:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Theory of Plato's Eikōs Logos or Eikōs Muthos
書刊名:臺大文史哲學報
作者:羅月美 引用關係
作者(外文):Loh, Yip-mei
出版日期:2017
卷期:88
頁次:頁157-188
主題關鍵詞:表象複本形似的神話相似性典範AppearanceCopyEikōs muthosLikenessParadigm
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
柏拉圖把可感的世界切割為:「意見」(pistis)與「猜測」(eikasia)。鑑於此,他提出圖像的兩個種類:眾相(Forms)的圖像與在水裡以及在鏡子裡的眾物體之圖像。他在《蒂邁歐》以「形似的演說」或者「形似的神話」之學說描寫相如何居住在靈魂之內以及個別事物如何分有相。此篇論文採取兩個步驟去澄清「形似的演說」之真正的概念。第一、從羅馬的哲學家西賽羅(Cicero)開始到現代的學者去分析各種的爭論。第二、澄清形容詞「形似的」(eikōs)的意義以便研究在相似性與典範之間的關係之核心的解釋。接著進一步檢驗希臘名詞 「圖像」(eikōn)的概念以揭露在複本與典範之間的關係。在這些的概念被探究之後,可預期的,「相似的技藝」不同於「表象的技藝」將清晰地被展示出來。
Plato divides the sensible world into two parts: pistis (view) and eikasia (conjecture), and because of this he proposes two kinds of picture or image: that of Forms and that of bodies in water and in mirrors. His Timaeus deciphers how the Form indwells within the soul and how individual things partake of the Form with the aid of his doctrine of eikōs logos or eikōs muthos. This article adopts two procedures to clarify the true concept of "eikōs muthos" or "eikōs logos." The first is to analyze the controversies, from the Roman philosopher Cicero to contemporary scholars, and the second is to clarify the meaning of the adjective "eikōs" (Eikwc) so as to investigate his core explanation of the relationship between similarity and paradigm. Then the concept of the Greek noun "eikōn" (Eikwv) is further examined to reveal the relationship between copies and paradigm. Following this, it is hoped that the separation of the technē of likeness from that of appearance will be clearly shown.
圖書
1.Plato、Cooper, John M.、Hutchinson, D. S.(1997)。Plato: Complete Works。Hackett Publishing Company。  new window
2.Peters, F. E.(1967)。Greek philosophical terms: A historical lexicon。New York:New York University Press。  new window
3.Böhme, Gernot(2000)。Plato theoretische Philosophie。Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft。  new window
4.Böhme, Gernot、Böhme, Hartmut(1996)。Feuer, Wasser, Erde, Luft。München:Verlag C. H. Beck oHG。  new window
5.Böhme, Gernot(1996)。Idee und Kosmos: Platons Zeitlehre: eine Einführung in seine theoretische Philosophie。Frankfurt am Main:Vittorio Klostermann GmhH。  new window
6.Aristotle、Goold, G. P.、Wicksteed, P. H.、Comford, F. M.(1996)。Physics。London:Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Allen, R. E.(1983)。Plato's Parmenides: Translation and Analysis。Oxford:Basil Blackwell Publisher。  new window
8.Johansen, Thomas Kjeller(2004)。Plato's Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Cornford, Francis Macdonald(1937)。Plato's Cosmology: the Timaeus of Plato。Routledge und Kegan Paul Ltd.。  new window
10.Cicero, Marcus Tullius、von Bayer, Karl(2006)。Timaeus über das Weltall。Düsseldorf:Artemis & Winkler Verlag。  new window
11.Morgan, Kathryn A.(2000)。Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Hardy, Jörg(2001)。Platons Theorie des Wissens im Thaeitet。Göttingen:Vandenboeck und Ruprecht。  new window
13.Plato、Goold, G. P.(1999)。Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press, the Loeb Classical Library。  new window
14.Platon、von Widdra, Klaus、von Mukker, Hiemoymus、Schleiertnacher, Friedrich(1990)。Platon Werke in acht Banden Griechisch und Deutsch。Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft。  new window
15.Peters, F. E.(1967)。Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon。London:University of London Press Limited。  new window
16.Plato、Goold, G. P.(1996)。Theaetetus, Sophist。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press, the Loeb Classical Library。  new window
17.Plato、Goold, G. P.(1999)。Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press, the Loeb Classical Library。  new window
18.Taylor, A. E.(1928)。A Commentary on Plato's Timaeus。Oxford:The Clarendon Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Burnyeat, M. F.(2009)。Eikōs muthos。Plato's Myths。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Brisson, Luc(2012)。Why is the Timaeus called an Eikōs Muthos and an Eikōs Logos?。Plato and Myth: Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths。Leiden:Koninklijke Brill NV。  new window
3.Mesch, Walter(2002)。Die Bildlichkeit der platonischen Kosmologie. Zum Verhaltnis von Logos und Mythos im Timaios。Plato als Mythologe: Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen。Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft。  new window
4.Horn, Christoph(2011)。Enthält das Symposion Platons Theorie der Liebe?。Plato: Symposion。Berlin:Akademie Verlag。  new window
5.Pikkarainen, Eetu(2012)。Signs of Reality: The idea of General Bildung by J. A. Comenius。Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and Controversies Between Continental Educational Thinking and American Pragmatism。Sense Publishers。  new window
6.Sedley, David(1999)。The Ideal of Godlikeness。Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion, and the Soul。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Schnitt, Arbogast(2002)。Mythos und Vemunft bei Platon。Platon als Mythologe: Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen。Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellscaft。  new window
8.Sedley, David(2010)。Hesiod's Theogony and Plato's Timaeus。Plato and Hesiod。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Siljander, Pauli、Sutinen, Ari(2012)。[Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and Controversies Between Continental Educational Thinking and American Pragmatism] Introduction。Theories of Bildung and Growth: Connections and Controversies Between Continental Educational Thinking and American Pragmatism。Netherlands:Sense Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE