:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童對學業不誠實行為之認知差異分析
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:藍明智
出版日期:1995
卷期:28
頁次:頁195-218
主題關鍵詞:國小學童認知差異學業不誠實行為Elementary school studentsCognitive differencesAcademic misconduct behaviorCheating
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:19
     本研究之目的主要在探討國小學童對於構成「學業不誠實行為」之具體項目為何及不同背景的國小學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知差異。根據目的,本研究提出2個主要問題,並以6假設加以考驗。 本研究以台北市國小學為母群,抽取9所國小四、五、六年級學童為對象,共558名。本研究以學習行為調查表及學生基本資料調查表為研究工具;前一份調查表用來測量學生對於構成「學業不誠實行為」具體項目的同意度,後一份調查主要用來搜集學生的基本背景資料及學童在學校學習的成績。所搜集的資料分別以次數分配、適合度考驗、變異數分析及多系列相關等統計方法進行處理。本研究結果及結論如下:1.構成「學業不誠實行為」的具體項目大致可歸納為四大類型,2.年級不同的不誠實行為」的認知有部份差異存在,4.學童的學業成績和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知有正相關存在,5.學童的操行成績和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知有正相關存在,6.學童的家庭社經地位和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知無相關存在,7.學童的家庭社經地位和學童對於「學業不誠實行為」的認知無相關存在。 最後,根據本研究之結果提出檢討與未來進一步之研究方向,並針對教育及輔導工作提供若干建議。
      There were two main purposes for this study. First, to understand a clear definition of what concrete behaviors were associated with academic cheating behavior in elementary school students. Second, to compare the attitudes of the seriousness of academic cheating behavior among students of different variables in elementary school. The variables included grade, sex, academic scores, moral scores teachers valued, social economic situation and the level of parents' education. 558 4-6 graders, 287 male and 271 female, were randomly drawn from nine elementary schools in Taipei City for this study. Research instruments used in this study were: Learning Behavior Scale designed to measure the individuals' judgement of the severity of academic cheating behavior and Tables of Students' Fundamental Records designed to collect the variables mentioned above. The data obtained were analyzed by frequency distribution, test of goodness of fit, one-way analysis of variance and multiple serial correlation. The major findings were summarized as follows: I. There were four types of academic cheating behavior. First, to gain answers on exam situation. Second, to offer answers on exam situation. Third, to rise scores by other skills out of the situations. Fourth, the inappropriate learning behaviors on ordinary learning situation or homework assignments. II. There was slight difference between different grades. Generally, there was no significant difference in attitudes between grades. III. There was significant difference on sex. Female students considered each of the thirty forms of academic dishonesty as more serious than male students. IV. There was positive correlation between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and academic scores. The more the students possessed in academic score, the more serious the students thought on academic cheating behavior. V. There was positive relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and moral scores teachers valued. The more the students were valued as high grade, the more serious the students thought on academic cheating behavior. VI. The relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and social economic situation (SES) was not significant. That is, no matter what SES the students stood, the attitude about academic cheating behavior was concurrent. VII. The relationship between the attitudes of academic cheating behavior and the parents' education level of students was not significant on grade 5 and 6, but there was significant relationship in father's educational level on grade 4, not in mother's. That is , the higher the fathers' education level of students was, the less serious the attitudes of students were about academic cheating behavior on grade 4. At the end of the thesis, results were discussed, the implications of this study in both education and further research in this field were also offered.
期刊論文
1.Drake, C. A.(1941)。Why students cheat。Journal of Higher Education,12,418-420。  new window
2.Pratt, C. B.、McLaughlin, G. W.(1989)。An analysis of predictors of college students' ethical inclinations。Research in Higher Education,30(2),195-219。  new window
3.陳英豪(19810600)。促進國民中小學學生道德發展教學實驗研究。教育學刊,3,166-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳聰文(1981)。角色取替能力,同儕互動與道德判斷關係之研究。高雄師範學院教育學刊,3,49-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.連寬寬(19901200)。道德教育的新途徑--價值教學在「生活與倫理」上的應用。國教月刊,37(3/4),22-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃素惠(19921000)。國小道德認知教學之可行性。教育研究,27,58-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Anderson, W. F. Jr.(1957)。Attitudes of university students toward cheating。Journal of Educational Research,50,581-588。  new window
8.Barnett, D. C.、Dalton, J. C.(1981)。Why college student cheat。Journal of College Student Personnel,22(6),545-551。  new window
9.Bonjean, C. M.、McGee, R.(1965)。Scholastic dishonesty among undergraduates in differing systems of social control。Sociology of Education,38,127-137。  new window
10.Bushway, A.、Nash, W. R.(1977)。School cheating behavior。Review of Educational Research,47(4),623-632。  new window
11.Canning, R.(1956)。Does an honor system reduce classroom cheating?。Phi Delta Kappan,60,754。  new window
12.David, P.(1973)。Correlates of cheating behavior in a ghetto elementary school。Graduate Research. in Education and Related Disciplines,7,35-63。  new window
13.Ellenberg, F. C.(1973)。Cheating on tests: Are high achievers greater offenders than low achievers?。Cheating House,47,427-429。  new window
14.Fass, R. A.(1986)。By honor bound: Encouraging academic honesty。Educational Record,67(4),32-36。  new window
15.Feldman, S. E.、Feldman, M. T.(1967)。Transition of sex differences in cheating。Psychological Reports,20,957-958。  new window
16.Fowler, D. H.(1986)。Cheating: A bigger problem than meets the eye。NASSP Bulletin,70(493),93-96。  new window
17.Gross, M. M.(1946)。The effect of certain types of motivation on the ''honesty'' of children。Journal of Educational Research,40,133-140。  new window
18.Houston, J. P.(1983)。College classroom cheating, threat, sex and prior performance。College Student Journal,17(3),229-235。  new window
19.Jacobson, L. I.、Berger, S. E.、Millham, J.(1970)。Individual difference in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,15,48-56。  new window
20.Johnson, C. D.、Gormly, J.(1972)。Academic cheating: The contribution of sex, personality, and situational variables。Developmental Psychology,6,320-325。  new window
21.Kanfer, F. H.、Duerfeldt, P. H.(1968)。Age, class standing, and commitment as determinant of cheating in children。Child Development,39,545-557。  new window
22.Malinowski, C. I.、Smith, C. P.(1985)。Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg's theory。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(4),1016-1027。  new window
23.McQueen, R.(1957)。Examination deception as a function of residual background and immediate stimulus factors。Journal of Personality,25,643-650。  new window
24.Montor, K.(1971)。Cheating in high school。School and Society,99,96-98。  new window
25.Rogosin, H.(1951)。What about ''cheating'' on examination and honesty?。School and Society,74,402-403。  new window
26.Roskens, R. W.、Dizney, H. F.(1966)。A study of unethical academic behavior in high school and college。Journal of Educational Research,59(5),231-234。  new window
27.Schwartz, S. H.、Feldman, K. A.、Braum, M. E.、Heitgartner, A.(1969)。Some personality correlates of conducts in two situation of moral conduct。Journal of Personality,37,42-57。  new window
28.Sierles, F.、Hendrickx, I.、Circle, S.(1980)。Cheating in medical school。Journal of Medical Education,55,124-125。  new window
29.Smith, C. P.、Ryan, E. R.、Diggins, D. R.(1972)。Moral decision making: Cheating on examination。Journal of Personality,40,640-660。  new window
30.Stem, E. B.、Havlicek, L.(1986)。Academic Misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys。Journal of Allied Health,15(2),129-142。  new window
31.Tom, G.、Borin, N.(1988)。Cheating in academe。Journal of Education for Business,63(4),153-157。  new window
32.Uhlig, G. E.、Howes, B.(1967)。Attitudes toward cheating and opportunistic behavior。Journal of Educational Research,60,411-412。  new window
33.Vitro, F. T.(1971)。The relationship of classroom dishonesty to perceived parental discipline。Journal of College Student Personnel,12,427-429。  new window
34.Vitro, F. T.、Schoer, L. A.(1972)。The effects of possibility of test success, test importance, and detection on the incidence of cheating。Journal of School Psychology,10,269-277。  new window
35.Wright, J. C.、Kelly, R.(1974)。Cheating: Student/facuity views and responsibilities。Improving College and University Teaching,22,31-34。  new window
36.陳英豪(19790400)。討論與角色取替對道德認知發展之影響。教育學刊,1,325-361。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.陳英豪(19771100)。我國青少年道德判斷的發展及其影響的因素。高雄師院學報,6,343-410。  延伸查詢new window
38.陳英豪(19821000)。討論教學法對同質群體與異質群體道德認知發展影響的比較研究。教育學刊,4,168-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.吳裕益(19821000)。認知發展與道德判斷、角色取代能力、創造力及人格的關係。教育學刊,4,212-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.陳英豪(19800900)。修訂道德判斷測驗及其相關研究。教育學刊,2,356-318。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.沈六(1981)。道德認知發展與教學之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝明昆(1990)。道德成長的喜悅。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部統計處(1992)。各級學校名錄。教育部統計處。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bowers, W. I.(1964)。Student dishonesty and its control in college。New York:Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University。  new window
5.Hartshorne, H.、May, M. A.(1928)。Studies in the nature of character. Volume I: Studies in deceit。New York:Macmillan。  new window
6.Hersch, R. H.、Paolitto, D. P.、Reimer, J.(1979)。Promoting moral growth from Piaget to Kohlberg。New York:Longman, Inc。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE