Taiwan Legislative Yuan in 2017 passed the Act to implement the "real name system" for the cram schools. However in our opinion, the "real name system" is only a passive policy, and "teaching license system" is the right way. The purpose of this study is to explore the difficulties and feasibility of the implementation of the teaching license system for the cram schools. Investigating the views of cram school managers with CATI was employed in this research. The conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) Cram school teaching license system is feasible. (2) It is advisable for the cram school teacher license system to be planned by MOE, handled by the local authorities, and implemented by the associations. (3) The cram school teaching license system should adopt a grading system, and it needs more than three years of "sunset legislation" period. (4) The cram school teaching license system should have a renewal system and the ways to regulate violations of professional ethics. (5) The biggest impact of cram school teaching license system is that "hard to find qualified teachers in remote areas," and the biggest positive influence is "parents feel more at ease when their children in the cram schools."