:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高夫曼戲劇理論下之社區活動參與--以臺中市舊正社區太極拳班為例
書刊名:臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊
作者:林裕峰廖淑娟 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Yu FengLiao, Shuchuan
出版日期:2019
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:高夫曼戲劇理論社區參與面對面互動自我表演太極拳班Goffman's dramaturgical theoryCommunity participationFace-to-face interactionPresentation of selfTai Chi team
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1278
  • 點閱點閱:16
本研究從高夫曼之戲劇理論觀點,以臺中市霧峰區舊正社區太極拳班為對象,藉由參與觀察、關係建立、與深度訪談之過程而完成。有關人在生活場域裡的各種自我表現,舉凡社會的禮儀規範,或人們互動的行為種種,皆可視為表演,亦即戲劇的演出。在研究過程中,浮現了高夫曼的戲劇理論中的角色相關的聯想,因而聯結至華人戲曲的角色臉譜,生、旦、淨、末、丑,臉譜背後恰有對其角色特質之解讀,並在戲劇裡論的基礎與概念下,詮釋各角色於班隊活動進行及互動時之行為表現並加以分析,忠實呈現在戲劇架構下的社區參與與日常表現。本研究之分析依循表演的起承轉合,從班隊的起源探討、進而了解成員在表演進行中面對面互動的做為,最終以落幕對應成員面臨危機時的處理,形塑出完整的戲劇。在戲劇縮影下的成員,本本分分地演出自己,並非刻意為演而演,也正因如此,過程中透露出的訊息才能真實地刻劃在各自對應的角色上,不需做表演印象上的修飾或形象的維持。最後,研究者在班隊成員所擁有之強烈參與動機中,看見太極拳班永續長存的可能性。成員雖各自扮演不同的角色,卻對班隊有著強烈的認同,有默契地透過自己的方式服務大家,維繫並營造溫暖之氛圍,讓人窺見了社區中獨有的團結與和諧。
Adopting Goffman's dramaturgical theory, this study conducted participant observation and in-depth interview methods on and established relationship with the participants in a Tai Chi team of the Chiou-Cheng Community in Wufeng District, Taichung City, Taiwan. Individuals' presentation of self in everyday life, including social etiquettes and norms and interpersonal interactions, can all be considered a type of performance, namely theatrical performance. This study associated role-related ideas in Goffman's dramaturgical theory with the roles in Chinese Opera (i.e., Sheng, Dan, Jing, Mo, and Chou), each of which corresponds to a specific role characteristic. Using concepts of dramaturgical theory as the basis, this study interpreted and analyzed the behavioral performance of the roles during team activities and their interactions to faithfully demonstrate the community participation and daily performance under a theatrical structure. The analysis process accorded with the plot of the performance. We explored the beginning of the team and the face-to-face interactions of the participants during the performance. Then, in a closing scene, the participants' contingent approach in the face of crises completed the drama. The participants acted themselves faithfully, rather than purposefully. Therefore, the messages revealed during the performance were genuinely reflected on the participants' corresponding roles without image modification or maintenance for the performance. Finally, the researchers identified the possibility of continual maintenance of the Tai Chi team because of the strong participation motivation of the participants. Although the participants played different roles, they share a strong identity to the Tai Chi team. They tacitly provided individual services to the team, created and maintained warm atmospheres, and showed unique unification and harmony of the community.
期刊論文
1.王湘雯(20080900)。由高夫曼的戲劇理論探討劇場中前臺經理的工作表演。臺藝戲劇學刊,4,1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Pearce, C.、Arnold, M.、Phillips, C.、Trumble, S.、Dwan, K.(2011)。The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation。Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,18,138-142。  new window
3.Cherry, J.、Calvert, P.(2012)。Library service as theatre: Using dramaturgy to investigate attitudes to the retail and professional models of service[Abstract]。Aslib Proceedings,64(2),201-214。  new window
4.楊政樺、張新立(20050600)。以關鍵事件技術及劇場理論探討航空公司服務遞送滿意之研究--以臺港航線為例。運輸計劃,34(2),261-291。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.潘淑滿、蔡青墉、楊榮宗(20000300)。評估「社區總體營造」在現階段推行社區發展工作之成效:都市社區落實草根民主的可能途徑。社會工作學刊,6,86_1+87-122。  延伸查詢new window
6.甯應斌(20040900)。再論性工作與現代性:高夫曼式的詮釋分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,55,141-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳明和、郭靜芳(20040300)。符號互動論與學校組織文化。屏東師院學報,20,65-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.謝政勳(20161200)。SWOT分析應用於社區發展經營策略之研究--以參與農村再生培根計畫之社區為例。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,6(3),1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bullingham, L.、Vasconcelos, A. C.(2013)。The presentation of self in the online world": Goffman and the study of online identities。Journal of Information Science,39(1),101-112。  new window
10.吳明儒(20160800)。社區育成中心的理念、歷程與展望--以大學社區睦鄰組織為本。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,6(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林家緯(20170400)。桌上遊戲運用在社區工作經驗分享:以「故事骰」為例。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,7(1),151-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林曉君(20150400)。論析社區工作者、社區成人教育者在社區發展脈絡下之工作角色。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,5(1),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.魏慧美、陳翊偉、吳和堂(20130600)。國小導師與家長互動方式之研究--Goffman的戲劇理論取向。高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類,34,57-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Lowe, S.、Purchase, S.、Ellis, N.(2012)。The Drama of Interaction within Business Networks。Industrial Marketing Management,41(3),421-428。  new window
15.Neale, J.、Nettleton, S.、Pickering, L.(2011)。Recovery from Problem Drug Use: What Can We Learn from the Sociologist Erving Goffman?。Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy,18(1),3-9。  new window
會議論文
1.李易駿(2017)。社區培力與社區參與的理念與現實,「公民手牽手,桃園福利向前走」桃園市政府社會局107年度參與式預算實施計畫--聯合社區旗艦方案。社區發展新視野--全球觀點與在地推展國際研討會,中華救助總會(主辦) (會議日期: 2017/08/29)。臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Miller, H.(1995)。The Presentation of Self in Electronic Life: Goffman on the internet。The Embodied Knowledge and Virtual Space Conference。Goldsmiths' College, University of London。  new window
圖書
1.丘昌泰(2001)。台北市社區參與制度之研究。台北:台北市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Scot, J.(2012)。Fifty key sociologists: The contemporary theorists。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
3.黃瑞琴(1999)。質性教育研究方法。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Goffman, Erving、徐江敏、李姚軍(1992)。日常生活中的自我表演。臺北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Wates, Nick、Knevitt, Charles(1987)。Community Architecture: How people are creating their own environment。London:Penguin Books。  new window
6.林清文(2006)。認識社區營造。臺北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
7.李易駿(2017)。當代社區工作:計畫與發展實務。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
8.高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Phillips, R.、Pittman, R. H.(2009)。An Introduction to Community Development。Routledge。  new window
其他
1.Vasileiou, P.(2014)。FACE TO FACEBOOK: The Construction of Identity in the Internet Era,http://filmiconjournal.com/blog/post/23/face-to-facebook。  new window
圖書論文
1.許殷宏(2006)。Erving Goffman:當代戲劇理論的思想巨擘。教育社會學:人物與思想。臺北:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭為元(1992)。日常生活戲劇觀的評論家:高夫曼。當代社會思想巨擘:當代社會思想家。臺北市:正中。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡文龍、林香生(1996)。社區工作價值和原則。社區工作:理論與實踐。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE