資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.78.155)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
華人地區數學素養教育效率比較
書刊名:
教育科學研究期刊
作者:
鄭永福
/
許瑛玿
/
李哲迪
作者(外文):
Cheng, Yung-fu
/
Hsu, Ying-shao
/
Lee, Che-di
出版日期:
2018
卷期:
63:4
頁次:
頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:
效率分解
;
教育效率
;
資料包絡分析
;
數學素養
;
國際學生能力評量計畫
;
Data envelopment analysis
;
Decomposition of efficiency
;
Educational efficiency
;
Mathematical literacy
;
PISA
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
39
點閱:4
本研究利用國際學生能力評量計畫2012年資料比較臺灣(只包括人口數大於100萬的七個大城市)、上海、香港與新加坡等四個華人地區的數學素養教育效率,並從教育效率的角度探討這四個地區數學教育的公平性。資料包絡分析法及效率分解法之分析結果顯示,臺灣與上海的「綜合效率」(含地區、學校與個人教育效率)、「地區與學校效率」與「地區系統效率」都是最高。然而,歸因於個人之無效率以臺灣與上海最高,歸因於學校之無效率在四個地區無顯著差異,歸因於地區之無效率以香港最高。在四個地區教育公平性方面,在高與低綜合教育效率學生之間,個人、學校與地區三個層級的無效率存在差異。具體而言,在個人層級,臺灣的無效率差異最大、上海次之;在學校層級,新加坡的無效率差異最大、臺灣次之;在地區層級,僅上海存在差異。總結而言,臺灣雖是數學素養教育效率最佳的兩個地區之一,然而,歸因於個人之無效率仍有相對較高的數值,且個人與學校之無效率也存在高與低教育效率學生之間差異過大的問題。此結果顯示,臺灣在個人和學校層級的教育效率仍有改進的空間。
以文找文
This study uses data from the Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 to compare the educational efficiency of mathematical literacy and explore the educational equality of mathematics with educational efficiency across four ethnically Chinese regions, including Taiwan (containing seven cities with a population greater than 1 million), Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Data envelopment analysis and decomposition of efficiency revealed that Taiwan and Shanghai have the highest overall efficiency (the total of the regional, school, and individual levels), regional plus school efficiency (the total of the regional and school levels), and regional system efficiency. However, Taiwan and Shanghai have the most inefficiency at the individual level, and Hong Kong has the most inefficiency at the regional level. At the school level, there was no significant difference in terms of inefficiency among the four regions. Regarding educational equality among the four regions, there were significant differences in educational inefficiency at the individual, school, and regional levels between students with high and low overall educational efficiency. Specifically, at the individual level, Taiwan had the largest inefficiency difference between students with high and low overall efficiency, followed by Shanghai. At the school level, Singapore had the largest inefficiency difference, followed by Taiwan. At the regional level, only Shanghai had a significant difference in inefficiency. In summary, although Taiwan is one of the top two of these four regions in terms of the educational efficiency of mathematical literacy, it has the most educational inefficiency at the individual level and higher inefficiency differences at the individual and school levels between students with high and low overall efficiency. This indicates that Taiwan can still improve its educational efficiency.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Zhang, L.-C.、Sheu, T.-M.(2013)。Effective investment strategies on mathematics performance in rural areas。Quality & Quantity,47(5),2999-3017。
2.
Thanassoulis, E.(1999)。Setting Achievement Targets for School Children。Education Economics,7(2),101-119。
3.
Dawson, W.(2010)。Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia。Asia Pacific Education Review,11(1),14-24。
4.
Portela, M. C. A. S.、Thanassoulis, E.(2001)。Decomposing School and School-Type Efficiency。European Journal of Operational Research,132(2),357-373。
5.
劉潔玲(20090600)。香港中學生在國際學生評估計畫的閱讀表現對語文課程改革的啟示。教育科學研究期刊,54(2),85-105。
延伸查詢
6.
Sue, S.、Okazaki, S.(1990)。Asian American educational achievements: A phenomenon in search of an explanation。American Psychologist,45(8),913-920。
7.
Bessent, A.、Bessent, W.、Kennington, J.、Reagan, B.(1982)。An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District。Management Science,28(12),1355-1367。
8.
陳敏瑜、游錦雲(20130900)。以TIMSS資料檢視能力信念與任務價值對臺灣八年級學生數學成就之影響。教育科學研究期刊,58(3),153-186。
延伸查詢
9.
White, K. R.(1982)。The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement。Psychological Bulletin,91(3),461-481。
10.
張立民(20110300)。Using PISA and TIMSS Mathematics Assessments to Identify the Relative Strengths of Students in Western and Asian Countries。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),67-89。
11.
Jesson, D.、Mayston, D.、Smith, P.(1987)。Performance assessment in the education sector: educational and economic perspectives。Oxford Review of Education,13(3),249-266。
12.
Thanassoulis, E.、Dunstan, P.(1994)。Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: an illustration with data from a local educational authority。Journal of the Operational Research Society,45(11),1247-1262。
13.
Liu, J.(2012)。Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan。International Journal of Educational Development,32(1),46-52。
14.
Mayston, D.、Jesson, D.(1988)。Developing models of educational accountability。Oxford Review of Education,14(3),321-339。
15.
Mancebón, M.-J.、Calero, J.、Choi, Á.、Ximénez-de-Embún, D. P.(2012)。The Efficiency of Public and Publicly Subsidized High Schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006。Journal of the Operational Research Society,63(11),1516-1533。
16.
Afonso, A.、St. Aubyn, M.(2006)。Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs。Economic Modelling,23(3),476-491。
17.
Stevenson, David Lee、Baker, David P.(1992)。Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan。American Journal of Sociology,97(6),1639-1657。
18.
陳嘉成、陳柏霖、洪兆祥、薛人華(20180900)。劍的雙面刃--國中數學科不同成就學生學習組型差異之分析。教育科學研究期刊,63(3),105-130。
延伸查詢
19.
彭開琼、張佳雯、李瑞生(20171200)。OECD國家與臺灣之教育績效比較:以PISA科學素養為例。教育科學研究期刊,62(4),145-179。
延伸查詢
20.
Agasisti, T.(2011)。How competition affects schools' performances: Does specification matter?。Economics Letters,110(3),259-261。
21.
Agasisti, T.(2014)。The efficiency of public spending on education: An empirical comparison of EU countries。European Journal of Education,49(4),543-557。
22.
Berger, M. C.、Toma, E. F.(1994)。Variation in state education policies and effects on student performance。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,13(3),477-491。
23.
Crespo-Cebada, E.、Pedraja-Chaparro, F.、Santín, D.(2014)。Does school ownership matter? An unbiased efficiency comparison for regions of Spain。Journal of Productivity Analysis,41(1),153-172。
24.
Deutsch, J.、Dumas, A.、Silber, J.(2013)。Estimating an educational production function for five countries of Latin America on the basis of the PISA data。Economics of Education Review,36,245-262。
25.
Giménez, V.、Prior, D.、Thieme, C.(2007)。Technical efficiency, managerial efficiency and objective-setting in the educational system: An international comparison。Journal of the Operational Research Society,58(8),996-1007。
26.
Hanushek, E. A.、Taylor, L. L.(1990)。Alternative assessments of the performance of schools: Measurement of state variations in achievement。The Journal of Human Resources,25(2),179-201。
27.
Jen, Tsung-hau、Lee, Che-di、Chien, Chin-lung、Hsu, Ying-shao、Chen, Kuan-ming(20130600)。Perceived Social Relationships and Science Learning Outcomes for Taiwanese Eighth Graders: Structural Equation Modeling with a Complex Sampling Consideration。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,11(3),575-600。
28.
Thieme, C.、Giménez, V.、Prior, D.(2012)。A comparative analysis of the efficiency of national education systems。Asia Pacific Education Review,13(1),1-15。
29.
Zhou, Y.、Wang, D.(2015)。The family socioeconomic effect on extra lessons in Greater China: A comparison between Shanghai, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao。The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,24(2),363-377。
30.
Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。
31.
Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。
32.
任宗浩、譚克平、張立民(20110300)。二階段分層叢集抽樣的設計效應估計:以TIMSS 2007調查研究為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),33-65。
延伸查詢
33.
Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。
34.
張良丞、許添明、吳新傑(20160900)。國民中學適足教育經費:臺灣偏遠與非偏遠地區學校的比較。教育科學研究期刊,61(3),43-67。
延伸查詢
35.
Schümer, G.(1999)。Mathematics education in Japan。Journal of Curriculum Studies,31(4),399-427。
研究報告
1.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2014)。PISA 2012 technical report。Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。
2.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(2017)。PISA 2015 technical report。Pairs:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。
圖書
1.
Bogetoft, P.、Otto, L.(2011)。Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R。New York, NY:Springer。
2.
臺灣PISA國家研究中心(2015)。臺灣PISA 2012結果報告。臺北:心理。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
Banker, R. D.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Swarts, J.、Thomas, A.(1989)。An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses。Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting。Bingley:Emerald。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
愛在流轉:某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效
2.
東亞國家閱讀素養教育效率比較--以PISA 2018為例
3.
中等學校體育師資生「師資培育學程選擇動機量表」之修訂與信效度檢驗
4.
在PISA閱讀素養框架下比較不同教學年資教師自評文言篇章教學策略:以香港中學為例
5.
臺灣閱讀教育治理之城鄉差異探究
6.
從學校氛圍視角分析華人學生PISA 2018閱讀素養的表現
7.
國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析
8.
臺灣教育的城鄉差距:偏鄉學校實徵研究的分析
9.
成功期望與興趣價值對數學成就的動態影響:動態結構方程模型分析
10.
學習興趣和自信對中年級學生數學成就成長率的影響
11.
自我效能與學業成就的相關性之後設分析:資優學生與一般學生比較
12.
運用MSE模式於國中數學補救教學之合作式行動研究
13.
經濟弱勢青少年的家庭危險因子、家庭凝聚力、自尊與學業表現之關係
14.
幼兒認知發展階層化現象的影響機制:遊戲、閱讀與課室專注力的作用
15.
臺灣學生使用自我調整學習策略之現況分析:以雲林縣某國中為例
1.
影響臺灣八年級學生數學學習成就因素 之多層次模型分析
2.
修辭批評運用於文本閱讀之研究 ──以屏東縣國中語文普測結果為探索起點
3.
學生知覺教師期望、能力信念、實用價值與內在價值對臺灣八年級學生數理成就之影響:以TIMSS 2011多層次結構方程式模型為例
4.
家庭作業與學習成就關係之研究—以TIMSS與TEPS臺灣學生為例
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code