:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國專利蓄意侵權之認定--2016年美國最高法院Halo v. Pulse案
書刊名:專利師
作者:楊智傑 引用關係
出版日期:2017
卷期:28
頁次:頁4-31
主題關鍵詞:蓄意侵權專利侵害專利法美國
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:18
期刊論文
1.Liang, Mark、Berliner, Brian(2013)。Fee Shifting in Patent Litigation。Virginia Journal of Law and Technology,18,60-86。  new window
2.Jennings, Kenneth(2013)。The Highmark Fracture: In Search of the Appropriate Standard of Review for Exceptional Case Determinations in Patent Litigation。N. C. J. L. & Tech. On.,14,301-334。  new window
3.Morre, Kimberly A.(2000)。Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases: An Empirical Peek Inside The Black Box。Michigan Law Review,99,365-409。  new window
4.Hicks, Tyler A.(2016)。Breaking the "Link" Between Awards for Attorney's Fees and Enhanced Damages in Patent Law。Cal. W. L. REV.,52,191-211。  new window
5.Carlton, Tim(2009)。The Ongoing Royalty: What Remedy Should a Patent Holder Receive When a Permanent Injunction Is Denied?。Ga. L. Rev.,43,543-555。  new window
6.Wang, Don Zhe Nan(2016)。End of the Parallel Between Patent Law's §284 Willifidness and §285 Exceptional Case Analysis。Wash. J. L. Tech. & Arts.,11,311-318。  new window
7.楊博堯、劉尚志(20150500)。從故意侵權論我國專利懲罰性損害賠償實務之發展。智慧財產權月刊,197,42-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳靜怡(20141200)。專利侵權損害賠償之實證研究。科技法學評論,11(2),175-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.洪紹庭、王立達(20150600)。我國法上專利侵權賠償責任之主觀要件--以智財法院判決實證研究為中心。科技法學評論,12(1),57-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Moore, Kimberly A.(2004)。Empirical Statistics on Willful Patent Infringement。The Federal Circuit Bar Journal,14,227-237。  new window
圖書
1.謝銘洋(2008)。智慧財產權法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.葉雲卿。被告如何有效抗辯惡意侵權?--專利意見書的角色與功能之轉變,http://www.naipo.com/Portals/l/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Infringement_Case/publish-49.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.蔡蕙芳(2008)。美國著作權法上刑事著作權侵權之研究。著作權侵權與其刑事責任。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE