Target Oriented Curriculum and Inter-School Comparison__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	Target Oriented Curriculum and Inter-School Comparison
書刊名：	教育學報
作者：	侯傑泰／葉明浩／成子娟
作者(外文)：	Hau, Kit-tai／Ip, Ming-ho／Cheng, Zijuan
出版日期：	1996
卷期：	24:2
頁次：	頁1-13
主題關鍵詞：	目標為本課程
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:14

Target Oriented Curriculum (TOC) has been described as one of the major educational reforms in Hong Kong in the last 20 or 30 years. Among the many changes to be implemented, the emphasis on performance (authentic/alternative) assessment is of top priority, which includes the use of more practical work, essays, open-ended problems, and portfolios of student work. Though most teachers are now only using self-constructed performance tasks, there have been research and recommendations to examine how such assessment can be linked to high-stake student selection decisions. It is likely that classroom performance assessment of the pupils will be used for accountability (e.g., comparison of school effectiveness) and secondary school place allocation (SSPA) purposes. However, there are already challenges from principals, teachers and educational bodies on the TOC and its related assessment. It is argued here that such a movement towards inter-school comparison of performance task results will lead to the demands for greater specifiity in the assessment criteria, extra time spent on assessment, higher comparability in tasks for all students, and more reliable tasks. All of these will in turn cause greater resistance from teachers and the general public and hence will defeat our original good intention to emphasize more performance-based assessment.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Hau, K. T.、Salili, F.(1996)。Prediction of academic performance among Chinese students: Effort can compensate for lack of ability。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes，65，83-94。
2.	Linn, R. L.(1993)。Educational Assessment: Expanded Expectations and Challenges。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，15(1)，1-16。
3.	Berk, R. A.(1986)。A Consumer's Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-referenced Tests。Review of Educational Research，56(1)，137-172。
4.	Linn, Robert L.、Baker, Eva L.、Dunbar, Stephen B.(1991)。Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria。Educational Researcher，20(8)，15-21。
5.	Sadler, D. R.(1987)。Specifying and promulgating achievement standards。Oxford Review of Education，13(2)，191-209。
6.	Messick, Samuel(1994)。The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments。Educational Researcher，23(2)，13-23。
7.	Baker, E. L.、O'Neil, H. F.、Linn, R. L.(1993)。Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment。American Psychologist，48，1210-1218。
8.	Hau, K. T.、Salili, F.(1991)。Structure and semantic differential placement of specific causes: Academic causal attributions by Chinese students in Hong Kong。International Journal of Psychology，26(2)，175-193。
9.	Worthen, B. R.(1993)。Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment。Phi Delta Kappan，74，444-454。
10.	Biggs, J.(1994)。What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West。Australian Educational Researcher，21(1)，19-39。
11.	Bracey, G. W.(1993)。Assessing the new assessments。Principal，72(3)，34-36。
12.	Cizek, G. J.(1993)。Reconsidering standard ad criteria。Journal of Educational Measurement，30，93-106。
13.	Hanson, R. A.、Schutz, R. E.(1986)。A comparison of methods for measuring achievement in basic skills program evaluation。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，8，101-113。
14.	Huynh, H.、Casteel, J.(1985)。A comparison of the minimax and Rasch approach to set simultaneous passing scores for subtests。Journal of Educational Statistics，10，334-344。
15.	Madaus, G. F.、Kellaghan, T.(1993)。The British experience with "authentic" testing。Phi Delta Kappan，74(6)，462-469。
16.	Popham, W. J.(1993)。Circumventing the high costs of authentic assessment。Phi Delta Kappan，74，470-473。
17.	Popham, W. J.(1993)。Educational testing in America: What is right, what is wrong? A criterion-referenced perspective。Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice，12(1)，11-14。
18.	Schagen, I. P.(1993)。Problems in measuring the reliability of National Curriculum Assessment in England and Wales。Educational Studies，19，41-54。
19.	Torrance, H.(1993)。Combining measurement-driven instruction with authentic assessment: Some initial observations of National Assessment in England and Wales。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，15，81-90。
20.	Zieky, M.(1989)。Methods of setting standards of performance on criterion referenced tests。Studies in Educational Evaluation，15，335-338。

會議論文
1.	Biggs, J.(19941127)。Assumptions underlying new approaches to educational assessment: Implications for Hong Kong。Hong Kong Educational Association Annual Conference。City University of Hong Kong。

圖書
1.	Hong Kong Education Commission(1990)。Education Commission report。Hong Kong：Government Printer。
2.	Lee, P. T.(1996)。Response to TOC assessment guideline。Hong Kong：C.C.C. Primary School Principals Association。
3.	(1994)。Report of Advisory Committee on implementation of target oriented curriculum。Hong Kong：Education Department。
4.	Wong, C. K.(1996)。Comments on TOC assessment guideline。Hong Kong：S. K. H. Primary Schools Council School Principals' Association。

圖書論文
1.	Stevenson, H. W.、Lee, S.-Y.(1996)。The academic achievement of Chinese students。The handbook of Chinese psychology。Hong Kong：Oxford University Press。
2.	Hau, K. T.、Salili, F.(1996)。Achievement goals and causal attributions of Chinese students。Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development。Hong Kong：The Chinese University Press。
3.	Chen, C. S.、Lee, S. Y.、Stevenson, H. W.(1996)。Academic achievement and motivation of Chinese students: A cross-national perspective。Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development。Hong Kong：The Chinese University Press。
4.	Broadfoot, P.(1995)。Performance assessment in perspective: International trends and current English experience。Evaluating authentic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment。Buckingham：Open University。
5.	McCallum, B.、Gipps, C.、McAlister, S.、Brown, M.(1995)。National curriculum assessment: Emerging models of teacher assessment in the classroom。Evaluating authentic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment。Buckingham：Open University。
6.	Torrance, H.(1995)。Teacher involvement in new approaches to assessment。Evaluating authentic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment。Buckingham：Open University。
7.	Wolf, A.(1995)。Authentic assessments in a competitive sector: Institutional prerequisites and cautionary tales。Evaluating authentic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment。Buckingham：Open University。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	學習回饋及系統監察 : 香港的經驗
2.	九十年代香港的課程改革
3.	Performance-Based Assessment: Problems and Design Strategies

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫