:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人地區數學素養教育效率比較
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:鄭永福許瑛玿 引用關係李哲迪
作者(外文):Cheng, Yung-fuHsu, Ying-shaoLee, Che-di
出版日期:2018
卷期:63:4
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:效率分解教育效率資料包絡分析數學素養國際學生能力評量計畫Data envelopment analysisDecomposition of efficiencyEducational efficiencyMathematical literacyPISA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究利用國際學生能力評量計畫2012年資料比較臺灣(只包括人口數大於100萬的七個大城市)、上海、香港與新加坡等四個華人地區的數學素養教育效率,並從教育效率的角度探討這四個地區數學教育的公平性。資料包絡分析法及效率分解法之分析結果顯示,臺灣與上海的「綜合效率」(含地區、學校與個人教育效率)、「地區與學校效率」與「地區系統效率」都是最高。然而,歸因於個人之無效率以臺灣與上海最高,歸因於學校之無效率在四個地區無顯著差異,歸因於地區之無效率以香港最高。在四個地區教育公平性方面,在高與低綜合教育效率學生之間,個人、學校與地區三個層級的無效率存在差異。具體而言,在個人層級,臺灣的無效率差異最大、上海次之;在學校層級,新加坡的無效率差異最大、臺灣次之;在地區層級,僅上海存在差異。總結而言,臺灣雖是數學素養教育效率最佳的兩個地區之一,然而,歸因於個人之無效率仍有相對較高的數值,且個人與學校之無效率也存在高與低教育效率學生之間差異過大的問題。此結果顯示,臺灣在個人和學校層級的教育效率仍有改進的空間。
This study uses data from the Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 to compare the educational efficiency of mathematical literacy and explore the educational equality of mathematics with educational efficiency across four ethnically Chinese regions, including Taiwan (containing seven cities with a population greater than 1 million), Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Data envelopment analysis and decomposition of efficiency revealed that Taiwan and Shanghai have the highest overall efficiency (the total of the regional, school, and individual levels), regional plus school efficiency (the total of the regional and school levels), and regional system efficiency. However, Taiwan and Shanghai have the most inefficiency at the individual level, and Hong Kong has the most inefficiency at the regional level. At the school level, there was no significant difference in terms of inefficiency among the four regions. Regarding educational equality among the four regions, there were significant differences in educational inefficiency at the individual, school, and regional levels between students with high and low overall educational efficiency. Specifically, at the individual level, Taiwan had the largest inefficiency difference between students with high and low overall efficiency, followed by Shanghai. At the school level, Singapore had the largest inefficiency difference, followed by Taiwan. At the regional level, only Shanghai had a significant difference in inefficiency. In summary, although Taiwan is one of the top two of these four regions in terms of the educational efficiency of mathematical literacy, it has the most educational inefficiency at the individual level and higher inefficiency differences at the individual and school levels between students with high and low overall efficiency. This indicates that Taiwan can still improve its educational efficiency.
期刊論文
1.Zhang, L.-C.、Sheu, T.-M.(2013)。Effective investment strategies on mathematics performance in rural areas。Quality & Quantity,47(5),2999-3017。  new window
2.Thanassoulis, E.(1999)。Setting Achievement Targets for School Children。Education Economics,7(2),101-119。  new window
3.Dawson, W.(2010)。Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia。Asia Pacific Education Review,11(1),14-24。  new window
4.Portela, M. C. A. S.、Thanassoulis, E.(2001)。Decomposing School and School-Type Efficiency。European Journal of Operational Research,132(2),357-373。  new window
5.劉潔玲(20090600)。香港中學生在國際學生評估計畫的閱讀表現對語文課程改革的啟示。教育科學研究期刊,54(2),85-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Sue, S.、Okazaki, S.(1990)。Asian American educational achievements: A phenomenon in search of an explanation。American Psychologist,45(8),913-920。  new window
7.Bessent, A.、Bessent, W.、Kennington, J.、Reagan, B.(1982)。An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District。Management Science,28(12),1355-1367。  new window
8.陳敏瑜、游錦雲(20130900)。以TIMSS資料檢視能力信念與任務價值對臺灣八年級學生數學成就之影響。教育科學研究期刊,58(3),153-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.White, K. R.(1982)。The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement。Psychological Bulletin,91(3),461-481。  new window
10.張立民(20110300)。Using PISA and TIMSS Mathematics Assessments to Identify the Relative Strengths of Students in Western and Asian Countries。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),67-89。new window  new window
11.Jesson, D.、Mayston, D.、Smith, P.(1987)。Performance assessment in the education sector: educational and economic perspectives。Oxford Review of Education,13(3),249-266。  new window
12.Thanassoulis, E.、Dunstan, P.(1994)。Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: an illustration with data from a local educational authority。Journal of the Operational Research Society,45(11),1247-1262。  new window
13.Liu, J.(2012)。Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan。International Journal of Educational Development,32(1),46-52。  new window
14.Mayston, D.、Jesson, D.(1988)。Developing models of educational accountability。Oxford Review of Education,14(3),321-339。  new window
15.Mancebón, M.-J.、Calero, J.、Choi, Á.、Ximénez-de-Embún, D. P.(2012)。The Efficiency of Public and Publicly Subsidized High Schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006。Journal of the Operational Research Society,63(11),1516-1533。  new window
16.Afonso, A.、St. Aubyn, M.(2006)。Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs。Economic Modelling,23(3),476-491。  new window
17.Stevenson, David Lee、Baker, David P.(1992)。Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan。American Journal of Sociology,97(6),1639-1657。  new window
18.陳嘉成、陳柏霖、洪兆祥、薛人華(20180900)。劍的雙面刃--國中數學科不同成就學生學習組型差異之分析。教育科學研究期刊,63(3),105-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.彭開琼、張佳雯、李瑞生(20171200)。OECD國家與臺灣之教育績效比較:以PISA科學素養為例。教育科學研究期刊,62(4),145-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Agasisti, T.(2011)。How competition affects schools' performances: Does specification matter?。Economics Letters,110(3),259-261。  new window
21.Agasisti, T.(2014)。The efficiency of public spending on education: An empirical comparison of EU countries。European Journal of Education,49(4),543-557。  new window
22.Berger, M. C.、Toma, E. F.(1994)。Variation in state education policies and effects on student performance。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,13(3),477-491。  new window
23.Crespo-Cebada, E.、Pedraja-Chaparro, F.、Santín, D.(2014)。Does school ownership matter? An unbiased efficiency comparison for regions of Spain。Journal of Productivity Analysis,41(1),153-172。  new window
24.Deutsch, J.、Dumas, A.、Silber, J.(2013)。Estimating an educational production function for five countries of Latin America on the basis of the PISA data。Economics of Education Review,36,245-262。  new window
25.Giménez, V.、Prior, D.、Thieme, C.(2007)。Technical efficiency, managerial efficiency and objective-setting in the educational system: An international comparison。Journal of the Operational Research Society,58(8),996-1007。  new window
26.Hanushek, E. A.、Taylor, L. L.(1990)。Alternative assessments of the performance of schools: Measurement of state variations in achievement。The Journal of Human Resources,25(2),179-201。  new window
27.Jen, Tsung-hau、Lee, Che-di、Chien, Chin-lung、Hsu, Ying-shao、Chen, Kuan-ming(20130600)。Perceived Social Relationships and Science Learning Outcomes for Taiwanese Eighth Graders: Structural Equation Modeling with a Complex Sampling Consideration。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,11(3),575-600。  new window
28.Thieme, C.、Giménez, V.、Prior, D.(2012)。A comparative analysis of the efficiency of national education systems。Asia Pacific Education Review,13(1),1-15。  new window
29.Zhou, Y.、Wang, D.(2015)。The family socioeconomic effect on extra lessons in Greater China: A comparison between Shanghai, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao。The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,24(2),363-377。  new window
30.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
31.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
32.任宗浩、譚克平、張立民(20110300)。二階段分層叢集抽樣的設計效應估計:以TIMSS 2007調查研究為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),33-65。  延伸查詢new window
33.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
34.張良丞、許添明、吳新傑(20160900)。國民中學適足教育經費:臺灣偏遠與非偏遠地區學校的比較。教育科學研究期刊,61(3),43-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Schümer, G.(1999)。Mathematics education in Japan。Journal of Curriculum Studies,31(4),399-427。  new window
研究報告
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2014)。PISA 2012 technical report。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
2.Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(2017)。PISA 2015 technical report。Pairs:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
圖書
1.Bogetoft, P.、Otto, L.(2011)。Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
2.臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2015)。臺灣PISA 2012結果報告。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Banker, R. D.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Swarts, J.、Thomas, A.(1989)。An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses。Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting。Bingley:Emerald。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE