:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Applying the Action Model/Change Model Schema in Planning the Learning Community Program in Taiwan
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:潘慧玲 引用關係陳惠次
作者(外文):Pan, Wendy Hui-lingChen, Huey T.
出版日期:2017
卷期:25:1
頁次:頁109-131
主題關鍵詞:行動模式改變模式方案評鑑學習領導學習共同體Action modelChange modelProgram evaluationLeadership for learningLearning community
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
評鑑通常在促進方案改進的歷程中是最後一個步驟,評鑑結果可以提供方案計劃者與利害關係人了解方案缺失,以便在下一階段謀求改善。不過,近來在設計階段即運用評鑑工具與原則以改進方案計劃的歷程上,有日益繁增的興趣。在本文,我們討論了一個較為新近發展的評鑑工具-行動模式/改變模式,作為引導臺灣一項大型教育方案-學習領導下的學習共同體(簡稱學習共同體方案)的規劃,同時也作為評鑑架構之用。我們組織了工作小組會議發展學習共同體的行動模式/改變模式之圖式(schema)。在會議中,參與者討論了圖式中的要素、要素與方案的關連,以及從圖式的發展中所習得的經驗。而針對會議中蒐集的質性資料,採內容分析法進行分析。經過整個圖式發展的過程後,參與者表示行動模式/改變模式之圖式提供了一個討論與發展方案計畫的有效平台,激發了批判性思考,有助於確認方案的主要要素,且提供了評鑑設計一個整全性的引導。該圖式是一個較為新近發展的工具,能俾利評鑑者與利害關係人清楚描繪方案或設計方案,只是目前在少數發表的論文中僅見其應用於公共健康方案。故而,本研究所獲得的結果,一方面可提升教育與其他方案使用該圖式進行方案計劃與評鑑設計,另一方面對於未來在評鑑計劃工具的運用上,亦有鼓勵作用。
Evaluation is often the final step in running social betterment programs. For improvement, evaluation findings inform program planners and stakeholders about program shortcomings. However, interest has recently grown in applying evaluation tools and principles to programs from the design stage, to improve planning. We discuss the application of a relatively new evaluation tool, the action model/change model schema, for guiding the planning of a large-scale education program, the Learning Community under Leadership for Learning (Learning Community Program) in Taiwan and serving as a framework for evaluation at the same time. We organized work-group meetings for the development of an action model/change model schema for the Learning Community Program. The participants discussed the components of the schema and how they related to the program, as well as the lessons learned from the experience of developing the schema. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative data collected during the work-group meetings. The participants indicated that the schema provided an effective platform for discussing and developing the program plan. The schema also stimulated critical thinking, helped identify the major components of the program, and provided a holistic guide for the evaluation design. The action model/change model schema is a relatively new tool used by evaluators to assist stakeholders in describing or designing a program more effectively. Few published articles discuss its applications in public health programs. This study investigated the application of the schema to an education program outside the United States. The lessons learned from this application can promote the schema as an effective tool for planning and designing the evaluation of education and other programs, as well as encourage the use of evaluation planning tools for strengthening program designs in the future.
期刊論文
1.McLaughlin, J. A.、Jordan, G. B.(1999)。Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story。Evaluation and Program Planning,22(1),65-72。  new window
2.Pan, Hui-Ling Wendy(2014)。School practices of leading learning in Taiwan。Leading and Managing,20(2),27-42。  new window
3.Julian, D. A.、Jones, A.、Deyo, D.(1995)。Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools。Evaluation and Program Planning,18(4),333-341。  new window
4.Kaplan, S. A.、Garrett, K. E.(2005)。The use of logic models by community-based initiatives。Evaluation and Program Planning,28(2),167-172。  new window
5.Marsh, S.、Waniganayake, M.、Gibson, I. W.(2014)。Scaffolding leadership for learning in school education: Insights from a factor analysis of research conducted in Australian independent schools。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(4),474-490。  new window
6.Peters, D. H.(2014)。The application of systems thinking in health: Why use systems thinking?。Health Research Policy Systems,12(51),1-6。  new window
7.Renger, R.、Titcomb, A.(2002)。A three-step approach to teaching logic models。American Journal of Evaluation,23(4),493-503。  new window
8.Spillane, J. P.(2005)。Distributed leadership。The Educational Forum,69(2),143-150。  new window
9.Leithwood, Kenneth、Harris, Alma、Hopkins, David(2008)。Seven strong claims about successful school leadership。School Leadership & Management,28(1),27-42。  new window
10.Lewis, C.、Perry, R. R.、Murata, A.(2006)。How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study。Educational Researcher,35(3),3-14。  new window
11.Robinson, Viviane M. J.、Lloyd, Claire A.、Rowe, Kenneth J.(2008)。The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types。Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5),635-674。  new window
會議論文
1.Spillane, J. P.、Camburn, E.(2006)。The practice of leading and managing: The distribution of responsibility for leadership and management in the schoolhouse。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco。  new window
圖書
1.United Way of America(1996)。Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach。United Way of America。  new window
2.Pont, B.、Nusche, D.、Moorman, H.(2008)。Improving school leadership, volume 1: Policy and practice。Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
3.Creswell, J. W.(1988)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions。Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Bolam, R.、McMahon, A.、Stoll, L.、Thomas, S.、Wallace, M.、Greenwood, A.、Smith, M.(2005)。Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities。London, England:University of Bristol。  new window
5.Chen, H.-T.(2015)。Practical program evaluation: Theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective。Los Angeles, CA:Sage。  new window
6.Knowlton, L. W.、Phillips, C. C.(2013)。The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
7.Midgley, G.(2003)。Systems thinking。Thousand Oak, CA:Sage。  new window
8.Polly, D.、Heafner, T.、Chapman, M.、Spooner, M.(2015)。Professional development schools and transformative partnerships。Hershey, PA:IGI Global。  new window
9.Sabatier, P. A.(1999)。Theories of the policy process。Boulder, CO:Westview。  new window
10.Sato, M.、Chong, Q. Q.(2010)。Challenges for schools: The construction of learning community。Shanghai:East China Normal University。  new window
11.Sato, M.、Huang, Y. L.、Chong, Q. Q.(2012)。Learning revolution。Taipei:Parenting。  new window
12.Savigny, D.、Adam, T.(2009)。Systems thinking for health systems strengthening。Genève:World Health Organization。  new window
13.Sergiovanni, T. J.(2001)。The principalship: A reflective practice perspective。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
14.Sterman, J. D.(2000)。Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World。McGraw-Hill。  new window
15.Krippendorff, Klaus H.(1980)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology。Sage。  new window
其他
1.Butland, B.,Jebb, S.,Kopelman, P.,McPherson, K.,Thomas, S.,Mardell, J.,Parry, V.(2007)。Foresight tackling obesities: Future choices,London, England:Government Office for Science。,https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/28 7937/07-1184x-tackling-obesities-future-choices-report.pdf。  new window
2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(1999)。A framework for program evaluation in public health,Atlanta, GA:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention。,https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4811.pdf。  new window
3.Pan, H. L. W.,Lee, L. J.,Hwang, S. S.,Yu, L.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2014)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 1.1: Basic handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。  new window
4.Pan, H. L. W.,Hwang, S. S.,Lee, L. J.,Yu, L.,Liu, S. M.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2015)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 2.0: Advanced handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。  new window
5.Pan, H. L. W.,Lee, L. J.,Hwang, S. S.,Yu, L.,Hsueh, Y. T.(2016)。Learning community under the leadership for learning version 1.2: Basic handbook,https://sites.google.com/site/learningcommunityintw/lchandbook。  new window
6.Reeler, D.(2007)。A three-fold theory of social change: And implication for practice, planning, monitoring and evaluation,Cape Town:The Community Development Resource Association。,http://www.cdra.org.za/uploads/1/1/1/6/111664/threefold_theory_of_change_-_and_implications_for_pme_-_doug_reeler_of_the_cdra.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Day, C.(2011)。The layering of leadership。Leadership and learning。London, England:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE