:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中學生遺傳學習的現況及問題
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:黃臺珠
出版日期:1993
卷期:4
頁次:頁214-183
主題關鍵詞:中學生學習遺傳
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
     分析國、高中生物教材,列出有關孟德爾遺傳法則有關的內容,並整理成「學生 學習孟德爾遺傳法則所需的概念及法則」,並以此為依據參閱國、高中教材,製作紙筆測驗 卷及面談工具。本篇以紙筆測驗工具的發展及測試結果為主。 該紙筆測驗卷經試測後,其信度經 Test-Retest 測定為 95,其內容效度係經雙向細目分析 。 紙筆測驗採 Modified random sampling 法,在高雄市取樣,包括:國中一年級 604 位 學生;高中一年級 401 位學生;高中三年級 223 位學生進行測試。 由紙筆測驗結果顯示: 一、各不同級(高三、高一、國一)學生在遺傳相關概念的學習成就上有顯著的差異,高三 學生優於高一學生,高高中學生優於國中學生。特別是涉及遺傳問題的演算上,高三優於高 一甚多。 二、高三學生在各相關概念的學習成就上各校間無顯著差異,而高一學生及國一學生在各不 同學校間有顯著差異存在。 三、在減數分裂時染色體的移動,配子形成時對偶基因與染色體間的關係,以及涉及顯隱律 、分離律、自由配合律等計算問題上,高一學生及國中學生較感困難。 四、面對二對基因控制兩組遺傳性狀的計算問題時,高中學生主要採用配子型及代數型二類 解題策略。分析此二不同解題策略的學生其遺傳相關概念的學習成就情況,發現高三學生無 顯著差異;而高一學生採用配子型解題策略的其學習成就優於採用代數型解題策略的。經進 一步分析發現其主要差異存於「基因染色體學說」及「自由配合律」二概念上。
     Lists the content related to basic Mendelian Genetics from junior high and senior high biology textbooks. Analyzes them into the "Table of the Required Concepts and Principles for Learning Basic Mendelian Genetics." According to this table, there are two designed instruments: the paper-pencil instrument and the interview instrument. This paper reports the results of the paper-pencil instrument. This instrument has been pilot studied and reliability according to test-retest is 95. The validity is according to two-dimensional analysis. The subjects for this study were selected by the modified random sampling method from public schools of the Kaohsiung area. There were twelve classes of seventh graders from six junior high schools. There were eight classes of tenth graders and five classes of twelfth graders from four senior high schools. The findings are listed below 1. There were significant differences between the genetics achievement scores of twelfth, tenth, and seventh graders. Twelfth graders scored better than tenth graders. Senior highers as a group scored better than junior highers. Especially for questions involving calculation, twelfth graders scored much better than tenth graders. 2. The scores of twelfth graders from different schools showed no significant difference. However, there were significant differences for tenth graders and for seventh graders from different schools. 3. On questions related to the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, the relationship between alleles and chromosomes during gamete formation, and to calculations involving the Law of Independent Dominance, the Law of Segregation, and the Law of Independent Assortment, seventh and tenth graders had difficulty. 4. When senior high students were asked to solve calculation problems related to dihybrids, they usually used either the gametes method or the algebra method as solving strategies. Analysis of scores found no significant difference between these two strategies when used by twelfth graders. But for tenth graders, those using the gamete method had significantly better scores than those using the algebra method. Advanced analysis showed that questions related to the concepts of "genes are located on chromosomes" and "the Law of Independent Assortment" accounted for the differences in scores.
期刊論文
1.Slack, Susie、Stewart, Jim(1989)。Improving student problem solving in genetics。Journal of Biological Education,23(4),308-312。  new window
2.黃臺珠(19901000)。中學生遺傳相關概念錯誤類型的探討。科學教育,133,34-53。  延伸查詢new window
3.Longden, Bernard(1982)。Genetics: Are There Inherent Learning Difficulties?。Journal of Biological Education,16(2),135-140。  new window
4.Radford, A.、Bird-Stewart, J. A.(1982)。Teaching Genetics in Schools。Journal of Biological Education,16(3),177-180。  new window
5.Stewart, James H.(1982)。Difficulties Experienced by High School Students When Learning Basic Mendelian Genetics。American Biology Teacher,44(2),80-82+84+89。  new window
6.Stewart, Jim、Dale, Michael(1989)。High school students' understanding of chromosome/gene behavior during meiosis。Science Education,73(4),501-521。  new window
7.Stewart, J.、Dale, M.(1981)。Solutions to genetics problems: Are they the same as correct answers?。The Austrian Science Teachers Journal,27(3),59-64。  new window
8.Sigismondi, Linda A.(1989)。A Paper Model of DNA Structure and Replication。American Biology Teacher,51(7),422-423。  new window
9.Stewart, J. B.(1987)。Genetics in relation to biology。School Science Review,68(245),645-653。  new window
10.Thomoson, Norman、Stewart, James(1985)。Secondary School Genetics Instruction: Making Problem Solving Explicit and Meaningful。Journal of Biological Education,19(1),53-62。  new window
11.Finely, F. N.、Stewart, J.、Yarroch, W.(1982)。Teachers Perceptions of difficult and important science content for student to learn。Science Education,66(4),531-538。  new window
12.Hackling, N. W.、Treagust, D.(1984)。Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,21(2),197-209。  new window
13.Deadman, J. A.、Kelly, P. J.(1978)。What Do Secondary School Boys Understand About Evolution and Heredity Before They are Taught the Topics?。Journal of Biological Education,12(1),7-15。  new window
14.Walker, Richard A.、Mertens, T. R.、Hendrix, J. R.(1979)。Formal Operational Reasoning Patterns and Scholastic Achievement in Genetics。Journal of College Science Teaching,8(3),156-160。  new window
15.Pearson, J. T.、Hughes, W. J.(1986)。Designing an A-Level Genetics Course: II Sequencing the Material and Developing a Strategy for Teaching and Assessment。Journal of Biological Education,20(2),133-137。  new window
16.Pearson, J. T.、Hughes, W. J.(1986)。Designing an A-Level Genetics Course: I, Identifying the Necessary Concepts and Considering Their Relationships。Journal of Biological Education,20(1),47-55。  new window
17.Kargbo, D. B.、Hobbs, D.、Erickson, G. L.(1980)。Children's beliefs about inherited characteristics。Journal of Biological Education,14(2),137-146。  new window
18.Pearson, J. T.、Hughes, W. J.(1988)。Problems with the Use of Terminology in Genetics Education: 1, A Literature Review and Classification Scheme。Journal of Biological Education,22(3),178-182。  new window
19.Slesnick, Irwin L.、Parakh, Jal S.(1988)。Difficult Decisions: Genetic Screening。Science Teacher,55(4),28-29。  new window
20.鄭湧涇(19810400)。國中女生生物科學習成就與認知發展的關係。科學發展月刊,9(4),365-376。  延伸查詢new window
21.鄭湧涇(19820600)。皮亞傑認知發展與生物科學習的關係。科學教育,51,23-27。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Huang, I.(1983)。An Identificaion of Life Science Concepts in Selected Elementary and Secondary School Biology Textbooks in the Republic of China。First Asia-pacific Conference on Scinece Education。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
學位論文
1.楊坤原(1989)。中學生認知能力與遺傳學概念學習之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Emery, J.(1973)。The Status of Certain Probability Concepts and Combinatorial Abilities of High School Biology Students and the Effect of Genetics Instruction on These Cognitive Characteristics(博士論文)。Florida State University.。  new window
3.Hachling, N. W.(1981)。Secondary Students' Understanding of Inheritance Concepts and Propositions(碩士論文)。Western Australian Institute of Technology,Perth, WA。  new window
4.Huang, I.(1987)。Student Comprehension and Teacher Perception of Tenth Grade Biology Concept Learning in te Republic of China(博士論文)。Indiana State University,Terre Haute, IN。  new window
圖書
1.國立編譯館(1987)。國民小學自然科學課本。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立編譯館(1987)。國民中學生物課本。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.國立編譯館(1987)。高級中學基礎生物課本。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.國立編譯館(1987)。高級中學生物課本。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top