉松式的談判之後,終於促成了《巴黎協定》草案的誕生,該協定將成為2020年後唯一具備法律約束力的全球氣候規範。 本文主要探討下列三個問題:一、在世人高度期待之下,2015年COP21的《巴黎協定》草案對於緩和全球氣候暖化能起著哪些積極作用?二、根據《巴黎協定》草案的結論,做為「非締約方利害關係人」的參與者,我國雖已主動宣示自主貢獻報告,但未來如何強化各相關法制的約束力,以降低高居不下的排碳量?三、當「氣候戰略」(climate strategy)已成為全球新世紀的安全主軸之際,我國又應如何加強政府部門間、政府與企業間的協力合作,來共同因應極端氣候的威脅? 在研究結論上,筆者提出四點建議:一、強化政府權責機構之間的「網絡連結」,加強「氣候戰略」的規劃與設計,俾利「低碳社會」目標達成。二、強化《溫減法》與《能源管理法》、《再生能源發展條例》及《能源稅條例(草案)》彼此連結,以提高法制規範的約束力。三、在建構「低碳社會」的氣候戰略上,應將重點置於減碳及調適策略的可行性分析,採多案比較,擇優選取,並盡可能與國際接軌。四、在因應危機的「氣候戰略」作為上,必須改變國人過去對「碳基燃料」的過度依賴,或對「補償性回饋」的不當期待心理。
November 30, 2015, held in Paris, “the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change” (UNFCCC) 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21), after 14 days marathon negotiations, finally led to the “Paris Agreement”, which would become the only legally binding post-2020 global climate norm. Basically, this paper focuses on the following three issues: (A) As anticipated, the draft of “Paris Agreement” in 2015 for COP21 mitigate global warming which can play a positive role? (B) According to the draft conclusions of the “Paris Agreement”, as “non-Parties interested party” participants in the initiative to declare autonomy. Although our contribution to the report, but the future is how to strengthen the binding of the relevant legal system, to reduce the stubbornly high carbon emissions?(C)When the “climate strategy” has become the new global security spindle occasion century, Taiwan and how to strengthen inter-governmental departments work, and joint government and enterprises to cope with threat of extreme weather? On conclusion of the study, the Author puts forward four-point proposal: (A) Strengthen “the network between the government agency and responsibility link” to strengthen the planning and design of "climate strategy", and achieve a "Low Carbon Society" goals. (B) Strengthen the “Warm Subtraction” and “Energy Management Law”, Renewable “Energy Development Act” and the “Energy Tax Ordinance (draft)” link to each other, in order to improve the binding legal norms. (C) On the construction of “low-carbon society” climate strategy, feasibility analysis should focus placed on carbon reduction and adaptation strategies, adopted more comparative case, merit-based selection, and as far as possible with international standards. (D) In response to the crisis, the people must change the past, “carbon-based fuels” over-reliance, or “compensatory reward” improper psychological expectations.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE