朝鮮正祖《詩經講義》與抄啟文臣間的問答紀錄，是朝鮮詩經學現存文獻最豐富的材料，反映了朝鮮時期詩經學研究的盛況，值得關注。本文分析《詩經講義》解《詩》觀點立場及君臣問對的策略，總結出四個特色：第一，問題導向的論學模式深化了《詩經》研究內涵，第二，反思朱子說《詩》聚訟，強化懲創感發功能，第三，不事繁瑣考證，固守性理以求《詩》，第四，推闡比興言外意旨，追摹聖人天道。而因君臣條問條對機制，受限於君上臣下的封建階層限制，問對結果呈現以朱子為依歸，新創見解少，以及訓詁考據知識薄弱，說《詩》難有突破的局限。

This research is trying to analyze the views of the Shijing Jianɡyì based on their positions and strategies of the monarch and courtiers respectively. The results show four characteristics as follow: First, the mode of Argumentation is orientated by questions (Ploblem-Based Learning), which deepened the research connotations of the Shijing. Second, the different interpretations of Zhu Xi’s explanation of Shijing by the ancient Korean scholars amplified the functions of Shijing in enlightenment of punishment and encouragement. Third, they abandoned to attach the tedious verification of Shijing but adhered to the interpretation by the Neo-Confucianism of Song Dynasty in ancient China. Fourth, they expanded the implications of Shijing so as to follow the original meanings of saints. However, this study also revealed its two limitations. First of all, the Q & A among the feudal monarch and the courtiers showed little innovative insights .It is almost the same as Zhu Xi’s interpretation. In addition, the general ability of their textual research and verification was weak. Therefore, it would be difficult for them to have a breakthrough on their interpretation of Shijing.