資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.225.57.67)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Applying the Action Model/Change Model Schema in Planning the Learning Community Program in Taiwan
書刊名:
當代教育研究季刊
作者:
潘慧玲
/
陳惠次
作者(外文):
Pan, Wendy Hui-ling
/
Chen, Huey T.
出版日期:
2017
卷期:
25:1
頁次:
頁109-131
主題關鍵詞:
行動模式
;
改變模式
;
方案評鑑
;
學習領導
;
學習共同體
;
Action model
;
Change model
;
Program evaluation
;
Leadership for learning
;
Learning community
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:8
評鑑通常在促進方案改進的歷程中是最後一個步驟,評鑑結果可以提供方案計劃者與利害關係人了解方案缺失,以便在下一階段謀求改善。不過,近來在設計階段即運用評鑑工具與原則以改進方案計劃的歷程上,有日益繁增的興趣。在本文,我們討論了一個較為新近發展的評鑑工具-行動模式/改變模式,作為引導臺灣一項大型教育方案-學習領導下的學習共同體(簡稱學習共同體方案)的規劃,同時也作為評鑑架構之用。我們組織了工作小組會議發展學習共同體的行動模式/改變模式之圖式(schema)。在會議中,參與者討論了圖式中的要素、要素與方案的關連,以及從圖式的發展中所習得的經驗。而針對會議中蒐集的質性資料,採內容分析法進行分析。經過整個圖式發展的過程後,參與者表示行動模式/改變模式之圖式提供了一個討論與發展方案計畫的有效平台,激發了批判性思考,有助於確認方案的主要要素,且提供了評鑑設計一個整全性的引導。該圖式是一個較為新近發展的工具,能俾利評鑑者與利害關係人清楚描繪方案或設計方案,只是目前在少數發表的論文中僅見其應用於公共健康方案。故而,本研究所獲得的結果,一方面可提升教育與其他方案使用該圖式進行方案計劃與評鑑設計,另一方面對於未來在評鑑計劃工具的運用上,亦有鼓勵作用。
以文找文
Evaluation is often the final step in running social betterment programs. For improvement, evaluation findings inform program planners and stakeholders about program shortcomings. However, interest has recently grown in applying evaluation tools and principles to programs from the design stage, to improve planning. We discuss the application of a relatively new evaluation tool, the action model/change model schema, for guiding the planning of a large-scale education program, the Learning Community under Leadership for Learning (Learning Community Program) in Taiwan and serving as a framework for evaluation at the same time. We organized work-group meetings for the development of an action model/change model schema for the Learning Community Program. The participants discussed the components of the schema and how they related to the program, as well as the lessons learned from the experience of developing the schema. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative data collected during the work-group meetings. The participants indicated that the schema provided an effective platform for discussing and developing the program plan. The schema also stimulated critical thinking, helped identify the major components of the program, and provided a holistic guide for the evaluation design. The action model/change model schema is a relatively new tool used by evaluators to assist stakeholders in describing or designing a program more effectively. Few published articles discuss its applications in public health programs. This study investigated the application of the schema to an education program outside the United States. The lessons learned from this application can promote the schema as an effective tool for planning and designing the evaluation of education and other programs, as well as encourage the use of evaluation planning tools for strengthening program designs in the future.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
McLaughlin, J. A.、Jordan, G. B.(1999)。Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story。Evaluation and Program Planning,22(1),65-72。
2.
Pan, Hui-Ling Wendy(2014)。School practices of leading learning in Taiwan。Leading and Managing,20(2),27-42。
3.
Julian, D. A.、Jones, A.、Deyo, D.(1995)。Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools。Evaluation and Program Planning,18(4),333-341。
4.
Kaplan, S. A.、Garrett, K. E.(2005)。The use of logic models by community-based initiatives。Evaluation and Program Planning,28(2),167-172。
5.
Marsh, S.、Waniganayake, M.、Gibson, I. W.(2014)。Scaffolding leadership for learning in school education: Insights from a factor analysis of research conducted in Australian independent schools。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(4),474-490。
6.
Peters, D. H.(2014)。The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking?。Health Research Policy Systems,12(51),1-6。
7.
Renger, R.、Titcomb, A.(2002)。A three-step approach to teaching logic models。American Journal of Evaluation,23(4),493-503。
8.
Spillane, J. P.(2005)。Distributed leadership。The Educational Forum,69(2),143-150。
9.
Leithwood, Kenneth、Harris, Alma、Hopkins, David(2008)。Seven strong claims about successful school leadership。School Leadership & Management,28(1),27-42。
10.
Lewis, C.、Perry, R. R.、Murata, A.(2006)。How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study。Educational Researcher,35(3),3-14。
11.
Robinson, Viviane M. J.、Lloyd, Claire A.、Rowe, Kenneth J.(2008)。The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types。Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5),635-674。
會議論文
1.
Spillane, J. P.、Camburn, E.(2006)。The practice of leading and managing: The distribution of responsibility for leadership and management in the schoolhouse。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco。
圖書
1.
United Way of America(1996)。Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach。United Way of America。
2.
Pont, B.、Nusche, D.、Moorman, H.(2008)。Improving school leadership, volume 1: Policy and practice。Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。
3.
Creswell, J. W.(1988)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions。Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage。
4.
Bolam, R.、McMahon, A.、Stoll, L.、Thomas, S.、Wallace, M.、Greenwood, A.、Smith, M.(2005)。Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities。London, England:University of Bristol。
5.
Chen, H.-T.(2015)。Practical program evaluation: Theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective。Los Angeles, CA:Sage。
6.
Knowlton, L. W.、Phillips, C. C.(2013)。The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。
7.
Midgley, G.(2003)。Systems thinking。Thousand Oak, CA:Sage。
8.
Polly, D.、Heafner, T.、Chapman, M.、Spooner, M.(2015)。Professional development schools and transformative partnerships。Hershey, PA:IGI Global。
9.
Sabatier, P. A.(1999)。Theories of the policy process。Boulder, CO:Westview。
10.
Sato, M.、Chong, Q. Q.(2010)。Challenges for schools: The construction of learning community。Shanghai:East China Normal University。
11.
Sato, M.、Huang, Y. L.、Chong, Q. Q.(2012)。Learning revolution。Taipei:Parenting。
12.
Savigny, D.、Adam, T.(2009)。Systems thinking for health systems strengthening。Genève:World Health Organization。
13.
Sergiovanni, T. J.(2001)。The principalship: A reflective practice perspective。Allyn and Bacon。
14.
Sterman, J. D.(2000)。Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World。McGraw-Hill。
15.
Krippendorff, Klaus H.(1980)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology。Sage。
其他
1.
Butland, B.,Jebb, S.,Kopelman, P.,McPherson, K.,Thomas, S.,Mardell, J.,Parry, V.(2007)。Foresight tackling obesities: Future choices,London, England:Government Office for Science。,https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/28 7937/07-1184x-tackling-obesities-future-choices-report.pdf。
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(1999)。A framework for program evaluation in public health,Atlanta, GA:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention。,https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4811.pdf。
3.
Pan, H. L. W.,Lee, L. J.,Hwang, S. S.,Yu, L.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2014)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 1.1: Basic handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。
4.
Pan, H. L. W.,Hwang, S. S.,Lee, L. J.,Yu, L.,Liu, S. M.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2015)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 2.0: Advanced handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。
5.
Pan, H. L. W.,Lee, L. J.,Hwang, S. S.,Yu, L.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2016)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 1.2: Basic handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。
6.
Reeler, D.(2007)。A three-fold theory of social change: And implication for practice, planning, monitoring and evaluation,Cape Town:The Community Development Resource Association。,http://www.cdra.org.za/uploads/1/1/1/6/111664/threefold_theory_of_change_-_and_implications_for_pme_-_doug_reeler_of_the_cdra.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
Day, C.(2011)。The layering of leadership。Leadership and learning。London, England:Sage。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
校長在學習領導踐行中的資本運用與建構:以推動學習共同體為例
2.
國民中小學學習共同體運作評估指標系統之建構:學習領導之觀點
3.
教師學習領導者的角色與能力:以學習共同體之實踐為例
4.
標準本位政策脈絡下師資培育改革成效之評估:應用「行動模式/改變模式圖式」分析師資培育學程
5.
學習共同體方案對學生學習影響之探究
6.
植基真實情境的共學效應:學習共同體促動之教師改變
7.
促動改變的扳手:學習共同體影響學校變革之分析
8.
校長學習領導與學校願景落實
9.
教師開展學習共同體的反思性實踐
10.
從學習領導論析學習共同體的概念與實踐
1.
以學習共同體為核心的校長學習領導之自我研究
2.
從學習領導之觀點建構國民中小學學習共同體評估指標
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
南投縣實施學習共同體教師之課程意識研究
2.
做了很不一樣:學習共同體對課堂中社會關係及學生學習之影響
3.
香港共同備課及同儕觀課的實施
4.
變革能動者在學校持續改進中之角色
5.
聚焦學生學習的教師領導之挑戰、角色與策略
6.
從時間性解析當前的課程改革
7.
「學習共同體」的課堂風景-五位個案教師理解及實踐之研究
QR Code