:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國的出生公民權:緣起與適用範圍
書刊名:人文與社會學報
作者:徐開基
作者(外文):Hsu, Kai-chi
出版日期:2019
卷期:3:8
頁次:頁129-149
主題關鍵詞:出生公民權美國訴黃金德(1898)史考特訴桑福德(1856)排華法案卡爾文案Birthright citizenshipUS v. Huang Kim Ark (1898)Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856)Chinese exclusion actCalvin's case
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
美國早年承襲英國的自然法傳統,只要在美國領土出生,就自動取得美國國籍,這就是出生公民權(birthright citizenship)。然而在以白人為主的社會下,美國的黑人與印地安人被排除在出生公民權之外。本文的主旨在呈現修憲加入出身公民權條款與其他曲折的過程,出生公民權的適用範圍逐漸擴大,包括了黑人、印地安人與華人。近年來,因經濟因素,美國社會保守意識提升,反移民的提議增多,承襲英國自然法的出生公民權也受到挑戰,然而考慮到社會穩定與美國傳統因素,以保守派大法官居多的最高法院目前不致於限縮出生公民權的適用範圍。
Those who were born in the territory of United State are American citizens (birthright citizenship). This is American legal tradition inherited from British Natural Law principle. However in White people dominating society, birthright citizenship did not include Black and Indians. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that through birthright citizenship clause of US Constitutional amendment the minorities (Black, Indians and Chinese) experienced difficult historical steps and finally were accepted as US citizens. These several years, due to economic down turn, conservative thought is prevalent; anti-immigration initiatives increase than before. One of them is to limit birthright citizenship which comes from natural law of Britain to only American and legal alien residents; undocumented (or illegal) alien residents are excluded. However, considering social stability and American tradition, the possibility to limit birthright citizenship target is low even conservative Justices are majority in the Supreme Court.
期刊論文
1.Price, Polly J.(1997)。Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin's Case (1608)。Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities,9(1)。  new window
2.Smith, Rogers(2009)。Birthright Citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 and 2008。Journal of Constitutional Law,11,1329-1335。  new window
圖書
1.Shachar, Ayelet(2009)。The birthright lottery: Citizenship and global inequality。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Schwartz, Bernard(1995)。A history of the Supreme Court。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.王希(2014)。原則與妥協:美國憲法的精神與實踐。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.任東來、陳偉、白雪峰(2014)。美國憲政歷程:影響美國的25個司法大案。北京:中國法制出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.邱彰(2012)。龍與鷹的搏鬥:美國華人法律史。臺北市:米樂文化國際有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.陶龍生(2017)。華人與美國法律:歷史性的法院判決。臺北市:聯合文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張純如、陳榮彬(20180000)。美國華人史:十九世紀至二十一世紀初,一百五十年華人史詩。遠足文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Qin, Yucheng(2009)。The Diplomacy of Nationalism: The Six Companies and China's Policy toward Exclusion。Honolulu, Hawaii:University of Hawai'i Press。  new window
9.Toobin, Jeffrey(2007)。The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court。New York, NY:Bantam Dell Pub Group。  new window
10.O'Brien, David M.(2005)。Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics。New York:W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Salyer, Lucy E.(2005)。Wong Kim Ark: The Contest Over Birthright Citizenship。Immigration Stories。New York:Foundation Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE