:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小校長推動特色學校之歷程:微觀政治領導矩陣之探究
書刊名:教育學報
作者:陳幸仁 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hsin-jen
出版日期:2016
卷期:44:1
頁次:頁79-102
主題關鍵詞:特色學校微觀政治微觀政治領導矩陣學校領導Featured schoolMicropoliticsMicropolitical leadership matrixSchool leadership
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:147
  • 點閱點閱:24
台灣近年來經歷少子化對學校經營的衝擊,為了挽救部分學校面臨關閉的困境, 教育部推動中、小學發展學校特色的政策,藉以化危機為轉機。校長身為學校首席 領導人,自然成為推動特色學校的主要舵手。本研究試圖從微觀政治領導矩陣的理論 架構,分析校長在推動特色學校的過程中,利害關係人知覺其領導效能為何。研究 發現,威權領導容易令行政人員知覺校長專斷獨裁,但在教育改革浪潮下,有時卻是 不得不然的領導方式;校長採行敵對領導,傾向任用偏好或想法接近的成員擔任行政 主管,容易造成教師疏離甚至對立;催化領導是說服教師推動特色學校常用的領導 取向;而民主授權領導既尊重教師意見亦能提升同僚能力,又給人關懷並重視弱勢 學習,堪稱最佳的領導取向。
Recently, due to the low birth rate, a few schools are facing the situation of being “shut down.” In order to solve this crisis, Taiwan’s Ministry of Education has implemented the policy of “featured school.” The school principal is undoubtedly the key leader in carrying out this policy. This study attempted to analyze how the principal carried out this policy of featured school under the perspective of the theoretical framework of micropolitical leadership matrix. Research findings illustrated four aspects: (a) authoritative leadership would make school administrators perceive that the principal was dominant and autocratic; however, sometimes the principal had no choice but to adopt such a leadership style for implementing the new policy required by the education authorities; (b) adversarial leadership would show the principal’s favoritism toward those administrators appointed by him or her; this leadership style caused conflict or alienation among some colleagues; (c) facilitative leadership was a popular leadership style used by the principal to persuade teachers to implement the policy of featured school; (d) democratic/empowering leadership could be the best leadership style which respect teachers’ opinions and capabilities, and put emphasis on the learning of disadvantaged students.
期刊論文
1.Blase, J.(1993)。The micropolitics of effective school-based leadership: Teachers' perspectives。Educational Administration Quarterly,29(2),146-163。  new window
2.陳幸仁、許惠茹(20110000)。教師情緒政治之探究:臺灣一所國民中學之個案研究。Education Journal,39(1/2),157-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bacharach, S. B.、Mundell, B. L.(1993)。Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action。Educational Administration Quarterly,29(4),423-452。  new window
4.Starratt, Robert J.(1991)。Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership。Educational Administration Quarterly,27(2),185-202。  new window
5.林明地(19990800)。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。教育政策論壇,2(2),129-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.彭新強(19970600)。香港學校的管理改革:問責制度的重整。Education Journal,25(1),25-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳幸仁(20080500)。學校組織行為之微觀政治探究。教育理論與實踐學刊,17,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Chen, Hsin-Jen(2009)。Micropolitics of the staff meeting in a Taiwanese primary school。Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,35,21-38。  new window
9.Kelchtermans, Geert(1996)。Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots。Cambridge Journal of Education,26(3),307-323。  new window
10.黎萬紅、盧乃桂(20021200)。權力下放與教師的專業自主--港臺兩地教育改革的經驗與思考。教育研究集刊,48(4),53-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.葉連祺(20060200)。國中人員如何進行SWOT分析:採行整合關係取向的研究。教育政策論壇,9(1),117-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Ball, S. J.、Maroy, C.(2009)。School's logics of action as mediation and compromise between internal dynamics and external constraints pressures。Compare,39(1),99-112。  new window
13.林明地(20060500)。Nel Noddings關懷倫理學及其在學校領導的應用。教育政策論壇,9(2),101-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉文通(2006)。學校特色與特色學校。北縣教育,57,4-5。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳明清(1997)。發展學校特色的理念與做法。北縣教育,4,21-26。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳幸仁(2013)。微觀政治及其在學校領導之應用。教育學報,41(1/2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Reitzug, U. C.(1994)。A case study of empowering principal behavior。American Educational Research Journal,31(2),283-307。  new window
18.陳幸仁(20050800)。從全球化教改風潮論校長的因應策略:Giddens「結構-行動」理論之觀點。教育政策論壇,8(2),143-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.陳幸仁(20080900)。家長參與校務決策之微觀政治分析。國民教育研究學報,21,91-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳幸仁(20080300)。學校教師會運作之微觀政治分析:一所小學之個案研究。屏東教育大學學報. 教育類,30,23-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.吳清山、林天祐(20090600)。特色學校。教育資料與研究,88,145-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林志成(20101000)。特色學校經營活化的尋思、迷思與省思。教育研究,198,32-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Blasé, Jo、Blasé, Joseph(2002)。The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),6-44。  new window
24.Lindle, J. C.(1999)。What can the Study of Micropolitics Contribute to the Practice of Leadership in Reforming Schools?。School Leadership & Management,19(2),171-178。  new window
會議論文
1.張明輝(1997)。美國磁性學校計劃與中小學學校教育革新。磁性中學學術研討會。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。56-67。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊思偉(1997)。美國磁性學校制度的特質與問題--從學校選擇角度析論。磁性中學學術研討會。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。68-74。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2015)。教育統計2015。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝金青(2003)。家長式領導風格之檢驗--兩所國民小學之觀察研究報告 (計畫編號:NSC 91-2413-H-134-003)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.佘育盈(201007)。偏遠小校特色發展策略之研究--以屏東縣微風國小為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李榮安、麥肖玲、黃炳文(2005)。香港校本改革:前線的探索。香港:香港教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sernak, K.(1998)。School Leadership: Balancing Power with Caring。New York, NY:Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
3.Woods, P. A.(2005)。Democratic leadership in education。Paul Chapman Publishing。  new window
4.Blasé, Joseph、Blasé, Jo Roberts(1994)。Empowering teachers: What successful principals do。Corwin Press。  new window
5.Blase, Joseph、Anderson, Gary L.(1995)。The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment。Cassell Wellington House。  new window
6.Weber, M.、Gerth, H. H.、Mills, C. W.(1948)。From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
7.Blasé, Joseph(1991)。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, California:Sage。  new window
8.Hersey, P.、Blanchard, K. H.(1977)。Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resource。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
9.Ball, S. J.(1987)。The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization。London。  new window
10.Deal, Terrence E.、Peterson, Kent D.(1994)。The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in Schools。Jossey-Bass。  new window
其他
1.洪川雅(2015)。楊志良:每隔一代,人口減一半,http://www.ettoday.net/news/ 20150109/448804.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃炳文(2005)。教育改革與特色學校的建立。香港校本改革:前線的探索。香港:香港教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Greenfield, W. D. Jr.(1991)。The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
3.Hunter, C.(1980)。The politics of participation: with specific reference to teacher-pupil relationships。Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school。London:Croom Helm。  new window
4.Malen, B.(1995)。The micropolitics of education: mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school politics。The study of educational politics。Falmer Press。  new window
5.林天祐(2009)。學校特色發展的概念與理論。台北教育111學校經營手冊。台北:台北市教師研習中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳怡如(2014)。英國教育改革趨勢--新管理主義。英國教育。台北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
7.Blase, J.、Björk, L.(2009)。The micropolitics of educational change and reform: Cracking open the black box。Second international handbook of educational change。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
8.Boyd, W. L.(1991)。[The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation]Foreword。The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
9.Cameron, Kim S.、Quinn, Robert E.(1988)。Organizational Paradox and Transformation。Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management。Cambridge, MA:Ballinger Pub. Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE