:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:英文學科能力測驗選擇題之性別差異與差異試題功能分析
書刊名:東吳外語學報
作者:廖彥棻 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Yen-fen
出版日期:2015
卷期:41
頁次:頁21-59
主題關鍵詞:英文科學科能力測驗性別差異差異試題功能分析測驗公平性結構效度The English GSATGender differencesDifferential item functioning analysisTest fairnessConstruct validity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:16
學科能力測驗(簡稱學測)在臺灣為一重要而普及的大學入學測驗,因此該測驗是否具有信度、效度與公平性等議題,值得進一步探討。其中,影響測驗效度與公平性的可能因素之一即為考生的性別;不同性別的考生測驗表現是否存在顯著差異?尤其是性別不同,但能力相同的個人,是否在答對某個試題上的機率有所不同,因而呈現差異試題功能(DIF)的現象?換句話說,是否學測的考題可能會對某種性別的考生特別有利?然而目前文獻較少有針對大學學測英文考科是否存有性別差異與DIF試題的相關研究。因此,本研究主要目的即在比較男女考生在九十八學年度大學學測英文考科選擇題的測驗表現;並進一步採用M-H分析法(Mantel-Haenszel analysis)與logistic迴歸分析(logistic regression),進行差異試題功能分析檢測,逐一檢視各題是否因性別而存在DIF。研究結果顯示女性考生的英文學測成績略高於男性考生,並發現少數幾題具有性別DIF的現象,但尚不構成明顯的試題偏誤。
The General Scholastic Ability Test(GSAT) is a widely-used college entrance exam in Taiwan. It is thus more critical than ever that the test scores be reliable and that the inferences drawn from the results be valid and fair. One of the factors influencing test validity and fairness is gender. The major concern is to examine if there are significant gender differences in test scores and if there are items which favor a certain group. In other words, if female test takers with the same trait level as male counterparts have different expected scores on the same item, differential item functioning(DIF) may be present in the item. To date, these issues are yet to receive a lot of attention in the English GSAT context. The aim of the current study is to investigate gender differences in the 98 English GSAT multiple-choice scores and detect gender DIF items using the Mantel-Haenszel method and logistic regression analysis. The results showed that female test-takers scored slightly higher than males in the English GSAT. Few potentially gender DIF items were flagged, but no systematic bias was detected.
期刊論文
1.Bacon, S. M.(1992)。The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening。The Modern Language Journal,76(2),160-178。  new window
2.Bügel, K.、Buunk, B. P.(1996)。Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge。The Modern Language Journal,80(1),15-31。  new window
3.Uiterwijk, H.、Vallen, T.(2005)。Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests。Language Testing,22,211-234。  new window
4.林奕宏、林世華(20040600)。國小高年級數學科成就測驗中與性別有關的DIF現象。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),67-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Farhady, Hossein(1982)。Measures of Language Proficiency from the Learner's Perspective。TESOL Quarterly,16(1),43-59。  new window
6.Wainer, H.、Lukhele, R.(1997)。How reliable are TOEFL scores?。Educational and Psychological Measurement,57(5),741-759。  new window
7.Ryan, K.、Bachman, L. F.(1992)。Differential item functioning on two tests of EFL proficiency。Language testing,9(1),12-29。  new window
8.Kunnan, A. J.(1992)。An investigation of a criterion-referenced test using G-theory, and factor and cluster analyses。Language Testing,9,30-49。  new window
9.Swaminathan, H.、Rogers, H. J.(1990)。Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures。Journal of Educational Measurement,27(4),361-370。  new window
10.Reckase, M. D.(1979)。Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications。Journal of Educational Statistics,4(3),207-230。  new window
11.余光雄(20080400)。探究臺灣大專入學英文科試題與語言能力測試理論及高中/職的英文教學之關係。研習資訊,25(2),11-26。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱秀惠(20081200)。Are There Any Gender Differences in the GEPT Picture Description Listening Comprehension Test?。嘉南學報. 人文類,34,409-422。new window  new window
13.國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心(2009)。九十五〜九十七年國中基本學力測驗性別DIF分析。飛揚,55,20-23。  延伸查詢new window
14.管美蓉(20100600)。大學入學考試問題回顧--從輿論觀點分析(1962~2000)。考試學刊,8,147-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.盧雪梅(19990300)。差別試題功能(DIF)的檢定方法。臺北市立師範學院學報,30,149-165。  延伸查詢new window
16.蕭偉智、傅家珍(20121200)。國中八年級自然科定期評量之性別差別試題功能(DIF)分析。新竹教育大學教育學報,29(2),35-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Abbott, M. L.(2007)。A Confirmatory Approach to Differential Item Functioning on an ESL Reading Assessment。Language Testing,24(1),7-36。  new window
18.Ahmadi, A.、Mansoordehghan, S.(2012)。Comprehending a Non-text: A Study of Gender- based Differences in EFL Reading Comprehension。Journal of Language Teaching and Research,3(4),761-770。  new window
19.Ay, S.、Bartan, Ozgiir S.(2012)。The Effect of Topic Interest and Gender on Reading Test Types in a Second Language。The Reading Matrix,12(1),62-79。  new window
20.Cheng, II.、Lee, E.、Liou, P.、Chung, W.(2010)。Are Female Better Language Learners? - A Cases Study。WHAMPOA-An Interdisciplinary Journal,59,55-72。  new window
21.Bichi, A. A.、Embong, R.、Mamat, M.、Maiwada, D. A.(2015)。Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory: A Review of Empirical Studies。Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,9(7),549-556。  new window
22.Ferne, T.、Rupp, A.(2007)。A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research on DIF in Language Testing: Methodological Advances, Challenges, and Recommendation。Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal,4,113-148。  new window
23.龔營(20100700)。An Analysis of Problems of Taiwanese IELTS Test Candidates in Their Speaking Sub-Test。Hwa Kang English Journal,16,141-167。new window  new window
24.Fidalgo, A. M.、Ferreres, D.、MuÑiz, J.(2004)。Utility of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Small Samples。Educational and Psychological Measurement,64,925-936。  new window
25.Kondratek, B.、Grudniewska, M.(2014)。Comparison of Mantel-Haenszel with IRT Procedures for DIF detection and Effect Size Estimation for Dichotomous Items。EDUKAJA: An Interdisciplinary Approach,5(130),92-111。  new window
26.Kamata, A.、Vaughn, B. K.(2004)。An Introduction to Differential Item Function Analysis。Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal,2(2),49-69。  new window
27.James, C. L.(2010)。Do Language Proficiency Test Scores Differ by Gender?。TESOL Quarterly,44(2),387-398。  new window
28.李美麟(20110100)。Gender Difference in EFL Learners' Spoken Discourse--A Case Study。外國語文研究,13,1-31。new window  new window
29.Pae, T.-I.(2004)。Gender Effect on Reading Comprehension with Korean EFL Learners。System,32,265-281。  new window
30.Pae, T.-I.(2012)。Causes of Gender DIF on an EFL Language Test: A Multiple-data Analysis over Nine Years。Language Testing,29(4),533-554。  new window
31.Pae, T.-I.、Park, G.-P.(2006)。Examining the Relationship between Differential Item Functioning and Differential Test Functioning。Language Testing,23(4),475-496。  new window
32.Park, G.-P.(2008)。Differential Item Functioning on an English Listening Test across Gender。TESOL Quarterly,42(1),115-123。  new window
33.Penfield, R. D.(2007)。An Approach for Categorizing DIF in Polytomous Items。Applied Measurement in Education,20(3),335-355。  new window
34.Polat, Nihat(2011)。Gender Differences in Motivation and L2 Accent Attainment: An Investigation of Young Kurdish Learners of Turkish。The Language Learning Journal,39(1),19-41。  new window
35.Rao, Z.(2005)。Gender, Academic Major, and Chinese Students' Use of Language Learning Strategies: Social and Educational Perspectives。The Journal of Asia TEFL,2(3),115-138。  new window
36.Sireci, S. G.、Allalouf, A.(2003)。Appraising Item Equivalence across Multiple Languages and Cultures。Language Testing,20,148-166。  new window
37.Song, X.、Cheng, L.、Klinger, D.(2015)。DIF Investigations across Groups of Gender and Academic Background in a Large-scale High-stakes Language Test。Language Testing and Assessment,4(1),97-124。  new window
38.Takala, S.、Kaftandjieva, F.(2000)。Teat Fairness: A DIF Analysis of an L2 Vocabulary Test。Language Testing,17,323-340。  new window
39.Young, D. J.、Oxford, R.(1997)。A Gender-related Analysis of Strategies Used to Process Input in the Native Language and a Foreign Language。Applied Language Learning,8,43-73。  new window
40.盧雪梅(20071200)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗國文科和英語科成就性別差異和性別差別試題功能(DIF)分析。教育研究與發展期刊,3(4),79-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.Mantel, N.、Haenszel, W.(1959)。Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data from Retrospective Studies of Disease。Journal of the National Cancer Institute,22(4),719-748。  new window
42.余民寧、謝進昌(20060600)。國中基本學力測驗之DIF的實徵分析:以91年度兩次測驗為例。教育學刊,26,241-275。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.盧雪梅、毛國楠(20081200)。國中基本學力測驗自然科之性別差異和差別試題功能(DIF)分析。測驗學刊,55(4),725-759。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.盧雪梅(20091200)。國中基本學力測驗社會科之性別差異和差別試題功能(DIF)分析。臺東大學教育學報,20(2),31-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Jodoin, M. G.、Gierl, M. J.(2001)。Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection。Applied Measurement in Education,14(4),329-349。  new window
會議論文
1.Holland, P. W.、Thayer, D.(1986)。Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure。The 67th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco, CA。  new window
2.Holland, P. W.(1985)。On the Study of Differential Item Difficulty without IRT。The 27th Annual Conference of the Military Testing Association。San Diego, CA:Navy Personnel Research and Development Center。282-287。  new window
3.Wu, R. W.(2009)。Differential Item Functioning in Gender and Living Background Groups in the GEPT。The 13th International Conference on Language Education,National Kaohsiung Normal University 。Kaohsiung。  new window
4.Yu, C. C.(2010)。Meeting Challenges and Upgrading Tests for College Entrance。The 12th Academic Forum on English Language Testing in Asia。  new window
學位論文
1.周思余(2009)。學科能力測驗與指定科目考試英文考科克漏字試題分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳秀娟(2009)。英語閱讀能力測驗之內涵與閱讀能力之評析:以大學學科能力測驗與指定科目考試為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧珍予(2002)。台灣學科能力英文閱讀測驗之評析及其教學啟示(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chiu, P. C.(2008)。The Effect of English Proficiency on Mathematics Performance: A Comparison of Item Response Theory-Based Area and Mantel-Haenszel Methods(碩士論文)。University of Kansas,Kansas。  new window
5.董幸正(2008)。過去五十年來大學入學考試英文科試題變革分析研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.藍偉華(2007)。大學學科能力測驗及指定科目考試英文閱讀測驗之評析:以布魯姆認知分類(修訂版)析之(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hopkins, Kenneth D.(1998)。Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Bachman, L. F.、Palmer, A. S.(1996)。Language Testing in Practice。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Bailey, K. M.(1998)。Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions。Heinle & Heinle。  new window
4.夏林清、蕭次融、劉澄桂(2005)。九十至九十三學年度學科能力測驗、指定科目考試試題差別功能檢核計畫。臺北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭次融、劉澄桂、連秋華(2001)。學科能力測驗試題差別功能分析。臺北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.Educational Testing Service(2014)。Test and Score Data Summary for TOEFL iBT Tests: January 2013-December 2013 Test Data。Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service。  new window
7.Pellegrino, J. W.(2001)。Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment。Washington, DC:National Academies Press。  new window
8.Zumbo, B. D.(1999)。A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling as a Unitary Framework for Binary and Likert-type (Ordinal) Item Scores。Ottawa, Ontario:Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense。  new window
9.余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論(IRT)及其應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ebel, Robert L.、Frisbie, David A.(1991)。Essentials of educational measurement。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
11.Cohen, Jacob E.(1988)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
單篇論文
1.Lin, J.,Wu, F.(2003)。Differential Performance by Gender in Foreign Language Testing,http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED478206.pdf,(ED478206)。  new window
其他
1.林秀慧(2009)。九十八學年度學科能力測驗試題分析--英文考科,http://www.ceec.edu.tw/Research2/doc_980828/ C%E5%AD%B898-2.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.IELTS(2012)。Researchers-Test Taker Performance 2012,http://www.ielts.org/researchers/analysis-of-test-data/test-taker-peiformance-2012.aspx。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dorans, Neil J.、Holland, Paul W.(1993)。DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization。Differential item functioning。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Park, T.(2006)。Detecting DIF across Differential Language and Gender Groups in the MELAB Essay Test Using the Logistic Regression Method。Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment。Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan English Language Institute。  new window
3.Wang, S.(2006)。Validation and Invariance of Factor Structure of the ECPE and MELAB across Gender。Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment。Ann Arbor, M:University of Michigan English Language Institute。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE