:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:好奇、焦慮與因應效能對探索行為的影響效果
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:何文澤 引用關係葉光輝
作者(外文):Ho, Wen-tsoYeh, Kuang-hui
出版日期:2018
卷期:41:2
頁次:頁59-80
主題關鍵詞:因應效能好奇心探索行為焦慮感學習動機Coping efficacyCuriosityExploratory behaviorAnxietyLearning motivation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:4
好奇心一向被認為是人類探索未知的驅力,Spielberger與Starr(1994)提出探索行為雙歷程理論(dual process theory of exploratory behavior),主張新奇事物會引發個體的好奇心,驅使其探索該刺激,但也可能引發個體的焦慮感,迫使其遠離該刺激。兩者的作用效果相互拮抗,共同決定個體是否持續探索該刺激。然而,過去研究並未直接驗證此理論觀點,本研究設計了實驗直接檢證之,並納入社會認知理論的自我效能觀點,操弄參與者對新奇事物的因應效能,影響個體的焦慮感。參與者共86位,隨機分派至實驗組或控制組。參與者需對未知的抽象畫評定好奇程度、焦慮程度與探索意願。結果顯示:對畫作的好奇度與焦慮度能共同預測個體探索意願的高低,支持了雙歷程理論。另外,比起因應效能較低的畫,個體對因應效能較高的畫作較不焦慮,亦更願意探索,但好奇度則無變化,代表因應效能會影響個體的焦慮感。未來可將研究結果應用在教育課程設計上,結合學習動機理論,測量學生的好奇與焦慮傾向,識別容易不想探索新課程的學生與背後的原因。另一方面,創新的課程或教學方式對高焦慮的學生不一定有幫助。若學生的因應效能較低,創新課程與教法會讓學生過度焦慮,裹足不前。
Curiosity is the drive to unknown. Spielberger and Starr (1994) proposed the dual process theory of exploratory behavior, indicating that novel stimuli triggered one’s curiosity to explore it, and triggered one’s anxiety to avoid it. They co-determined the duration and intensity of exploratory behavior. However, no any past study directly validated the theory. This study not only tested this theory but also integrated the perspective of social cognition theory, introducing coping efficacy to the framework. Manipulated coping efficacy of novel stimuli would influence one’s anxiety and then his exploratory behavior. Eighty-six participants were randomly assigned to two experiment groups and a control group. Facing two titles of abstract paintings, participants reported their degree of curiosity, anxiety, and the willingness to explore them. Results showed that the combination of curiosity and anxiety of paintings predicted the willingness to explore paintings, supporting the dual process theory. In experiment groups, participants felt less anxious toward and more willing to explore the higher coping efficacy painting than the lower one, indicating the theoretical importance of coping efficacy in the context of learning motivation. There are potential applications of the results in curriculum design. Measuring students’ deposition of curiosity and anxiety would indicate students that easily withdraw from learning and the reason behind their withdrawal. Moreover, innovative learning material might backfire on high anxious students, making them more anxious.
期刊論文
1.王珩(20051200)。從ARCS模式探討英語學習動機之激發策略。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,19(2),89-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Loewenstein, George(1994)。The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation。Psychological Bulletin,116(1),75-98。  new window
3.張靜儀(20050600)。國小自然科教學個案研究--以ARCS動機模式解析。科學教育學刊,13(2),191-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Keller, John M.(1987)。Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design。Journal of Instructional Development,10(3),2-10。  new window
5.Litman, J. A.、Spielberger, C. D.(2003)。Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components。Journal of Personality Assessment,80(1),75-86。  new window
6.Litman, J. A.(2005)。Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information。Cognition & Emotion,19(6),793-814。  new window
7.許淑致(19981200)。ARCS動機設計模式在教學上之應用。國教輔導,38(2)=328,16-24。  延伸查詢new window
8.惲大宗(20140200)。樂在學習趣味無窮--ARCS動機模式在體育教學的實踐。學校體育,24(1)=140,35-44。  延伸查詢new window
9.Grossnickle, E. M.(2016)。Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts。Educational Psychology Review,28(1),23-60。  new window
10.Kashdan, T. B.、Roberts, J. E.(2006)。Affective outcomes in superficial and intimate interactions: Roles of social anxiety and curiosity。Journal of Research in Personality,40(2),140-167。  new window
11.Peters, R. A.(1978)。Effects of anxiety, curiosity, and perceived instructor threat on student verbal behavior in the college classroom。Journal of Educational Psychology,70(3),388-395。  new window
12.Pintrich, Paul R.、De Groot, Elisabeth V.(1990)。Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40。  new window
13.Bandura, A.(1988)。Self-Efficacy Conception of Anxiety。Anxiety Research,1(2),77-98。  new window
14.Fredrickson, Barbara L.(2001)。The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions。American Psychologist,56(3),218-226。  new window
15.Kashda, T. B.、Roberts, J. E.(2004)。Trait and state curiosity in the genesis of intimacy: Differentiation from related constructs。Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,23(6),792-816。  new window
圖書
1.Berlyne, D. E.(1960)。Conflict, arousal and curiosity。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.Spielberger, C. D.(1995)。Revised state-trait personality inventory。Palo Alto, CA:Mind Garden。  new window
3.Cicero, M. T.、Rackham, H.(1914)。De finibus bonorum et malorum。London:New York:W. Heinemann:The Macmillan。  new window
4.James, William(1890)。The principles of psychology。Henry Holt & Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Spielberger, C. D.、Starr, L. M.(1994)。Curiosity and exploratory behavior。Motivation: Theory and research。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Trudewind, C.(2000)。Curiosity and anxiety as motivational determinants of cognitive development。Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development。New York, NY:Elsevier Science。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE