:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從《古今詞統》選詞論稼軒在明代詞壇之地位
書刊名:東吳中文學報
作者:蘇淑芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Su, Shu-fen
出版日期:2016
卷期:31
頁次:頁159-188
主題關鍵詞:明詞稼軒古今詞統Ming CiJiaxuancGujin Citong
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:7
明人一向以詞為末流小道,且重言情。吳梅《詞學通論》指出:「論詞至明代,可謂中衰之期。」明初詞壇至成化年間,少人關注稼軒詞,「擬」、「和」、「次」韻稼軒詞者極少。弘治至嘉靖年間,陳霆《渚山堂詞話》、楊慎《詞品》、王世貞《藝苑卮言・詞評》,都有評論稼軒詞,而且還有模仿以及唱和稼軒詞。到明末萬曆、崇禎年間,因為國勢衰頹,詞人以詞宣洩幽悶,模仿稼軒豪放詞者更多。崇禎時由卓人月、徐士俊所編選的《古今詞統》,選稼軒詞遠多過蘇軾詞,歷來詞壇都是稱蘇、辛,此時稼軒詞突受關注,本論文即歸納其原因,稼軒詞一、更合音律,二、更詞能撫慰心靈,三、更能與艷詞相爭,四、能平衡豪放與婉約詞派,因而選稼軒詞更多,以提升稼軒在明詞壇地位。
People in the Ming dynasty usually take lyrics as unimportant in the literary field and deem it as a genre focused on feelings and emotions. Mei Wu’s Cixue Tonglun points out that lyrics were declining during the Ming dynasty. During the beginning of the Ming dynasty to the year of Cheng Hua, there were only few paying close attention to the Jiaxuan Ci and there were few imitating, harmonizing, and rhyming them, either. During the year of Hong Zhi to Jia Jing, Ting Chen’s Zhushan Tangcihua, Shen Yang’s Ci Pin, Shizhen Wang’s Yiyuan Zhiyan: Ciping all made critiques on Jiaxuan Ci; furthermore, they also imitated, harmonized, and sang it. When it was the end of the Ming dynasty in the year of Wanli and Chongzhen, lyrics-makers unleashed their inner pains and uneasiness through the lyrics, especially those lyrics which were bright and clear, for the power of the nation was decaying then. During the year of Chongzhen, Gujin Citong, which was edited by Shijun Xu and Renyue Zhuo, contained more Jiaxuan Ci than the Sushi Ci. Over the years, it was called "Su Xin" in the fields of lyrics. However, Jiaxuan Ci was suddenly payed much attention during this time. Thus, this study aims to discuss the reasons of this phenomena as the following: First, Jiaxuan Ci is much better in chorusing the tonality. Second, its lyrics can further conciliate people’s mind. Third, its lyrics can further compete with Yan Ci. Fourth, it can balance different lyric parties between the liberal, outspoken and the graceful, restrained. Thus, the collection of Jiaxuan Ci remains a lot to promote its lyrics position in the Ming dynasty.
期刊論文
1.張宏生(2005)。明清之際的詞譜反思與詞風演進。文藝研究,2005(4)。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄧長風(1992)。文學奇才卓人月的生平行狀。文學遺產,1992(6)。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉尊明(2010)。歷代詞人次韻辛棄疾詞的定量分析。黃岡師範學院學報,30(2),41-50。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙彥軍(2011)。徐士俊生平事蹟考略。文教資料,36。  延伸查詢new window
5.程繼紅(2007)。稼軒詞風中的明詞。浙江海洋學院學報,24(4)。  延伸查詢new window
6.程繼紅(2006)。《全明詞》對稼軒詞接受情況的調查分析。浙江海洋學院學報,23(1)。  延伸查詢new window
7.張宏生(2008)。楊慎詞學與《草堂詩餘》。南京師大學報(社會科學版),2008(2),128-135。  延伸查詢new window
8.張仲謀(2013)。論《古今詞統》的詞史建構。閩江學刊,2013(3)。  延伸查詢new window
9.唐先進(2007)。晚明詞中的稼軒風。重慶科技學院學報,2007(2),67-68。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫芳(2011)。楊慎貶謫後的生存狀態及複雜心態。四川師範大學學報,23-39。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡小林。論《古今詞統》與明末詞風的嬗變。襄樊學院文學院學報,109-111。  延伸查詢new window
12.岳淑珍(2011)。楊慎詞品論述。河南大學學報,51(4),111-116。  延伸查詢new window
13.姜秀麗、崔永鋒(2009)。陳霆詞品觀及豪邁激越的詞風。齊齊哈爾大學學報(哲學社會科學版),2009(5),77-78。  延伸查詢new window
14.岳淑珍(2011)。王世貞的詞學觀及其對明代詞學的影響。南京師範大學學報,2011(5),136-143。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭海濤(2009)。明代詞壇與詞風嬗變研究(博士論文)。陝西師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃彥達(2013)。稼軒詞接受史研究--以南宋至明末的詞論為範圍(碩士論文)。華梵大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱全成(2009)。蘇軾詞的接受與影響--從期待視野的角度觀之(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王雨容(2007)。明末清初詞人社集以及詞風嬗變(博士論文)。廣西師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葛渭君(2013)。詞話叢編補編。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.張仲謀(2013)。明代詞學通論。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.岳淑珍(2014)。明代詞學批評史。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王世貞(1983)。弇州山人四部稿。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞彥(1988)。爰園詞話。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊慎(1988)。詞品。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳水雲(2010)。唐宋詞在明末清初的接受。北京:北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳水雲(2006)。明清詞學研究史。武漢:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.余意(2009)。明代詞學之建構。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄧子勉(2011)。明詞話全編。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.屈興國(2013)。編詞話叢編二編。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.張廷玉(2005)。明史。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.王晫(2010)。霞舉堂集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.卓人月。蟾台集。  延伸查詢new window
15.卓發之(2000)。漉籬集。北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢允治、陳仁錫(2002)。類編箋釋草堂詩餘。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.茅暎(1998)。詞的。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.俞彥(1998)。俞少卿集。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.王世貞(1988)。藝苑卮言・詞評。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳霆(1989)。水南集。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳霆(1997)。水南稿。臺南:莊嚴文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.張仲謀(2002)。明詞史。人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.吳梅(2006)。詞學通論。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
24.趙尊嶽(1992)。明詞彙刊。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.卓人月、徐士俊、谷輝之(2000)。古今詞統。遼寧教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.吳訥(1998)。文章辨體序說。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.楊慎(1968)。升庵全集。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
28.陳霆(1988)。渚山堂詞話。臺北:新文豐出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.陶子珍(2003)。明代詞選研究。臺北:秀威資訊科技股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.朱麗霞(2005)。清代辛稼軒接受史。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
31.周明初、葉曄(2007)。全明詞補編。浙江大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
32.謝桃坊(2002)。中國詞學史。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
33.谷應泰(1985)。明史紀事本末。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
34.王世貞(1970)。弇州山人續稿。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
35.朱崇才(2010)。詞話叢編續編。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
36.饒宗頤、張璋(2004)。全明詞。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.劉勁松(2015)。明代詞論中的主情說。古代文學理論研究・中國文論的思想與智慧。上海:華東師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐士俊(2010)。雁樓集。清代詩文集彙編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top