:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣基層治理之制度設計與能力型塑:兼論新住民在村里、社區發展協會與公民審議會議的角色
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:張筵儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Yan-yi
出版日期:2017
卷期:23:2
頁次:頁134-167
主題關鍵詞:基層治理公民審議會議新住民村里社區發展協會Neighbourhood governanceCivic deliberative meetingImmigrant residentsVillageCommunity development association
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:100
  • 點閱點閱:34
在英美國家部分地區因為公共服務不足,基層活動瀕臨斷裂,更進而導致治安與犯罪層出不窮。故基層治理(neighborhood governance)在英美一直是一個重要的課題,尤其涉及到社區民眾的基層活動,都可以說是基層治理的核心。在基層治理過程當中,當地居民透過當地參與機制,來實現基層治理的特質。臺灣與英美不同的是,臺灣並沒有像英美有些地區之基層面臨到治安與嚴峻的犯罪問題。本研究使用「基層治理」一詞,主要界定為正式制度--村里、社區發展協會,以及非正式制度--公民審議會議的活動參與,包含目前推動的參與式預算。同時,本研究採納Lowndes and Sullivan(2008)提到基層治理的四種類型做為論述基礎。故臺灣目前基層治理遇到的棘手現狀,就是臺灣新住民人口的增加,以及新住民主要擔任起照顧家庭的責任,參與基層活動並不踴躍。幸運的是,這幾年臺北市推動新住民參加參與式預算提案,正好嘗試彌補新住民參與的不足。但無論如何,本文認為一種新的基層治理之公民參與正在發展,與改變臺灣基層治理樣貌。
In some areas of the Anglo-American countries, neighbourhood governance activities are on the brink of fault, and thus lead to crime endless. Therefore, neighbourhood governance in Britain and the United States has always been an important issue, especially related to the community activities. In the neighbourhood governance process, the local residents through the local participation mechanism to achieve the characteristics of neighbourhood governance. Compared with Britain and the United States, there are no areas in Taiwan like Anglo-American face of out of order and serious crime. This study uses the term“neighbourhood governance”which is defined primarily as a formal system of village, community development association, and informal system of civic deliberative meeting, including current participatory budgets. At the same time, this study adopted Lowndes and Sullivan (2008) that the four types of neighbourhood governance are discussed as basic models. Therefore, the current situation of Taiwan's neighbourhood governance is the increase in the population of immigrant residents in Taiwan. The more responsibilities of the immigrant residents are to take care of the aged parents of family and the less opportunity to participate in neighbourhood activities. Fortunately, in recent years, Taipei City Government has been promoted immigrant residents to participate in participatory budget proposals. Finally, this study argues that a new phenomenon of citizen participation is developing and changing Taiwan's neighbourhood governance.
期刊論文
1.黃東益(20081200)。審議過後--從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結。東吳政治學報,26(4),59-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.江大樹、張力亞(20090600)。縣市長的領導力與地方治理--一個標竿學習的實證研究。臺灣民主,6(2),61-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李淑萍(20121200)。新莊區新住民之環境識覺與地方認同研究。北市教大社教學報,11,225-258。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡育軒、陳怡君、王業立(20071200)。社區發展協會、選舉動員與地方政治。東吳政治學報,25(4),93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳明儒(20090900)。社區多元文化與社會包容之探討:以臺灣新移民女性為例。社區發展季刊,127,99-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.許文英(20120900)。城市新移民治理--臺灣經驗。城市學學刊,3(2),153-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.廖南貴(20140300)。村里治理的理論與實務:以花蓮縣村里長之認知為例。競爭力評論,17,1-18。  延伸查詢new window
8.Lowndes, V.、Sullivan, H.(2008)。How low can you go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance。Public Administration,86(1),53-74。  new window
9.Fraser, James、Bazuin, Joshua Theodore、Hornberger, George(2016)。The Privatization of Neighborhood Governance and the Production of Urban Space。Environment and Planning A,48(5),1-27。  new window
10.Durose, Catherine、Lowndes, V.(2010)。Neighbourhood Governance: Contested Rationales within a Multi-level Setting--a Study of Manchester。Local Government Studies,36(3),341-359。  new window
11.Le Galès, P.(1998)。Regulations and Governance in European Cities。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,22(3),482-507。  new window
12.Ndou, Siphiwe D.、Sebola, Mokoko P.(2015)。Capacity Building in Local Government: An Analysis for Application of Competency-based Training in South Africa。The Business and Management Review,6(5),90-100。  new window
13.Parlow, Matthew J.(2010)。Revolutions in Local Democracy? Neighborhood Councils and Broadening Inclusion in the Local Political Process。Michigan Journal of Race and Law,16(1),81-98。  new window
14.Pill, Madeleine(2012)。Neighbourhood initiatives in Wales and England: Shifting Purposes and Changing Scales。People, Place & Policy Online,6(2),76-89。  new window
15.Purdue, Derrick(2001)。Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital。Urban Studies,38(12),2211-2224。  new window
16.Somerville, Peter、Van Beckhoven, Ellen、Van Kempen, Ronald(2009)。The Decline and Rise of Neighbourhoods: The Importance of Neighbourhood Governance。European Journal of Housing Policy,9(1),25-44。  new window
17.Uitermark, Justus、Duyvendak, Jan Willem(2008)。Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in the Netherlands。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,32(1),114-134。  new window
18.Wan, Xiaoyuan(2015)。Changing governmentalities of neighborhood governance in China: a genealogical exploration。Journal of Critical Policy Studies,9(4),454-472。  new window
19.Vincent, Chakunda、Stephen, Chakaipa(2015)。Local Government Capacity Building and Development: Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities。Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs,3(1),1-5。  new window
20.呂育誠(20020600)。臺灣村里制度定位與功能之研究。行政暨政策學報,34,85-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.李柏諭(20100300)。實效社區治理模式的重組與實踐 : 以社區大學為例。東吳政治學報,28(1),33-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳奕伶(20110900)。政治代表、治理效率與城市穩定:論中國大陸城市基層治理策略中的國家與社會關係。東吳政治學報,29(3),121-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.盧春霖(2004)。社區政治:村里、社區發展協會與自發性組織在社區營造上的衝突與合作(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.李海鈺(2004)。里長官派可行性之研究--以高雄市為個案分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡慧君(2015)。當道德政策遇上審議民主--以2014流浪犬政策公民會議為例(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林麗蓉(2011)。村里與社區發展協會之關係研究--臺中市豐原區為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.梁鈞淳(2016)。後社會主義中國基層治理的細碎化變革--以廈門海滄新城社區的網格化管理為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳怡君(2006)。村里與社區發展協會關係之研究--以台中縣市為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳男進(2004)。基層村里與社區發展協會整合之研究--以南投縣921震災重建區為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.張燕羣(2010)。村里長產生方式與村里功能之研究--以臺中縣神岡鄉之分析(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭正全(2013)。里辦公處與社區發展協會互動關係--以台中市龍井區為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pierre, Jon、Peters, B. Guy(2000)。Governance, politics and the state。Macmillan。  new window
2.陳天祥(2015)。基層治理中的國家與社會--角色動力與行為。廣州:中山大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張春陽(2015)。新加坡基層組織:政府與人民之間的緩衝力量。北京:民主與建設出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Pendall, Rolf、Hendey, Leah、Turner, Margery Austin、Poethig, Erika(2016)。Revitalizing Neighborhoods: The Federal Role。Urban Institute。  new window
5.Sharp, Elaine B.(2012)。Does Local Government Matter? How Urban Policies Shape Civic Engagement。Minneapolis, Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
6.Yip, Ngai-Ming(2014)。Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China。Edward Elgar。  new window
7.Goss, Sue(2001)。Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change。Palgrave。  new window
單篇論文
1.紀俊臣(2002)。村里與社區體制存廢之考量,http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-C-091-193.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cox, Ed,Turley, Anna,Davies, Bill,Harrison, Mark(2013)。Love thy Neighbourhood: People and place in social reform,Institute for Public Policy Research。  new window
其他
1.文崇一(1973)。權力與決策--以精簡機構與里民大會為例,www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/ios/sociologistPub/chungiwen/權力與決策.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪申翰(2011)。環境前線:運動政治力的極限,http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-105003。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯伶穎(2016)。新移民媽媽 提案可望變政策,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160908000490-260107。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳俊志(2013)。鄰里議會制度運作的經驗與借鏡。  延伸查詢new window
5.萬毓澤(2016)。臺灣當前的參與式預算概況:反省與前瞻,https://twstreetcorner.org/2016/03/01/wanyuze-2/。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾嘉明(2004)。我參加「大漢溪親水空間」公民共識會議,http://pccu.org.tw/?page_id=1259。  延伸查詢new window
7.臺灣大學社會系林國明教授團隊(2012)。公民共識會議,聽聽公民的聲音!,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/19799。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳陸輝、陳奕伶(2011)。城鄉基層治理。中國大陸暨兩岸關係研究。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE