資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.149.214.146)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
國小學童對學業不誠實行為之認知差異分析
書刊名:
教育心理學報
作者:
藍明智
出版日期:
1995
卷期:
28
頁次:
頁195-218
主題關鍵詞:
國小學童
;
認知差異
;
學業不誠實行為
;
Elementary school students
;
Cognitive differences
;
Academic misconduct behavior
;
Cheating
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
50
點閱:19
本研究之目的主要在探討國小學童對於構成「學業不誠實行為」之具體項目為何及不同背景的國小學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知差異。根據目的,本研究提出2個主要問題,並以6假設加以考驗。 本研究以台北市國小學為母群,抽取9所國小四、五、六年級學童為對象,共558名。本研究以學習行為調查表及學生基本資料調查表為研究工具;前一份調查表用來測量學生對於構成「學業不誠實行為」具體項目的同意度,後一份調查主要用來搜集學生的基本背景資料及學童在學校學習的成績。所搜集的資料分別以次數分配、適合度考驗、變異數分析及多系列相關等統計方法進行處理。本研究結果及結論如下:1.構成「學業不誠實行為」的具體項目大致可歸納為四大類型,2.年級不同的不誠實行為」的認知有部份差異存在,4.學童的學業成績和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知有正相關存在,5.學童的操行成績和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知有正相關存在,6.學童的家庭社經地位和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知無相關存在,7.學童的家庭社經地位和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知無相關存在。 最後,根據本研究之結果提出檢討與未來進一步之研究方向,並針對教育及輔導工作提供若干建議。
以文找文
There were two main purposes for this study. First, to understand a clear definition of what concrete behaviors were associated with academic cheating behavior in elementary school students. Second, to compare the attitudes of the seriousness of academic cheating behavior among students of different variables in elementary school. The variables included grade, sex, academic scores, moral scores teachers valued, social economic situation and the level of parents' education. 558 4-6 graders, 287 male and 271 female, were randomly drawn from nine elementary schools in Taipei City for this study. Research instruments used in this study were: Learning Behavior Scale designed to measure the individuals' judgement of the severity of academic cheating behavior and Tables of Students' Fundamental Records designed to collect the variables mentioned above. The data obtained were analyzed by frequency distribution, test of goodness of fit, one-way analysis of variance and multiple serial correlation. The major findings were summarized as follows: I. There were four types of academic cheating behavior. First, to gain answers on exam situation. Second, to offer answers on exam situation. Third, to rise scores by other skills out of the situations. Fourth, the inappropriate learning behaviors on ordinary learning situation or homework assignments. II. There was slight difference between different grades. Generally, there was no significant difference in attitudes between grades. III. There was significant difference on sex. Female students considered each of the thirty forms of academic dishonesty as more serious than male students. IV. There was positive correlation between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and academic scores. The more the students possessed in academic score, the more serious the students thought on academic cheating behavior. V. There was positive relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and moral scores teachers valued. The more the students were valued as high grade, the more serious the students thought on academic cheating behavior. VI. The relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and social economic situation (SES) was not significant. That is, no matter what SES the students stood, the attitude about academic cheating behavior was concurrent. VII. The relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and the parents' education level of students was not significant on grade 5 and 6, but there was significant relationship in father's educational level on grade 4, not in mother's. That is , the higher the fathers' education level of students was, the less serious the attitudes of students were about academic cheating behavior on grade 4. At the end of the thesis, results were discussed, the implications of this study in both education and further research in this field were also offered.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Drake, C. A.(1941)。Why students cheat。Journal of Higher Education,12,418-420。
2.
Pratt, C. B.、McLaughlin, G. W.(1989)。An analysis of predictors of college students' ethical inclinations。Research in Higher Education,30(2),195-219。
3.
陳英豪(19810600)。促進國民中小學學生道德發展教學實驗研究。教育學刊,3,166-113。
延伸查詢
4.
陳聰文(1981)。角色取替能力,同儕互動與道德判斷關係之研究。高雄師範學院教育學刊,3,49-110。
延伸查詢
5.
連寬寬(19901200)。道德教育的新途徑--價值教學在「生活與倫理」上的應用。國教月刊,37(3/4),22-27。
延伸查詢
6.
黃素惠(19921000)。國小道德認知教學之可行性。教育研究,27,58-66。
延伸查詢
7.
Anderson, W. F. Jr.(1957)。Attitudes of university students toward cheating。Journal of Educational Research,50,581-588。
8.
Barnett, D. C.、Dalton, J. C.(1981)。Why college student cheat。Journal of College Student Personnel,22(6),545-551。
9.
Bonjean, C. M.、McGee, R.(1965)。Scholastic dishonesty among undergraduates in differing systems of social control。Sociology of Education,38,127-137。
10.
Bushway, A.、Nash, W. R.(1977)。School cheating behavior。Review of Educational Research,47(4),623-632。
11.
Canning, R.(1956)。Does an honor system reduce classroom cheating?。Phi Delta Kappan,60,754。
12.
David, P.(1973)。Correlates of cheating behavior in a ghetto elementary school。Graduate Research. in Education and Related Disciplines,7,35-63。
13.
Ellenberg, F. C.(1973)。Cheating on tests: Are high achievers greater offenders than low achievers?。Cheating House,47,427-429。
14.
Fass, R. A.(1986)。By honor bound: Encouraging academic honesty。Educational Record,67(4),32-36。
15.
Feldman, S. E.、Feldman, M. T.(1967)。Transition of sex differences in cheating。Psychological Reports,20,957-958。
16.
Fowler, D. H.(1986)。Cheating: A bigger problem than meets the eye。NASSP Bulletin,70(493),93-96。
17.
Gross, M. M.(1946)。The effect of certain types of motivation on the ''honesty'' of children。Journal of Educational Research,40,133-140。
18.
Houston, J. P.(1983)。College classroom cheating, threat, sex and prior performance。College Student Journal,17(3),229-235。
19.
Jacobson, L. I.、Berger, S. E.、Millham, J.(1970)。Individual difference in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,15,48-56。
20.
Johnson, C. D.、Gormly, J.(1972)。Academic cheating: The contribution of sex, personality, and situational variables。Developmental Psychology,6,320-325。
21.
Kanfer, F. H.、Duerfeldt, P. H.(1968)。Age, class standing, and commitment as determinant of cheating in children。Child Development,39,545-557。
22.
Malinowski, C. I.、Smith, C. P.(1985)。Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg's theory。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(4),1016-1027。
23.
McQueen, R.(1957)。Examination deception as a function of residual background and immediate stimulus factors。Journal of Personality,25,643-650。
24.
Montor, K.(1971)。Cheating in high school。School and Society,99,96-98。
25.
Rogosin, H.(1951)。What about ''cheating'' on examination and honesty?。School and Society,74,402-403。
26.
Roskens, R. W.、Dizney, H. F.(1966)。A study of unethical academic behavior in high school and college。Journal of Educational Research,59(5),231-234。
27.
Schwartz, S. H.、Feldman, K. A.、Braum, M. E.、Heitgartner, A.(1969)。Some personality correlates of conducts in two situation of moral conduct。Journal of Personality,37,42-57。
28.
Sierles, F.、Hendrickx, I.、Circle, S.(1980)。Cheating in medical school。Journal of Medical Education,55,124-125。
29.
Smith, C. P.、Ryan, E. R.、Diggins, D. R.(1972)。Moral decision making: Cheating on examination。Journal of Personality,40,640-660。
30.
Stem, E. B.、Havlicek, L.(1986)。Academic Misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys。Journal of Allied Health,15(2),129-142。
31.
Tom, G.、Borin, N.(1988)。Cheating in academe。Journal of Education for Business,63(4),153-157。
32.
Uhlig, G. E.、Howes, B.(1967)。Attitudes toward cheating and opportunistic behavior。Journal of Educational Research,60,411-412。
33.
Vitro, F. T.(1971)。The relationship of classroom dishonesty to perceived parental discipline。Journal of College Student Personnel,12,427-429。
34.
Vitro, F. T.、Schoer, L. A.(1972)。The effects of possibility of test success, test importance, and detection on the incidence of cheating。Journal of School Psychology,10,269-277。
35.
Wright, J. C.、Kelly, R.(1974)。Cheating: Student/facuity views and responsibilities。Improving College and University Teaching,22,31-34。
36.
陳英豪(19790400)。討論與角色取替對道德認知發展之影響。教育學刊,1,325-361。
延伸查詢
37.
陳英豪(19771100)。我國青少年道德判斷的發展及其影響的因素。高雄師院學報,6,343-410。
延伸查詢
38.
陳英豪(19821000)。討論教學法對同質群體與異質群體道德認知發展影響的比較研究。教育學刊,4,168-130。
延伸查詢
39.
吳裕益(19821000)。認知發展與道德判斷、角色取代能力、創造力及人格的關係。教育學刊,4,212-169。
延伸查詢
40.
陳英豪(19800900)。修訂道德判斷測驗及其相關研究。教育學刊,2,356-318。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
沈六(1981)。道德認知發展與教學之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
謝明昆(1990)。道德成長的喜悅。台北:心理出版社。
延伸查詢
2.
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
延伸查詢
3.
教育部統計處(1992)。各級學校名錄。教育部統計處。
延伸查詢
4.
Bowers, W. I.(1964)。Student dishonesty and its control in college。New York:Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University。
5.
Hartshorne, H.、May, M. A.(1928)。Studies in the nature of character. Volume I: Studies in deceit。New York:Macmillan。
6.
Hersch, R. H.、Paolitto, D. P.、Reimer, J.(1979)。Promoting moral growth from Piaget to Kohlberg。New York:Longman, Inc。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
破解科學主義的魔咒
2.
學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:以學業自我效能為調節變項
3.
臺灣品德教育轉型與困境及其歷史脈絡的宏觀剖析
4.
《道德教育期刊》創刊40年之研究趨勢及其對我國教育啟示
5.
臺中市國小學生的道德發展現況及相關影響因素之研究
6.
探究國小六年級學童道德判斷層次之研究--以社會性科學議題為例
7.
論道德判斷與倫理發展之關係
8.
臺灣青少年次文化之初探研究
9.
國內運動道德之現況與推展策略探討
10.
職前中等學校教師在科學情境的道德判斷能力之研究
11.
臺灣地區民眾背景因素、教育程度與道德判斷相關性及其變遷之研究--以民國八十三年與八十八年做比較
12.
青少年勇於說不傾向與人格特質之關聯性研究
13.
臺灣一百大金融業大專程度從業人員職業道德與工作價值觀之研究
14.
國中家政科環境價值教學模式設計
15.
一般少年與犯罪少年道德認知發展之比較研究--Gibbs的道德認知發展理論之運用
1.
高雄市國小高年級資優生與一般生人權素養預測校園霸凌經驗徑路模式之比較研究
2.
黑格爾「教化」概念及其對臺灣中小學道德教育之蘊義
3.
國中情意課程對學生道德認知發展之影響
4.
國民小學學生遊戲學習與道德認知發展之研究
5.
高中學校道德氣氛與學生道德判斷發展之研究
1.
道德發展與行為之研究
2.
新教學理論與策略 : 自由開放社會中的個別化教學與後個別化教學
3.
華人道德思維的研究典範:後設理論分析
4.
華人道德思維的研究典範:後理論分析
5.
兩種道德:台灣社會中道德思維研究的在詮釋
6.
華人的道德觀與正義觀
7.
社會思慮發展研究在港、臺
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code