:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:室內設計之新評分方法
書刊名:建築學報
作者:呂文堯 引用關係王維歆郭倩彣林敏哲 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Wen-yaoWang, Wei-xinKuo, Chien-wenLin, Ming-che
出版日期:2018
卷期:103
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:模糊偏好順序評價法層級分析法偏好順序評價法模糊德菲法Fuzzy TOPSISAnalytic hierarchy processAHPTOPSISFuzzy Delphi method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:7
本文採用模糊偏好順序評價法(Fuzzy TOPSIS)及層級分析法(AHP)結合偏好順序評價法(TOPSIS)來進行室內設計評分,期望能建立一套客觀的室內設計新評分方法。本研究先由現有的參考文獻中取得6個室內設計評分準則。再透過專家問卷結果並藉由模糊德菲法,刪除其中一個未通過篩選門檻之評分準則。研究結果顯示,Fuzzy TOPSIS或AHP結合TOPSIS 皆可得到客觀之評分結果。Fuzzy TOPSIS之分析程序較AHP結合TOPSIS複雜,然而Fuzzy TOPSIS之問卷調查執行方式及操作過程則較AHP結合TOPSIS簡單。
This study proposes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) as well as Fuzzy TOPSIS to assess the interior design diagrams. Six criteria to assess the interior design diagram are obtained firstly from the available references. One criterion is deleted using the Fuzzy Delphi Method through the results of experts' questionnaires. The present study indicates that the rankings order of interior design diagram assessment can be determined objectively by either the AHP integrated TOPSIS or the Fuzzy TOPSIS. The analysis procedure of Fuzzy TOPSIS is more complicate than that of AHP integrated TOPSIS. However, the work of experts' questionnaires of Fuzzy TOPSIS is much easier than those of AHP integrated TOPSIS.
期刊論文
1.王紀鯤(19990900)。建築教育中的評圖制度。建築學報,30,93-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsu, Yulung、Lee, Chenghaw、Kreng, V. B.(2010)。The application of fuzzy delphi method and fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection。Expert Systems with Applications,37(1),419-425。  new window
3.Ertuğrul, İ.、Karakaşoğlu, N.(2008)。Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection。The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,39(7/8),783-795。  new window
4.Ashrafzadeh, M.、Rafiei, F. M.、Isfahani, N. M.、Zare, Z.(2012)。Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study。Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business,3(9),655-671。  new window
5.Liu, W. K.(2013)。Application of the fuzzy Delphi method and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for the managerial competence of multinational corporation executives。International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and, e-Learning,3(4),313-317。  new window
6.Yüksel, İ.(2012)。An integrated approach with group decision-making for strategy selection in SWOT analysis。International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,2(11),134-161。  new window
7.呂文堯、陳葶栩、張震鐘(20150900)。以TOPSIS法評估室內設計圖。技術學刊,30(3),151-161。  延伸查詢new window
8.畢威寧(20050600)。結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商績效評估之研究。科學與工程技術期刊,1(1),75-83。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chen, Chen-Tung(2000)。Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-making under Fuzzy Environment。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114(1),1-9。  new window
10.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
圖書
1.Hwang, C. L.、Yoon, K.(1981)。Multiple Attributes Decision Making Method and Application。Springer。  new window
2.Saaty, Thomas L.(1980)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。McGraw-Hill。  new window
其他
1.(2013)。第六屆夆禾盃全國室內設計競圖比賽(2013)活動辦法簡章,http://design.apex.tw/designaward/2013/activ04.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2013)。第二屆特力家居盃全國室內設計競圖大賽辦法,http://www.cycu-iidc.org/decorhouse/。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE