:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學學生人格傾向、同儕楷模與攻擊性行為關係之研究
書刊名:高雄師大學報
作者:郭隆興 引用關係
出版日期:1994
卷期:5
頁次:頁242-222
主題關鍵詞:人格傾向同儕楷模攻擊性行為國民小學學生
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:29
     本研究旨在探討國小學生背景變項、人格內外控傾向、同儕楷 模攻擊性程度與攻擊性行為之關係,研究目的如下; 一、瞭解不同的背景獎項、人格傾向、同儕楷模攻擊性程度之國小學生 攻擊性行為之差異。 二、探討國民小學學生背景變項、人格傾向、同儕楷模攻擊性程度與攻 擊性行為間之關係。 三、分析國小學生的性別、年級、出生序、家庭社經地位、人格傾向、 同儕楷模攻擊性程度其攻擊性行為的預測功能。根據文獻與理論研究、 研究結果與討論,本研究可歸納如下的結論: 一、男生的攻擊性行為皆大於女生。 二、國小學生的言語攻擊性行為大於身體攻擊性行為。 三、不同社經地位者在攻擊性行為上無顯著差異。 四、外控人格傾向者的攻擊性行為上皆大於內控人格傾向者。 五、高同儕楷模攻擊性程度者的攻擊性行為皆大於其他同儕楷模攻擊性 程度者,低同儕楷模攻擊性程度者的攻擊性行為最小。 六、背景變項、人格傾向和同儕楷模攻擊性程度對國小學生攻擊性行為 兩兩均無交互作用存在。 七、部分背景變項、人格傾向、同儕楷模對國小學生攻擊性行為有預測作用。
     This study was designed to investigate the relationship of sex,birth-order, family socioeconomic status, personality , peer model &aggressive behavior for the 6th grade students. Results and implications are discussed in the context of currentresearch, theory, and findings, then, the conclusions for this studyconsisted the followings: (a) The boys are much aggressive than the girls. (b) The students' verbal aggressive behavior is grater than physical aggressive behavior. (c) There is no significant difference in the aggressive behavior among students of varied family-socioeconomic-status. (d) The external-controled students are much aggressive than other locus-of-control ones. (e) The high score group of peer-model aggression is much aggressive than other groups. (f) There is no interaction of independent variables , personality, peer model for aggressive behavior. (g) Sex, birth-order, personality, & peer model were proved to be powerful predictors of aggressive behavior. Finally, with the view of independent variables, personality &peer-model aggression, my recommendations for school education, familyeducation, students, and future research were offered.
期刊論文
1.Nowicki, S. Jr.、Strickland, B. R.(1973)。A locus of control scale for children。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,40(1),148-154。  new window
2.吳武典(19770600)。制握信念與學業成就、自我觀念、社會互動之關係及其改變技術。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,19,163-178。  延伸查詢new window
3.Perry, D. G.、Perry, L. C.、Weiss, R. J.(1989)。Sex differences in the consequences that children anticipate for aggression。Developmental Psychology,25(2),312-319。  new window
4.李美枝(1984)。高低攻擊傾向之國小、國中男學生在觀看電視習性、父母教養方式、友伴中地位及學業成就上之比較研究。教育與心理研究,7,19-42。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃堅厚(1980)。釋認同。測驗與輔導,39,609-610。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇薌雨(19630300)。「挫折與攻擊」假說之批判。國立臺灣大學理學院心理學系研究報告,5,19-26。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cairns, R. B.、Cairns, B. D.、Neckerman, H. J.、Ferguson, L. L.、Gariepy, J.(1989)。Growth and Aggression: Childhood to Early Adolescence。Developmental Psychology,25(2),320-330。  new window
8.Jeen, R. G.、Pigg, R.(1970)。Acquisition of an Aggressive Response and Its Generalization to Verbal Behavior。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,15(2),165-170。  new window
9.Lefkowitz, M. M.(1972)。Television Violence & Child Aggression: A Follow-up Study。Television & Social Behavior,8。  new window
10.Rotter, J. B.(1966)。Generalized Expectancies fox Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement。Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,80(1)=609,1-28。  new window
11.Ryckman, R. M.、Sherman, M. F.(1973)。Relationship Between Self-esteem and Inter-external Control for Men and Women。Psychological Reports,32(3),1106。  new window
12.蘇建文(19750600)。母親育兒方式與兒童攻擊行為關係之研究。教育心理學報,8,25-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Dodge, Kenneth A.、Coie, John D.(1987)。Social-Information-Processing Factors in Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Children's Peer Groups。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53(6),1146-1158。  new window
14.洪有義(19741200)。社會文化環境與內外制握的關係。中華心理學刊,16,187-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.內政部警政署刑事警察局(1991)。民國七十九年臺灣刑案統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂錘卿(1987)。我國兒童認同對象之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪振華(1985)。國中學生攻擊行為的研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡慶哲(1990)。國中學生認同對象之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張黛眉(1990)。影響小學學童攻擊行為以致社交地位之認知相關變項(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林適湖(1991)。社會控制理論與國中學生偏差行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.皮玉鳳(1989)。生氣控制訓練對國小高攻擊性兒童輔導效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.Parker-Cohen, N. Y.(1983)。The Effect of Temperament on Peer Relations(博士論文)。University of Virginia。  new window
8.Veltri, F. J.(1984)。Locus-of-Control & Trait Anxiety of Physically Disabled Adolescents(博士論文)。Indiana State University。  new window
9.陳金水(1989)。國民中學教師制握信念、工作經驗與組織承諾之關係(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾一泓(1976)。國中學生的控制信念與父母的控制信念及教養方式之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Geen, R. G.(1990)。Human aggression。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
3.Berkowitz, L.(1962)。Aggression: A social psychological analysis。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Phares, E. J.(1988)。Introduction to personality。Illionis:Scott, Foresman and Company。  new window
5.Bandura, Albert(1973)。Aggression: A social learning analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
6.張春興(1980)。心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lorenz, Konrad、王守珍(1986)。攻擊與人性。台北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳慧文、許麗玉(1990)。人生試題。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Santrock, J. W.(1981)。Adolescence。Iowa:William C. Brown Publishers。  new window
10.李美枝(1987)。社會心理學。台北:大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.張春興、楊國樞(1969)。心理學。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.林生傳(1990)。教育社會學。高雄市:復文。  延伸查詢new window
13.Atkinson, Rital L.、Atkinson, R. C.、Hilgard, E. R.(1983)。Introduction to psychology。Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Brody, G. H.(1981)。Selective Imitation of Same-age, Older, & Younger Peer Models(ED 251 373)。  new window
2.Schunk, D. H.,Hanson, A. R.(1985)。Influence of Peer Models on Children's Self-efficacy(ED 254 397)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bandura, A.(1983)。Psychological mechanisms of aggression。Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews. Vol.1: Theoretical and methodological issues。New York:Academic Press。  new window
2.Lefcourt, H. A.(1972)。Recent Developments in the Study of locus of Control。Progress in Experemental Personality Research。N.Y.:Academic Press。  new window
3.Lochman, J. E.(1984)。Psychological Characteristic and Assessment of Aggressive Adolescent。The Aggressive Adolescent: Clinical Perspective。N.Y.:A Division of Macmillan, Inc。  new window
4.Tedeschi, J. T.(1984)。A Social Psychological Interpretation of Human Aggression。Social Psychology of Aggression。Berlin:Spring-Veriag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE