:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方政府節能誘因採用之研究--以政治市場觀點切入之實證調查
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:陳均豪陳思先 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Jun-haoChen, Ssu-hsien
出版日期:2018
卷期:24:3
頁次:頁82-127
主題關鍵詞:誘因機制地方政府節能政策政治市場Incentive mechanismLocal governmentEnergy saving policyPolitical market
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:14
本研究以地方政府公法人(直轄市、縣市、鄉/鎮/市、原住民自治區)為分析單位,以政治市場理論架構為基礎,探討影響地方政府採用節能誘因行動的影響因素為何,並將相關潛在因素分為政治市場需求面與政府組織供給面兩類,前者指涉地方政府對公民與不同團體支持度的感知,後者則指地方政府政策行動面的因素,包括政策優先性、政策合作、政策學習、補助資源及人力資源。本研究以普查方式針對地方政府公法人進行問卷調查,母體數量為226,實際回收156份問卷,回覆率69.03%,並以結構方程式模型(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)分析各變項的路徑影響效果。研究發現,屬於需求面因素的公民與團體支持度感知,對節能誘因機制的採用有直接與間接的影響力,而供給面因素中,除了節能政策優先性對節能誘因機制的採用無直接影響力之外,其他因素諸如與別的地方政府節能政策合作、政策學習、執行節能政策的人力資源與補助資源,皆對政策採用有幫助。
Starting from the political market framework, this research analyzes the factors influencing local government adoption of energy saving incentive mechanisms. The analytical unit is local municipal government (including special municipalities, counties, cities, townships, county-administered cities, and the self-government matters of mountain indigenous districts). The hypothesized factors are categorized into 1) the demand-side variables of the market consumers and 2) the supply-side variables of governmental machines. The former could be the perception of policy preference of local citizens and interest groups. The later could be the observed factors relevant to local government policy actions-including policy priority, interlocal collaboration, policy diffusion, financial resource and human resource. General survey is conducted with the population=226 municipalities. The total observation N=156 and the responsive rate=69.03%. The authors employs structural equation models to examine the path effect among the variables. Research findings indicate that the perception of market demands for the energy saving movement directly and indirectly influences the adoption of the incentive mechanisms in local governments. In the supply side, except the priority of energy policies, other factors including interlocal collaboration, policy diffusion, financial and human resource could generate a significant effect on the adoption of the incentive mechanisms.
期刊論文
1.林忠山(20030600)。民意影響公共政策之分析:衝突及動員的面向。華岡社科學報,17,59-83。  延伸查詢new window
2.何俊傑、張振平、游逸駿(20090600)。以經濟誘因工具刺激職業安全衛生管理投資之影響因子初步探討。勞工安全衛生研究季刊,17(2),190-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張世熒(20000600)。利益團體影響政府決策之研究。中國行政評論,9(3),23-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃東益(20040300)。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向:府際政策學習。國家政策季刊,3(1),135-153。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊武龍、戴興盛(20090800)。誘因排擠與社區保育集體行動:臺灣東部兩個案例之比較研究。地理學報,56,17-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hillman, A. J.、Hitt, M. A.(1999)。Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions。Academy of Management Review,24(4),825-842。  new window
7.余致力(20000900)。民意與公共政策:表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究。中國行政評論,9(4),81-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.梁明煌(20000600)。臺灣地區環保團體的角色與環保糾紛解決機制的變遷。環境與管理研究,1(1),79-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.湯京平、呂嘉泓(20020600)。永續發展與公共行政--從山美與里佳經驗談社區自治與「共享性資源」的管理。人文及社會科學集刊,14(2),261-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.羅時麒(20131000)。建築材料釋放揮發性有機化合物對室內空氣品質影響之研究。健康與建築雜誌,1(1),12-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1996)。Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions。Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,9(3),247-264。  new window
12.Ferris, James M.、Tang, Shui-Yan(1993)。The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview。Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory,3(1),4-10。  new window
13.史美強、蔡武軒(20001200)。網絡社會與治理概念初討。中國行政評論,10(1),33-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.曹俊漢(19790600)。美國環境保護政策:結構與功能的研究。美國研究,9(2),67-119。  延伸查詢new window
15.王俊豪、呂振福、陳昱廷、張宏浩(20140700)。友善環境農業誘因機制之研究--以稻米環境補貼為例。土地經濟年刊,25,1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.吳孟玲、陳亭如(20130500)。國際化、多角化、下方風險與誘因薪酬之關係探討。會計與財金研究,6(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張育哲(20090600)。地方政府採用誘因機制刺激經濟發展的省思。研習論壇,102,12-24。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bae, J.、Feiock, R. C.(2013)。Forms of government and climate change policies in US cities。Urban Studies,50(4),776-788。  new window
19.Hillman, A.、Keim, G.(1995)。International variation in the business-government interface: Institutional and organizational considerations。Academy of Management Review,20(1),193-214。  new window
20.Deslatte, A.(2016)。Boundaries and speed bumps: The role of modernized counties managing growth in the fragmented metropolis。Urban Affairs Review,53(4),658-688。  new window
21.Hawkins, C.(2014)。Competing interests and the political market for smart growth policy。Urban Studies,51(12),2503-2522。  new window
22.Yi, H.、Feiock, R. C.(2012)。Policy tool interactions and the adoption of State renewable portfolio standards。Review of Policy Research,29(2),193-206。  new window
23.Yi, H.、Feiock, R. C.(2014)。Renewable Energy Politics: Policy Typologies, Policy Tools and State Deployment of Renewables。Policy Studies Journal,42(3),391-415。  new window
學位論文
1.李炫陞(2003)。我國利益團體遊說活動之研究(碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Almond, Gabriel A.、Powell, G. B. Jr.(1966)。Comparative Polities: A Developmental Approach。Boston:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
2.Kooiman, Jan(1993)。Modern governance: New Government-society Interactions。Sage。  new window
3.吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。  new window
5.Kline, Rex B.(1998)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。Guilford Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Alston, L. J.(1996)。Empirical Work in Institutional Economics: an Overview。Empirical Studies in Institutional Change。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.蕭元哲(2010)。政治市場之議題價值與企業非市場策略意涵。公共政策與地方治理--地方自治論文集。台中:東海大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE