:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:質性解題策略教學提升學生解題能力的進展與困難--以國中力與運動單元為例
書刊名:師資培育與教師專業發展期刊
作者:李曉雯林建隆
作者(外文):Li, Hsiao-wenLin, Jang-long
出版日期:2019
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁125-152
主題關鍵詞:力與運動替未來學習做準備質性解題策略Force and motionPreparation for future learningQualitative problem-solving strategies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究旨在發展質性解題策略,並對台灣中部某所國中九年級學生進行質性解題策略教學,試著改變學生看待問題的方式,讓學生瞭解解題時質性分析的重要,進而提升解題能力。本研究的質性解題策略聚焦在學生使用公式解決問題前,能先用原理或概念來分析問題,並能具體說明原理與題目的關聯。在檢驗學生解題能力的進展,採用替未來學習做準備(Preparation for Future Learning, PFL)觀點,發展提供解題資源的測驗,觀察學生是否能善用課堂中所學習的質性解題策略,來幫助自己善用解題資源,進而能成功解決目標問題。解題能力的進展分三個部分來探討,第一、解題策略的使用;第二、解題策略缺陷的改善情形;第三、解題的成功率。研究結果發現,接受質性解題策略教學的參與者,在解題策略的使用、解題缺陷的改善、實際成功解題等三方面,教學前後有顯著的進步,與現行解題策略教學相較,質性解題策略教學的成效較佳。
The purposes of this study were to develop a qualitative problem-solving strategy and to examine the effect of using such a strategy to improve ninth-graders' problem-solving ability in physics. We targeted to enhance the way students approach problems by helping them realize the importance of qualitative analysis while solving problems. In particular, students were instructed to solve problems by analyzing the problems with principles or concepts and specifying the relationship between principles and problems before they applied formulas. To evaluate the effect of this strategy, the perspective of Preparation for Future Learning (PFL) was adopted. Students were provided with problem-solving resources in their tasks. The aim of the study was to explore whether students could make good use of the qualitative problem-solving strategies learned in the classroom, thereby raising their awareness of the problem-solving resources and successfully solving the target problems. Students' problem-solving ability was examined in three aspects: the use of problem-solving strategies, the reduction of problem-solving strategy defects, and the success rate of solving problems. Results indicated that the participants using a qualitative problem-solving strategy showed a significant improvement at learning progress and had better performances in comparison with a traditional problem-solving strategy.
期刊論文
1.Van Heuvelen, A.(1991)。Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies。American Journal of Physics,59(10),891-897。  new window
2.Reif, F.(1995)。Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes。American Journal of Physics,63(1),17-32。  new window
3.Hestenes, D.、Wells, W.、Swackhamer, G.(1992)。Force concept inventory。The Physics Teacher,30(3),141-158。  new window
4.Bransford, J. D.、Schwartz, D.(1999)。Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications。Review of Research in Education,24,61-100。  new window
5.Schwartz, Daniel L.、Martin, Taylor(2004)。Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction。Cognition and Instruction,22(2),129-184。  new window
6.Ding, L.、Reay, N.、Lee, A.、Bao, L.(2011)。Exploring the role of conceptual scaffolding in solving synthesis problems。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,7。  new window
7.Docktor, J. L.、Strand, N. E.、Mestre, J. P.、Ross, B. H.(2015)。Conceptual problem solving in high school physics。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,11。  new window
8.Hull, M.、Kuo, E.、Gupta, A.、Elby, A.(2013)。Problem-solving rubrics revisited: Attending to the blending of informal conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,9。  new window
9.Hegde, B.、Meera, B. N.(2012)。How do they solve it? An insight into the learner's approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,8。  new window
10.Kim, E.、Pak, S. J.(2002)。Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems。American Journal of Physics,70。  new window
11.Leonard, W.、Dufresne, R.、Mestre, J.(1996)。Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems。American Journal of Physics,64,1495-1502。  new window
12.Mualem, R.、Eylon, B. S.(2007)。"Physics with a smile"--explaining phenomena with a qualitative problem-solving strategy。The Physics Teacher,45。  new window
13.Mualem, R.、Eylon, B. S.(2010)。Junior high school physics: Using a qualitative strategy for successful problem solving。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(9),1094-1115。  new window
14.Mylopoulosl, M.、Woods, N.(2014)。Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction。Medical Education,48,667-673。  new window
15.Singh, C.(2008)。Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. performance on non-intuitive problem pair from introductory physics。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,4。  new window
16.Singh, C.(2008)。Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. II. Effect of some potential factors on problem solving and transfer。Physical Review Special Topics--Physics Education Research,4。  new window
17.Van Heuvelen, A.、Maloney, D. P.(1999)。Playing physics jeopardy。American Journal of Physics,67。  new window
18.Van Heuvelen, A.(1991)。Overview, Case Study Physics。American Journal of Physics,59,898-907。  new window
會議論文
1.Hu, D.、Von Korff, J.、Sanjay Rebello, N.(2013)。Assessing transfer of learning in problem solving from the perspective of preparation for future learning。Physics Education Research Conference 2013,(會議日期: July 17-18, 2013)。  new window
圖書
1.Polya, G.(1973)。How to solve it。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top