:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:A Study of the Use of the Van Hiele Model in the Teaching of Non-Euclidean Geometry to Prospective Elementary School Teachers in Taiwan, the Republic of China
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:吳德邦
出版日期:1995
卷期:9
頁次:頁443-474
主題關鍵詞:范析理模式師範學院學生非歐幾何學學習成就幾何思考Van Hiele modelNon-Euclidean geometry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
     本研究之主要目的,係在使用由范析理(van Hiele)所發展出來的五段式學習模式於教學,以探討我國師範學院數學組學生在非歐幾何學的學習成就和幾何思考層次之成效。 本研究之研究對象為臺中師範學院兩班數學組學生,每班各有二十六名。兩組學生接受等量的非歐幾何學教材和相同的教學時數,但使用不同的教學策略。控制組學生是採傳統講授式教學法;實驗組學生則施以范析理五段式學習模式教學法。 本研究所獲得的結論如下:(a)我國師範學院數學組學生,在非歐幾何教學上,採用范析理五段式學習模式教學法比採用?統講授式教學法,更能產生較高的幾何思考層次;(b)我國師範學院數學組學生,在非歐何教學上,採用范析理五段學習模式教學法,其學習成就顯著高於採用傳統講授式教學法。 從本研究歸納出來的建議如下:(a)應嘗試在其他的實驗研究中,修改實驗變因;而范析理五段式學習模式和傳統講授式的混教學法,亦值得嘗試研究;(b)本研究僅在探究使用范析理五段式學習模式對我國師範院數學組學生在非歐幾何教學上之成效;爾後亦可針對我國中小學學生,探究使用范析理五段式學習模式之成效,進行類似的研究;(c)本研究運用非歐幾何學的課程,來探討范析理五段式學習模式在學習成就和幾何思考之成效,亦可運用范析理的五段式學習模式在其他的幾何和數學領域,做更深、更廣的研究;(d)對我國師範學院數學組學生而言,學習幾何學是符合未來課堂教學之需求,亦是期望達成之目標。而范析理學習模式與研究者從事之實驗研究相似,可將其方法統整、應用於數學組學生之幾何教學上。
期刊論文
1.Shaughnessy, J. M.、Burger, W. F.(1985)。Spadework prior to deduction in geometry。The Mathematics Teacher,78(6),419-428。  new window
2.Senk, S. L.(1989)。Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Writing Geometry Proofs。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,20(3),309-321。  new window
3.Usiskin, Z.、Senk, S.(1990)。Evaluating a test of van Hiele levels: A response to Crowley and Wilson。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21(3),245-342。  new window
4.Chen, M.、Wu, D.(1986)。A review of the psychological foundation of mathematics education theory for elementary schools。Journal of Taichung Junior Teachers' College,15,471-484。  new window
5.Cox, P. L.(1985)。Informal geometry-more is needed。Mathematics Teacher,78(6),404-405。  new window
6.Crowley, M. L.(1990)。Criterion-referenced reliability indices associated with the van Hiele geometry test。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21(3),238-241。  new window
7.Flores, A.(1993)。Pythagoras meets van Hiele。School Science and Mathematics,93(30),152-157。  new window
8.Fuys, D.(1985)。Van Hiele levels of thinking in geometry。Education and Urban Society,17(4),447-462。  new window
9.Gutierrez, A.、Jaime, D.、Fortuny, J. M.(1991)。An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the van Hiele levels。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,22(3),237-251。  new window
10.Hoffer, A.(1981)。Geometry is more than proof。Mathematics Teacher,74(1),11-18。  new window
11.Mayberry, J. W.(1983)。The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,14(1),58-69。  new window
12.Suydam, M. N.(1985)。The shape of instruction in geometry: Some highlights from research。Mathematics Teacher,78(6),481-486。  new window
13.Teppo, A.(1991)。Van Hiele levels of geometric thought revisited。Mathematics Teacher,84(3),210-221。  new window
14.Usiskin, Z. P.(1972)。The effects of teaching Euclidean geometry via transformations on student achievement and attitudes in tenth grade geometry。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,3(3),249-259。  new window
15.Usiskin, Z. P.(1974)。Transformations in high school before 1970。Mathematics Teacher,67(5),353-360。  new window
16.Usiskin, Z. P.(1980)。What should not be in the algebra and geometry curricula of average college-bound students。Mathematics Teacher,73(5),412-424。  new window
17.van Hiele, P. M.(1974)。System separation and transfer。Educational Studies in Mathematics,5(4),413-417。  new window
18.Usiskin, Z. P.、Coxford, A. F.(1972)。A transformational approach to tenth grade geometry。Mathematics Teacher,65(1),21-29。  new window
19.Wilson, M.(1990)。Measuring a van Hiele geometry sequence: A reanalysis。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21(3),230-237。  new window
20.Wilson, M.(1989)。A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development。Psychological Bulletin,105(2),276-289。  new window
21.Williams, E.(1980)。An investigation of senior high school students' understanding of the nature of mathematical proof。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,11(2),165-166。  new window
22.Burger, W. F.、Shaughnessy, J. M.(1986)。Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,17(1),31-48。  new window
會議論文
1.Dees, R. L.(1982)。Sex differences in Geometry Achievement。The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New York, NY。  new window
2.Fuys, D.、Geddes, D.(1984)。An investigation of van Hiele levels of thinking in geometry among sixth and ninth graders: Research findings and implications。The American Educational Research Association meeting in NEW Orleans, LA。  new window
研究報告
1.Burger, W. F.、Shaughnessy, J. M.(1986)。Assessing Children's intellectual growth in geometry。Covallis, OR:Oregon State University, Department of Mathematics。  new window
2.Burger, W. F.(1981)。Thought levels in geometry。Corvallis, OR:Oregon State University, Department of Mathematics。  new window
3.Mitchelmore, M. C.(1982)。Cooperative geometry research project。Mona, Jamaica:University of West Indies。  new window
4.Usiskin, Z. P.(1982)。Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago, Department of Education。  new window
學位論文
1.Chang, K. Y.(1992)。Spatial and geometric reasoning abilities of college students(博士論文)。Boston University。  new window
2.Corley, T. L.(1990)。Students' levels of thinking as related to achievement in geometry(博士論文)。Arizona State University,Tempe。  new window
3.Crowley, M. L.(1989)。The design and evaluation of an instrument for assessing mastery van Hiele levels of thinking about quadrilaterals(博士論文)。University of Maryland,College Park。  new window
4.Eberle, R. S.(1989)。The effects of instruction on the van Hiele levels of geometric reasoning in preservice elementary teachers(碩士論文)。The University of Texas at Austin。  new window
5.Finnell, L.(1992)。Metacognition and the van Hiele model of thinking in geometry(博士論文)。Georgia State University。  new window
6.Elchick, L. M.(1992)。The effects of software type, mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, locus of control, independent time of the investigation, and van Hiele level on geometric conjecturing ability(博士論文)。Pennsylvania State University。  new window
7.Land, J. E.(1990)。Appropriateness of the van Hiele model for describing students' cognitive processes on algebra tasks as typified by college students' learning of functions(博士論文)。Boston University。  new window
8.Lewellen, H.(1992)。Conceptualization of geometric motions in elementary school children: An extension of the van Hiele model(博士論文)。Kent State University。  new window
9.McClendon, M. E.(1990)。Application of the van Hiele model in evaluating elementary teachers' understanding of geometric concepts and improving their attitudes toward teaching geometry(博士論文)。University of South Florida,Sarasota。  new window
10.Mayberry, J. W.(1981)。An investigation of the van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers(博士論文)。University of Georgia。  new window
11.Naraine, B.(1989)。Relationships among eye fixation variables on task-oriented viewing of angles, van Hiele levels, spatial ability, and dependence(博士論文)。Ohio State University,Columbus。  new window
12.Molina, D. D.(1990)。The applicability of the van Hiele theory to transformational geometry(博士論文)。The University of Texas at Austin。  new window
13.Molina, D. D.(1987)。The teaching of transformational geometry in the secondary schools(碩士論文)。The University of Texas at Austin。  new window
14.Walker, J. D.(1973)。The value of the non-Euclidean geometries as enrichment(博士論文)。George Peabody College for Teachers,Nashville。  new window
15.Van Hiele-Geldof, D.(1957)。De didaktick van de Meetkunde in de eerset klass van het V.H.M.O.(博士論文)。University of Utrecht。  new window
16.Wilson, M.(1984)。A psychometric model of hierarchical development of three theories(博士論文)。The University of Chicago。  new window
17.Wu, D.(1985)。A comparison of the mathematics education of elementary schools in Taiwan, the Republic of China, with that of Boston, U. S.(碩士論文)。National Taiwan Normal University,Taipei。  new window
圖書
1.Borg, W. R.、Gall, M. D.(1989)。Educational research, an introduction。NY:Longman。  new window
2.Billstein, R.、Libeskind, S.、Lott, J. W.(1993)。A Problem solving approach to mathematics for elementary school teachers。Menlo Park, CA:The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
3.Cederberg, J. N.(1989)。A course in modern geometries。New York:Springer-Varlag Inc.。  new window
4.Chen, M.、Wu, D.、Lee, Y.(1987)。A comparative study of mathematics education for elementary and secondary schools in the Republic of China with that of the U. S.。Taipei:Provincial Taiwan Institution for Elementary School Teachers' Inservice Education。  new window
5.Courant, R.、Robbins, H.(1958)。What is Mathematics: An elementary approach to ideas and methods。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Freudenthal, H.(1973)。Mathematics as an educational task。Dordrecht, Holland:Reidel。  new window
7.Freudenthal, H.(1991)。Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures。Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
8.Heath, T. L.(1956)。The thirteen books of Euclid's elements。New York:Dover Publishing Inc.。  new window
9.Heath, T. L.(1921)。A history of Greek mathematics。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
10.Fuys, D.、Geddes, D.、Tischler, R.(1988)。The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.。  new window
11.Hoffer, A.(1979)。Geometry: A model of the universe。Manlo Park, CA:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
12.Henderson, K. B.(1973)。Geometry in the mathematics curriculum: Thirty-sixth yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
13.Lesh, R. A.、Landau, M.(1983)。Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
14.Liu, Hau(1991)。Geometric concepts misunderstood by elementary school teachers。  new window
15.Lin, C. J.(1992)。An analysis of the van Hiele level of geometric thought of children。Taichung:Su-hang Publishing Co.。  new window
16.Ministry of Education of the Republic of China(1985)。Curriculum standards for junior high school。Taipei:Cheng-Chung Publishing Co.。  new window
17.Ministry of Education of the Republic of China(1976)。Curriculum Standards for Elementary School。Taipei:Cheng-Chung Publishing Co.。  new window
18.Meserve, B. E.(1983)。Fundamental concepts of geometry。New York:Dover。  new window
19.Mcknight, C. C.、Crosswhite, F. J.、Dossey, J. A.、Kifer, E.、Swafford, J. O.、Travers, K. J.、Cooney, T. J.(1987)。The underachieving curriculum: Assessing schools mathematics from an international perspective。Champaign:Stipes Publishing Company。  new window
20.Ministry of Education of the Republic of China(1985)。Curriculum standards for high school。Taipei:Cheng-Chung Publishing Co.。  new window
21.National Research Council(1989)。Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
22.National Institute of Editing and Translating of the Republic of China(1979)。Mathematics textbooks of elementary school。Taipei:National Institute of Editing and Translating of the Republic of China。  new window
23.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991)。Professional standards for teaching mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
24.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
25.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.(1980)。An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980's。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
26.Senk, S. L.、Usiskin, Z.(1982)。Geometry proof writing: A new view of sex differences in mathematics ability。Chicago, IL:Department of Education, University of Chicago。  new window
27.O'Daffer, P. G.、Clemens, S. R.(1977)。Geometry: An investigative approach。Menlo Park, CA:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
28.Troutan, A.、Lichtenberg, B.(1991)。Mathematics: A good beginning strategies for teaching children。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
29.Texas Education Agency(1990)。Guidelines for teaching geometry。Austin, TX:Texas Education Agency。  new window
30.Texas Education Agency(1988)。Proclamation 65 of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on textbooks。Austin, TX:Texas Education Agency。  new window
31.Texas Education Agency(1986)。Mathematics framework, kindergarten-grade 12。Austin, TX:Texas Education Agency。  new window
32.van Hiele, Pierre M.(1986)。Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education。Academic Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Fuys, D.,Geddes, D.,Tischler, R.(1984)。English translations of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele,Columbus, OH:ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education。(No. ED 287 697)。  new window
2.Lesh, R. A.,Mierkiewicz, Diane B.(1987)。Recent research concerning the development of spatial and geometric concepts,Columbus, OH:ERIC/ SMEAC。(No. ED 159 062)。  new window
3.Martin, J. L.,Bradbard, D. A.(1976)。Space and geometry: Papers from a research workshop,Columbus, OH:ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education。(No. ED 132)。  new window
其他
1.Chang, K. Y.(1992)。Spatial and geometric reasoning abilities of college students。  new window
2.Finnell, L.(1993)。Metacognition and the van Hiele model of thinking in geometry。  new window
3.Elchick, L. M.(1992)。The effects of software type, mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, locus of control, independent time of the investigation, and van Hiele level on geometric conjecturing ability。  new window
4.Land, J. E.(1991)。Appropriateness of the van Hiele model for describing students' cognitive processes on algebra tasks as typified by college students' learning of functions。  new window
5.Lewellen, H.(1992)。Conceptualization of geometric motions in elementary school children: An extension of the van Hiele model。  new window
6.Mayberry, J. W.(1981)。An investigation of the van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers。  new window
7.Wilson, M.(1984)。A psychometric model of hierarchical development of three theories。  new window
圖書論文
1.Clements, D. H.、Battista, M. T.(1992)。Geometry and spatial Reasoning。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.。  new window
2.Coxford, A. F. Jr.(1973)。A transformation approach to Euclidean geometry。Geometry in the mathematics curriculum (36th) Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
3.Crowley, M. L.(1987)。The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought。Learning and teaching geometry, k-12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Reston, Va:NCTM。  new window
4.Coxford, A. F.(1978)。Research directions in geometry。Recent research concerning the development of spatial and geometric concepts。Columbus, OH:ERIC/SMEA。  new window
5.Hoffer, A.(1983)。Van Hiele based research。Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
6.Hershkowitz, R.、Bruckheimer, M.、Vinner, S.(1987)。Activities with teacher based on cognitive research。Learning and teaching geometry, k-12。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
7.Hershkowitz, R.、Bruckheimer, M.、Vinner, S.(1987)。Activities with teacher based on cognitive research。Learning and teaching geometry。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
8.Hoffer, A.(1988)。Geometry and visual thinking。Teaching mathematics in grades k-8。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。  new window
9.Lindquist, M. M.、Shulte, A. P.(1987)。Learning and teaching geometry, k-12。1987 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
10.Usiskin, Z. P.(1987)。Resolving the continuing dilemmas in school geometry。Learning and teaching geometry, k-12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teacher。  new window
11.Van Hiele, P. M.(1984)。A child's thought and geometry。English translations of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldorf and Pierre M. van Hiele。Columbus, OH:ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education。  new window
12.van Hiele, P. M.(1984)。English summary。English translations of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldorf and Pierre M. van Hiele。Columbus, OH:ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education。  new window
13.van Hiele, P. M.、van Hiele-Geldof, D.(1958)。A method of initiation into geometry。Report on methods of initiation into geometry。Groningen:J. B. Wolters。  new window
14.van Hiele-Geldof, D.(1984)。The didactics of geometry in the lowest class of secondary school。English translations of selected writing of Dina van Hiele-Geldorf and Pierre M. van Hiele。Columbus, OH:ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education。  new window
15.van Hiele-Geldof, D.(1984)。The didactics of geometry as a learning process for adults。English translations of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldorf and Pierre M. van Hiele。Columbus, OH:ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education。  new window
16.Wirszup, I.(1976)。Breakthroughs in the psychology of learning and teaching geometry。Space and geometry: Papers from a research workshop。Columbus, OH:ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE