:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地緣強權夾縫中的捷克--國際現實與務實下的生存之道
書刊名:臺灣國際研究季刊
作者:鄭得興 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, James Ter-hsing
出版日期:2017
卷期:13:4
頁次:頁57-73
主題關鍵詞:捷克中東歐地緣政治務實主義理想主義現實主義Czech RepublicCentral and Eastern EuropeGeopoliticsPragmatismIdealismRealism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:2
捷克人的小國生存之道首先是因為他們能夠順從其歷史性格,而等待其歷史契機,捷克人一直在等待每個歷史發展機會,當危機來臨時,捷克人知道無需硬碰硬去鬥個你死我活,因為捷克文化的根紮得很深,只要文化不滅,民族就會長存。本文探討重點有三:首先,捷克在近代中東歐地緣政治的架構下,相對是個小國,但捷克為何能突破種種歷史困境而生存下來,並且求得發展?其次,捷克的小國生存之道,以捷克自身視角觀之,有何理論根據?第三,捷克的小國生存之道,能給台灣什麼啟發?筆者認為捷克的生存或立國之道,主要有三:其一,重視民族文化、其二,掌握歷史契機、其三、強調務實主義。捷克人的理想是置於務實主義的脈絡下,小國生存之道是先求生存,再求發展。從捷克的小國生存之道來看,台灣或許應該多思考務實主義的可能性,而非僅限於理想主義與現實主義。
The first and foremost reason for the survival of the Czechs is that they can conform to their historical character, while waiting for the historical opportunity; that is, the Czechs have been waiting every opportunity for historical development. The Czechs know no need to fight a battle, when the crisis comes, because the roots of the Czech culture were so deep that the nation would endure as long as the culture did not die. This article focuses on three main questions: first, the Czech Republic in modern Central and Eastern Europe under the framework of geopolitics, relatively a small country, but why the Czech Republic can break through the various historical difficulties and survive and develop? Secondly, what is the theoretical basis of the Czech own viewpoint for the survival of such a small country? Thirdly, what is the inspiration for Taiwan from the lesson of the Czech survival? The author thinks that at least three main points to narrate the existence of the Czech survival, first, understanding the importance of national culture; secondly, holding on the historical opportunity; thirdly, emphasizing pragmatism. The author states that the Czech people's ideals are placed in a pragmatic context, the small country is to try survival first, and then to seek development. From the perspective of the survival of the small Czech Republic, Taiwan may need to think more about the possibility of pragmatism than about idealism and realism.
期刊論文
1.Assmann, Aleida(2008)。Transformations between History and Memory。Social Research,75(1),49-72。  new window
2.Nedelsky, Nadya(2004)。Divergent Responses to a Common Past: Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia。Theory and Society,33(1),65-115。  new window
3.Ignatieff, Michale(1995)。On Civil Society, Why Eastern Europe's Revolutions Could Succeed。Foreign Affairs,74(2),128-136。  new window
4.Kuus, Merje(2004)。Europe's Eastern Expansion and the Reinscription of Otherness in East-Central Europe。Progress in Human Geography,28(4),472-489。  new window
5.Whitefield, Stephen(2002)。Political Cleavages and Post-communist Politics。Annual Review Political Science,5,181-200。  new window
6.Hampl, Martin、Dostal, Petr、Drbohlav, Dusan(2007)。Social and Cultural geography in the Czech Republic: under pressures of globalization and post-totalitarian transformation。Social and Cultural Geography,8(3),475-493。  new window
7.Hilde, Paal Sigurd(1999)。Slovak Nationalism and the Break-Up of Czechoslovakia。Europe-Asia Studies,51(4),647-665。  new window
8.Čermáková, Zdena、Holda, Dalibor(2001)。Changing Values among Czech Students before and after November 1989。European Journal of Education,27(3),303-314。  new window
9.Crawford, Keith(2004)。Czech President Václav Klaus: Euroskeptic or Eurorealist?。New Presence,6(3),25-26。  new window
10.Faro, Jeremy、Hobolt, Sara Binzer、Klemenčič, Manja(2003)。Lost and Found: 'New' National Identities in the European Union。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,16(2),203-205。  new window
11.Myant, Martin、Smith, Simon(2006)。Regional Development and Post-Communist Politics in a Czech Region。Europe-Asia Studies,58(2),147-168。  new window
12.鄭得興、張家銘(20131200)。國家認同差異性下之集體記憶框架--捷克及斯洛伐克分裂後的年輕世代。臺灣國際研究季刊,9(4),115-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭得興(20080300)。中東歐的市民社會與民主發展之比較研究。臺灣國際研究季刊,4(1),67-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Agnew, Hugh(2004)。The Czechs and the Lands of the Bohemian Crown。Stanford, CA:Hoover Institution Press。  new window
2.Berend, Ivan T.(2003)。History Derailed: Central and Eastern Europe in the Long Nineteenth Century。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
3.Dowling, Maria(2002)。Brief Histories: Czechoslovakia。London:Arnold。  new window
4.Innes, Abby(2001)。Czechoslovakia: The Short Goodbye。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
5.Musil, Jiri(2000)。The End of Czechoslovakia。Budapest:Central European University Press。  new window
6.Panek, Jaroslav、Tuma, Oldrich(2009)。A History of the Czech Lands。Prague:Karolinum Press。  new window
7.Polisensky, J. V.(1991)。History of Czechoslovakia in Outline。Prague:Bohemia International。  new window
8.Wandycz, Piotr S.(1992)。The Price of Freedom: A History of East Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the Present。London:Routledge。  new window
9.Leff, Carol Skalnik(1997)。The Czech and Slovak Republics: Nation versus State。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press。  new window
10.Harn, Josef、Fiser, Rudolf(1998)。Dejiny Ceskych Zemi。Prague:Fortuna。  new window
11.Jenkins, Keith、賈士蘅(2009)。歷史的再思考。台北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
12.Coser, Lewis A.、孫立平(1991)。社會衝突的功能。台北市:久大。  延伸查詢new window
13.Rieck, Christian E.(2007)。"Co je Evropa?" Střední Evropa。Prague:Institut Pro Středoevropskou Kulturu a Politiku。  new window
14.Gellner, Ernest、李金梅、黃俊龍(2001)。國族與國族主義。聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Halbwachs, Maurice、畢然、郭金華(2002)。論集體記憶。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Anderson, Benedict Richard O'Gorman、吳叡人(2010)。想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布。時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄭得興(2013)。中東歐國家之歷史遺緒與轉型正義--以捷克及斯洛伐克為例。轉型正義。台北:台灣國際研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brodský, Jiří(2001)。The Czech Experience of Identity。National and European Identities in EU Enlargement: Views from Central and Eastern Europe。Prague:Institute of International Relations。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE