學童運動自我設限量表之修訂研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	學童運動自我設限量表之修訂研究
書刊名：	國立臺灣體育運動大學學報
作者：	卓國雄
作者(外文)：	Cho, Kuo-hsiung
出版日期：	2016
卷期：	5:2
頁次：	頁45-65
主題關鍵詞：	學童選手；自我設限；害怕失敗；Children player；Self-handicapping；Fear of failure
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:8 點閱:6

緒論：鑒於國內缺乏探究國小學童選手運動自我設限之測量工具，本研究目的旨在以心理計量分析驗證修訂版的學童運動自我設限量表之建構效度及效標關聯效度。方法：本研究分為二個次研究，研究一以412位學童運動選手為研究對象並隨機分成二組各為206位受試的獨立樣本，第一組樣本進行項目分析及探索性，研究二則以第二組參與者進行驗證性因素分析，最後再以412位樣本考驗效標關聯效度。結果：經項目分析及探索性因素分析保留「辯解因素」的單因素七個題項，接著再以驗證性因素分析考驗假設性測量模式，結構方程模式分析顯示GFI = .92、RMSEA = .04、CFI=0.98、NNFI = .98六題單因素模式具有良好的建構效度；相關分析支持本量表的效標關聯效度，效標變項與自我設限構念呈顯著正相關 (r = .41, p < .001)。結論：單因素運動自我設限測量模式較適配國小學童選手之實徵觀察樣本，適合國內研究國小運動選手自我設限議題之測量工具。未來研究應進一步驗證其是否具有跨性別或年級之測量恆等性效度。

以文找文

INTRODUCTION: Owing to the lack of measurement about sport self-handicapping for the children player in Taiwan. So, the present study was to examine the construct validity and criterion-related validity of the revised Children Sport Self-handicapping Scale (CSSHS) by psychometric analysis (e.g., item analysis, EFA, CFA and criterion-related validity). METHODS: This study included two independent samples who sampled randomly from 412 elementary players. The two different samples had to administer CSSHS and Athletic Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory. The first 206 elementary players participated in study1. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted to examine the factor structure of CSSHS. In study2, confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis were conducted with the second 206 subjects to examine the structural validity of CSSHS. RESULTS: Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that the CSSHS had appropriate structural validity of the six-items single factor . This factor structure was good fit for the empirical data (GFI＝.92、RMSEA＝.04、CFI=0.98、NNFI＝.98). The criterion-related validity has been accepted (r ＝.41, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CSSHS was a useful inventory for measure children sport self-handicapping in Taiwan. In the future, the aim of study will examine the measurement invariance issue of CSSHS across sex and levels.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Martin, A. J.、Marsh, H. W.、Debus, R. L.(2003)。Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: A model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective。Contemporary Educational Psychology，28，1-36。
2.	Kimble, C. E.、Kimble, E. A.、Croy, N. A.(1998)。Development of self-handicapping tendencies。The Journal of Social Psychology，138(4)，524-534。
3.	Strube, M. J.(1986)。An analysis of the self-handicapping scale。Basic and Applied Social Psychology，7(3)，211-224。
4.	Eronen, S.、Nurmi, J.、Salmela-Aro, K.(1998)。Optimistic, defensive-pessimistic, impulsive and self-handicapping strategies in university environments。Learning and Instruction，8(2)，159-177。
5.	Berglas, Steven、Jones, Edward E.(1978)。Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，36(4)，405-417。
6.	Elliot, A. J.、Church, M. A.(2003)。A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self-handicapping。Journal of Personality，71(3)，369-396。
7.	Zuckerman, Miron、Kieffer, Suzanne C.、Knee, C. Raymond(1998)。Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects on coping, academic performance and adjustment。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，74(6)，1616-1628。
8.	Bentler, P. M.(1990)。Comparative fit indexes in structural model。Psychological Bulletin，107，238-246。
9.	Jones, E. E.、Berglas, S.(1978)。Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，4(2)，200-206。
10.	卓國雄、盧俊宏(20080600)。學童選手運動表現害怕失敗評估量表發展之研究。教育學刊，30，167-192。延伸查詢
11.	Zuckerman, M.、Tsai, F. F.(2005)。Costs of Self-handicapping。Journal of personality，73(2)，411-442。
12.	Alesi, M.、Rappo, G.、Pepi, A.(2012)。Self-esteem at school and self-handicapping in childhood: Comparison of groups with learning disabilities。Psychological Reports: Disability & Trauma，111(3)，952-962。
13.	Akin, A.(2012)。Self-handicapping scale: A study of validity and reliability。Eğitim ve Bilim，37，176-187。
14.	Clarke, I. E.、MacCann, C.(2016)。Internal and external aspects of self-handicapping reflect the distinction between motivations and behaviors: Evidence from the Self-handicapping Scale。Personality and Individual Differences，100，6-11。
15.	Kraiem, S.、Bertsch, J.(2011)。Adaptation francaise d'une echelle d'auto-handicap: La Self-Handicapping Scale。Revue Ienternationale de Psychologie Sociale，24，5-31。
16.	Martin, K. A.、Brawley, L. R.(1999)。Is the Self-handicapping Scale reliable in nonacademic achievement domains?。Personality and Individual Differences，27，901-911。
17.	McCrea, S. M.、Hirt, E. R.、Hendrix, K. L.、Milner, B. J.、Steele, N. L.(2008)。The worker scale: Developing a measure to explain gender differences in behavioral self-handicapping。Journal of Research in Personality，42，949-970。
18.	Passer, M. W.(1983)。Fear of failure, fear of evaluation, perceived competence and self-esteem in competitive-trait-anxiety children。Journal of Sport Psychology，5，172-188。
19.	Schwinger, M.、Stiensmeier-Pelster, J.(2011)。Prevention of self-handicapping-the protective function of mastery goals。Learning and Individual Differences，21，699-709。
20.	Schwinger, M.、Wirthwein, L.、Lemmer, G.、Steinmayr, R.(2014)。Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis。Journal of Educational Psychology，106，744-761。
21.	Trautwein, U.、Liidtke, O.、Koller, O.、Baumert, J.(2006)。Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concepts。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，90(2)，334-349。
22.	Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika，39(1)，31-36。
23.	Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research，18(1)，39-50。
24.	吳佳煇、王澤惠、林以正(20040200)。運動自我設限量表之探索性驗證性因素分析。大專體育學刊，6(1)，139-148。延伸查詢
25.	Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，6(1)，1-55。
26.	Chen, L. H.、Wu, C. H.、Kee, Y. H.、Lin, M. S.、Shui, S. H.(2009)。Fear of failure, 2x2 achievement goal and self-handicapping: An examination of the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in physical education。Contemporary Educational Psychology，34(4)，298-305。

學位論文
1.	陳偉瑀(2001)。競爭情境及回饋方式對高、低自我設限學生在運動練習行為、運動表現及歸因的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院，桃園。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Hair, J. F.、Black, W. C.、Babin, B. J.、Anderson, R. E.、Tatham, R. L.(2010)。Multivariate Data Analysis。NY：Macmillan Publishing Company。
2.	Wolman, B. B.(1973)。Dictionary of behavior sciences。New York：Ven Nostrand Reinhold Company。
3.	Covington, Martin V.(1992)。Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
4.	Jones, E. E.、Rhodewalt, F.(1982)。The Self-Handicapping Scale。Salt Lake City, UT：Development of Psychology, Princeton University and University of Utah。
5.	Rhodewalt, F.(1984)。Self-handicapping Scale: Convergent and discriminant validity。Salt Lake City, UT：Department of Psychology, University of Utah。
6.	Birney, R. C.、Burdick, H.、Teevan, R. C.(1969)。Fear of failure。Van Nostrand Reinhold。

圖書論文
1.	Rhodewalt, Frederick(1990)。Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self-protective acts。Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't。New York：Plenum Press。
2.	Scanlan, T. K.(1984)。Competitive stress and the child athlete。Psychological foundations of sport。Champaign, IL：Human Kinetics。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	國小棒球選手知覺教練的專制領導行為與社會支持對害怕失敗之影響
2.	學童選手害怕失敗、能力知覺與自我設限的關係：2×2成就目標之中介效果
3.	運動情境中害怕失敗與2×2成就目標之因果關係驗證
4.	以社會學習的觀點看父母期望、父母教養方式對學童運動選手害怕失敗的影響
5.	2004~2009結構方程模式在體育領域論文運用之探討
6.	學童選手運動表現害怕失敗評估量表發展之研究
7.	體育課必修與選修學生在運動自我設限行為之差異
8.	共同性估計對因素分析準確度之探討
9.	運動自我設限量表之探索性驗證性因素分析
10.	目標取向、自我評價及歸因型態對運動員自我設限行為之影響

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫