本文以一系列提問與回應串聯起來，旨在澄清課程研究的再概念化思想如何擴散且影響著體育師資培育領域，特別是這個領域的課程研究。本文先藉由闡述課程理論再概念化學派的發展背景、研究立場與持續影響，標示出其理論價值，並以之作為本文研究反思之依據；其次，在嘗試處理再概念化運動對教育領域的影響效力之問題時，本文突顯出研究領域和學科屬性在進行學術討論過程中的重要意義，藉以聚焦研究範疇至體育師資培育的課程研究；再次，經蒐尋與分析學術刊物之研究文獻，本文得以討論再概念化課程研究成果對體育師資培育課程研究產生了何種作用之問題，指明一種單面向的認識偏態後，再與再概念化的解放精神進行對話；最後，本文建議未來的體育師資培育課程研究應轉而關注其發生情境與經驗內涵，同時採取其它描述方法進行現象的紀錄與研究，以展現此種課程現象的經驗特殊性並促發其理論化進程。

This paper connected a serious of questions and corresponding responses aiming to clarify how the curriculum reconceptualists' thinking diffused and influenced the field of physical education teacher education (PETE), especially those curriculum studies in this field. First, this paper delineated the historical background, academic standpoint and continuous impact of reconceptualization paradigm in curriculum theory, identifying its theoretical value and adopting it as the basis of reflection. Second, in order to understand the impact of the reconceptualization movement on the field of education, this paper highlighted the important meanings of the differences of the field of inquiry and attribute of discipline in the process of academic debate, and narrow down our scope of inquiry to the curriculum studies in PETE. Third, by collecting and analyzing the research literature published in a renowned journal, this paper was able to discuss the question of what effects the research of curriculum reconceptualization had on the curriculum studies of PETE and the issue of emancipation advocated by reconceptualists after pointing out one-dimensioned skewness of knowing in contemporary discourse. Last, this paper suggested that future PETE curriculum studies should turn to concern the lived circumstances and the connotation of experiences which make PETE curriculum being itself, and to utilize descriptive method as a way of capturing and studying it for both revealing the specificity of experiences of PETE curriculum and initiating its theorizing process.