:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:籃球規則得利與不得利原則之探析
書刊名:大專體育
作者:伍銳威陳五洲 引用關係
作者(外文):Ng, Yui-waiChen, Wu-chou
出版日期:2019
卷期:149
頁次:頁9-17
主題關鍵詞:塔氏哲學進攻威脅性RSBQTower philosophyOffensive threat
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:2
為使比賽更具觀賞性,許多運動項目都進行規則的修訂。如排球與羽球將「得權得分制」改為「落地得分制」、桌球將球的直徑增大、籃球比賽縮短進攻時間等,都是為了使比賽更精彩、更能吸引觀眾。籃球比賽中的身體接觸極為頻繁,錙銖必較的執法,使比賽時而中斷精彩度大減;過於寬鬆的執法則讓比賽難以管理,甚至導致暴力事件,過與不及都對比賽造成影響。本文之目的在介紹籃球規則中得利/不得利原則,並透過相關文獻闡述其發展過程、精神涵義與執行重點。籃球裁判執法的「金科玉律」是比賽中「流暢」與「控管」的平衡,使比賽能公平、順利地完成。國際籃球總會技術委員會主席Fred Horgan說:「每一場籃球比賽都有數百個身體接觸,但只有數十個會被宣判為犯規」。從塔氏哲學、進攻威脅性發展到節奏(rhythm)、速度(speed)、平衡(balance)和敏捷(quickness)(簡稱RSBQ),得利/不得利均基於一個原則:身體接觸不一定是犯規,當造成接觸的球員因而「得利」,或被接觸的球員處於「不利」時,這就是犯規。本文結語如下:運動競賽已發展成一種「表演」,其焦點是球員的技術和運動能力的展現,裁判應盡力保持比賽的流暢性,良好的運用得利/不得利原則,使比賽能在公平、順利的情況下完成。
Many sports have revised their rules in order to make competitive matches more exciting and attractive to spectators. Examples include volleyball and badminton discontinuing "side-out scoring" in favor of "rally scoring;" table tennis increasing the diameter of the ball; and basketball shortening the shot clock time. The extreme frequency of physical contact in basketball games raises similar issues. Strict enforcement of rules against such contact might interrupt the game too frequently; however, loose officiating might make the game difficult to manage, or even lead to conflicts. Choosing either approach would have a distinctive impact on the game. The purpose of this article is to introduce the principle of advantage/disadvantage in basketball rules, and to explain its development process, spirit and intent and implementation priorities through relevant literature. The "golden rule" of basketball officiating is the need to find a balance between "game flow" and "game control," so that the game can be completed fairly and smoothly. Horgan, chairman of the Technical Committee of International Basketball Federation, has stated: every basketball game has hundreds of instances of physical contact, but only a few dozen of those will be called a foul. From the development of the Tower Philosophy, offensive threat to rhythm, speed, balance, quickness (RSBQ), the standard of advantage/disadvantage is based on the principle that physical contact should not necessarily always be considered a foul. Rather, a foul should be called when a player who makes contact obtains an "advantage" or a player being contacted is placed in "disadvantage." The conclusion of this article is as follows: competitive sports have developed into a kind of "performance" that emphasizes the players' skills and athletic ability. The referee should try to maintain the smoothness of the game and use the principle of advantage/disadvantage. This will permit the game to be completed fairly and smoothly.
期刊論文
1.陳順義、李鴻棋(20060600)。談焦點判罰對籃球比賽的影響。大專體育,84,152-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.邱憲祥(20070300)。新修訂羽球規則對羽球運動的影響分析。中華體育季刊,21(1)=80,115-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王陽春(2005)。論規則的修改與體操的觀賞性價值。西北師範大學學報,41(3),93-95。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏海波、王婷婷(2009)。2008、2010年FIBA規則修訂對籃球運動的影響。體育學刊,16(6),91-93。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳俊心(2002)。新賽制對乒乓球技、戰術的影響及對策。山西廣播電視大學學報,2002(2),46-47。  延伸查詢new window
6.李達勝(20150700)。桌球器材演進及規則改革的影響與對策。中原體育學報,6,41-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李騰達、涂相金(2009)。籃球規則的修改對籃球運動發展的影響。江西教育學院學報,30(6),35-37。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳膺成、曾銀助、林忠程(20161200)。近代籃球規則演變之精神與意涵。大專體育,139,10-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.曾慧青(2018)。大型國際運動賽會行銷活動之探討--以2017臺北世大運為例。全球運動與休閒管理期刊,1(1),1-12。  延伸查詢new window
10.葉錦樹、程紹同(20150300)。全球行銷新典範--以跨國型企業贊助世界級運動賽會為例。運動與遊憩研究,9(3),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Horgan, F.(2004)。Contact: The principle of "offensive threat"。FIBA Assist Magazine,11,43-44。  new window
12.Horgan, F.(2010)。Consistency and credibility。FIBA Assist Magazine,43,32-34。  new window
13.Loube, P.(2004)。Tower philosophy: Advantages and disadvantages。FIBA Assist Magazine,9,40-43。  new window
圖書
1.中華民國籃球協會(1999)。1998-2002國際籃球規則。臺北市:中華民國籃球協會。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國籃球協會(2017)。2017國際籃球規則。臺北市:中華民國籃球協會。  延伸查詢new window
3.中華全國籃球委員會(1969)。最新國際籃球規則1968-1972。臺北市:中華全國籃球委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.International Basketball Federation(1980)。Official basketball rules 1980-1984。Munich:International Basketball Federation。  new window
5.National Basketball Association(2005)。Official NBA rules book 2005-06。New York, NY:National Basketball Association。  new window
6.Ströher, M.(2001)。Basketball: The rules: 1931-2000. Including the very first playing rules from 1891。Munich:International Basketball Federation。  new window
7.Zimbalist, A.(2015)。Circus maximus: The economic gamble behind hosting the Olympics and the World Cup。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution。  new window
單篇論文
1.International Basketball Federation(2016)。FRIP level 1: Home study book: Refereeing knowledge,http://www.basketref.com/documents/fiba_materials_2018/New_2017_FRIP%20L1_Home_Study_Book_4_Refereeing_v1.0.pdf。  new window
其他
1.International Basketball Federation(2016)。Contacts: Advantage/disadvantage,http://uksgo.hr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/DOSU%C4%90IVANJE-NE-SPORTSKE-PORE%C5%A0KETE-PROSU%C4%90IVANJE-PREDNOSTI-ILINE-PREDNOSTI-RSBQ.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.王仁堂、王瑞瑾、饒蘭君、逢廣華(2003)。籃球比賽時有關利益原則與裁判執法尺度之探討。大專體育學術專刊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kennedy, T. D.(2007)。To hack or not to hack? (The big) aristotle, excellence, and moral decision-making。Basketball and philosophy: Thinking outside the paint。Lexington, KY:University Press of Kentucky。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE