臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：民眾公平性觀感與滿意度關聯性之研究--以臺灣全民健保政策為例
書刊名：國家與社會
作者：陳敦源 引用關係／陳麗光／黃汎如／蘇孔志
作者(外文)：Chen, Don-yun／Chen, Li-kwang／Huang, Fanju／Su, Kung-chih
出版日期：2017
卷期：19
頁次：頁91-159
主題關鍵詞：民眾滿意度調查；新公共管理；效率與效能；程序公平性；實質公平性；Citizen satisfaction；New public management；Efficiency；Effectiveness；Procedural justice；Substantive justice
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:185
  • 點閱點閱:21
[研究緣起與問題] 新公共管理自1980s年代興起以來，對公共行政帶來重大的影響，其中顧客導向的主張，更引進了私部門顧客滿意度調查在公部門廣泛的應用。同時因為民主化的推波助瀾，政府將民眾視為「頭家」，更加突顯民眾滿意度的重要。然而，回顧過去公部門民眾滿意度調查，發現評估指標著重在效率或是效能面，缺乏公共行政引以為本的公平性價值探討。有鑑於此，本研究以全民健保政策為個案，嘗試建構一個兼顧效率與公平性面向的民眾滿意度模型，並將焦點置於民眾公平性觀感與政策整體滿意度之間關連性的探討。 [研究方法與資料] 透過國家衛生研究院「衛生醫療體系優先順序之制定的研究」於2007年12月1日至12月24日以電話訪問調查所蒐集的2478份有效樣本為主要資料來源，以排序性常態機率模型（ordered probit）統計方法。其中「健保整體滿意度」為依變項，自變項則包含了基本人口社經背景以及有關效率與效能面和公平性面向的指標。 [研究結果與建議] 統計分析結果發現，與民眾健保整體滿意度有顯著關聯的變項包含：人口社經背景變項中，「年齡」的老年人口及「居住地」；效率與效能面指標中的「主觀健保品質」、「民眾對健保服務的價值認知(效能)」及「民眾付出之健保價格負擔(效率)」；公平性面向指標中，民眾對健保「決策公平性」的評價、民眾在「健康的人是否應分擔生病的人的醫療費用」這方面的「實質公平性」觀點以及在「發聲管道」標準的「程序公平性」的態度。從這些實證結果可看出，除了過去一直被強調的效率與效能指標對健保整體滿意度產生顯著影響，民眾對健保政策的主觀公平性觀感也被證實與整體滿意度有顯著關連；顯示政府進行民眾滿意度調查時，若未能包括公平性面向指標，調查可能會有盲點而無法偵測到民眾評價政策的一些關鍵條件。但本研究亦發現民眾對健保政策以外的公平性態度並未顯著的影響健保滿意度，因此，民眾滿意度調查中測量公平性觀感必需具有明確的政策背景。
In the past three decades, new public management (NPM) has had a great impact on the field of public administration. Among the impacts, “customer orientation” is the most significant one. For the purpose of evaluating citizen satisfaction with government services, public agencies begin to use the Customer Satisfaction Survey (CSS) mainly designed and administered by business managers. However, after reviewing the content of the CSS questionnaires, we find that the emphasized values behind the CSS are efficiency and effectiveness rather than equality, which is sometimes the main value behind public service delivery. Whether the value of equality will influence citizens’ level of satisfaction is the main research question in this thesis. We took Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) as a case study, and used a citizen survey on priority setting by the NHI from the National Health Research Institutes in late 2007 as secondary data. The dependent variable in our citizen satisfaction ordered probit model is “NHI satisfaction.”, and explanatory variables included demographic backgrounds, indexes of efficiency or effectiveness, and indexes of equality. The results show that efficiency and effectiveness have a significant association with NHI satisfaction. Most importantly, citizens’ general evaluation of equality with regard to NHI also has a significant impact on NHI satisfaction. Based on the results, we suggest that the application of CSS in public service evaluation should include an index of equality in order to capture a holistic picture of citizen satisfaction.
期刊論文
1.江逸之(20080924)。2008年幸福城市大調查--永續管理比盲目建設重要。天下雜誌，406，102-107。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉宜君、傅立葉(20090600)。以政策德菲法建構健保政策評估指標之研究。國家與社會，6，103-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李妙純、沈茂庭(20080600)。全民健保下不同所得群體醫療利用不均因素分析。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，27(3)，223-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tsuchiya, A.、Miguel, L. S.、Edlin, R.、Wailoo, A.、Dolan, P.(2005)。Procedural Justice in Public Healthcare Resource Allocation。Applied Health Economics and Health Policy，4(2)，119-127。  new window
5.江東亮、文羽苹、謝嘉容(20140100)。全民健康保險制度的發展與問題。臺灣醫學，18(1)，33-42。  延伸查詢new window
6.Daniels, Norman、Sabin, James(1998)。The Ethics of Accountability in Managed Care Reform。Health Affairs，17(5)，50-64。  new window
7.Boyne, G. A.(2002)。Public and private management: What's the difference?。Journal of Management Studies，39(1)，97-122。  new window
8.Ross, C. K.、Steward, C. A.、Sinacore, J. M.(1993)。The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction。Medical Care，31(12)，1138-1149。  new window
9.王頌華、楊長興、鍾信成、陳巧珊(20070400)。全民健保實施對社經狀況不同地區的國民死亡率影響之研究--以時間數列分析。澄清醫護管理雜誌，3(2)，32-45。  延伸查詢new window
10.Chen, D. Y.、Huang, T. Y.、Hsiao, N. Y.(2006)。Reinventing government through on-line citizen involvement in the developing world: A case study of Taipei city mayor's E-mail box in Taiwan。Public Administration and Development，26(5)，409-423。  new window
11.劉宜君(20010900)。我國全民健康保險政策財務之實證研究。中國行政評論，10(4)，129-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Terry, Larry D.(1998)。Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement。Public Administration Review，58(3)，194-200。  new window
13.林水波、陳志瑋(19990600)。顧客導向的政府再造策略。政治科學論叢，10，319-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Vigoda, Eran(2002)。From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration。Public Administration Review，62(5)，527-540。  new window
15.DeLeon, Linda、Denhardt, Robert B.(2000)。The Political Theory of Reinvention。Public Administration Review，60(2)，89-97。  new window
16.Olsen, J. A.(1997)。Theories of Justice and Their Implications for Priority Setting in Health Care。Journal of Health Economics，16(6)，625-639。  new window
17.陳敦源(19990600)。顧客導向的省思與再突破：尋找服務的誘因結構。空大行政學報，9，209-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張睿詒、江東亮(19981000)。風險校正：健康保險市場的效率與公平之關鍵。中華公共衛生雜誌，17(5)，373-380。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Brown, K.、Coulter, P. B.(1983)。Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery。Public Administration Review，43(1)，50-58。  new window
20.鄭文輝(20010600)。Social Health Insurance in Taiwan: Current Status and Perspectives。保險專刊，64，1-45。new window  new window
21.蔡允棟(20010300)。官僚組織回應的概念建構評析--新治理的觀點。中國行政評論，10(2)，89-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.李昭琴、盧瑞芬(20131000)。臺灣兒童之健康平等及醫療照護利用公平性探討。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，32(5)，449-462。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.林美姿、黃漢華(2009)。竹市三連貫，高縣桃縣中市苗縣登五星。遠見雜誌，276，108-114。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳敦源、王光旭(20170300)。公共服務與政府效能：民主治理下之公正價值觀點。國土及公共治理，5(1)，7-18。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳敦源、李仲彬(20101000)。探索公民心靈：「公民調查」技術的理論與實務。研考雙月刊，34(5)=279，53-66。  延伸查詢new window
26.Andrews, Rhys、Van de Walle, Steven(2013)。New Public Management and Citizens' Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness。Public Management Review，15(5)，762-783。  new window
27.Allison, M. T.(2000)。Leisure, Diversity and Social Justice。Journal of Leisure Research，32(1)，2-6。  new window
28.Dolinsky, A. L.、Caputo, R. K.(1990)。The Role of Health Care Attributes and Demographic Characteristics in the Determination of Health Care Satisfaction。Journal of Health Care Marketing，10(4)，31-39。  new window
29.Brown, T.(2007)。Coercion versus Choice: Citizen Evaluations of Public Service Quality across Methods of Consumption。Public Administration Review，67(3)，559-572。  new window
30.Dunn, William N.、Miller, David Y.(2007)。A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform。Public Organization Review，7，345-358。  new window
31.Etter, J. F.、Perneger, T. V.(1997)。Validating A Satisfaction Questionnaire Using Multiple Approaches: a Case Study。Social Science & Medicine，45(6)，879-885。  new window
32.Haviland, M. G.、Morales, L. S.、Dial, T. H.、Pincus, H. A.(2005)。Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction with Health Care。American Journal of Medical Quality，20(4)，195-203。  new window
33.Grube, Dennis(2013)。In Search of Society? The Limitations of Citizen-Centered Governance。The Political Quarterly，84(3)，371-379。  new window
34.Morley, Louise(1997)。Change and Equality in Higher Education。British Journal of Sociology of Education，18(2)，231-242。  new window
35.Hsu, C. C.、Chen, L.、Hu, Y. W.、Yip, W.、Shu, C. C.(2006)。The Dimensions of Responsiveness of a Health System: a Taiwanese Perspective。BMC Public Health，6，72。  new window
36.Jilke, Sebastian(2015)。Choice and Equality: Are Vulnerable Citizens Worse off After Liberalization Reforms?。Public Adminisration，93(1)，68-85。  new window
37.Kluegel, J. R.、Mason, D. S.(2004)。Fairness Matters: Social Justice and Political Legitimacy in Post-Communist Europe。Europe-Asia Studies，56(6)，813-834。  new window
38.Musa, R.、Pallister, J.、Robson, M.(2005)。The Roles of Perceived Value, Perceived Equity and Relational Commitment in a Disconfirmation Paradigm Framework: An Initial Assessment in a 'Relationship-Rich' Consumption Environment。Advances in Consumer Research，32，349-357。  new window
39.Poister, T. H.、Henry, G. T.(1994)。Citizen Ratings of Public and Private Service Quality: A Comparative Perspective。Public Administration Review，54(2)，155-160。  new window
40.Rosén, P.、Karlberg, I.(2002)。Opinions of Swedish Citizens, Health-care Politicians, Administrators and Doctors on Rationing and Health-care Financing。Health Expect，5(2)，148-155。  new window
41.Sprigings, N.(2002)。Delivering Public Services under the New Public Management: The Case of Public Housing。Public Money & Management，22(4)，11-17。  new window
42.Rothstein, B.、Teorell, J.(2008)。What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions。Governance，21(2)，165-190。  new window
43.Vigoda, E.、Yuval, F.(2004)。A National Assessment Project of Public Administration: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Findings from Israel。Public Administation Quarterly，28(4)，501-537。  new window
44.陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂、郭思禹(20060600)。官僚回應性與內部顧客關係管理：臺北市政府市長信箱個案研究。行政暨政策學報，42，143-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.余致力(20000100)。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色--黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示。公共行政學報，4，1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.吳瓊恩(20021200)。公共行政學發展趨勢的探究--三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論的基礎。公共行政學報，7，173-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Denhardt, Robert B.、Denhardt, Janet Vinzant(2000)。The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering。Public Administration Review，60(6)，549-559。  new window
48.Oliver, Richard L.(1980)。A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions。Journal of Marketing Research，17(4)，460-469。  new window
49.許立一(20020300)。新公共管理的省思：以黑堡觀點為基礎。公共行政學報，6，29-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.Kelly, J. M.(2005)。The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration。Public Administration Review，65(1)，76-84。  new window
51.Ware, J. E. Jr.、Snyder, M. K.、Wright, W. R.、Davies, A. R.(1983)。Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care。Evaluation and Program Planning，6(3/4)，247-263。  new window
會議論文
1.陳敦源、陳麗光、黃東益、呂佳螢(2008)。公共行政研究中之正義制度的設計與執行：以全民健保資源配置機制為例。2008年全國公共行政系所聯合會年會，(會議日期: 2008/05/24-05/25)。臺中：東海大學公共行政暨政策學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉秀珍(1999)。全民健保健康照護服務輸送之公平性考量--台灣的實證分析。「家庭、社會政策及其財務策略國際」學術研討會，(會議日期: 4月16-17日)。中華民國社會福利學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cumberford, J.、Gordon, G.、Sinha, N. N.(1999)。The Creation of a National Citizen Satisfaction Index。ASQ's 53rd Annual Quality Congress，595-600。  new window
研究報告
1.劉宜君、傅立葉、陳政昌(2008)。從民眾觀點建構健保評量指標。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧瑞芬(2002)。亞太地區國家醫療財務、醫療照護體系及民眾健康狀態的公平性探討 (計畫編號：DOH91-PL-1003)。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧瑞芬(2004)。亞太地區國家醫療財務、醫療照護體系及民眾健康狀態的公平性探討 (計畫編號：DOH93-PL-1001)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Barry, Brian(2005)。Why Social Justice Matters。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
2.Vermunt, R.、Törnblom, K. Y.(2007)。Distributive and Procedural Justice : Research and Social Applications。Aldershot：Ashgate。  new window
3.World Health Organization(2000)。The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance。World Health Organization。  new window
4.Okun, Arthur M.(1975)。Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff。Washington, DC：The Brookings Institution。  new window
5.Nagel, Stuart S.(1984)。Public Policy: Goals, Means, and Methods。New York：St. Martin's Press。  new window
6.Frederickson, H. G.(2010)。Social Equity and Public Administration: Origins, Developments, and Applications。Armonk, NY：M. E. Sharpe。  new window
7.Rawls, John(1971)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Frederickson, H. George(1997)。The Spirit of Public Administration。Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.Röhl, K. F.(1997)。Procedural Justice: Introduction and Overview。Procedural Justice。Aldershot：Ashgate。  new window
2.Green, Richard T.、Hubbell, Lawrence(1996)。On Governance and Reinventing Government。Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Allison, G. T. Jr.(1983)。Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?。Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives。Palo Alto, CA：Mayfield。  new window
4.Harrow, J.(2002)。New Public Management and Social Justice: Just Efficiency or Equity as Well?。New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects。New London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：467（臺灣：459，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67629844
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上