:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:基隆港貨櫃基地生產效率之資料包絡分析
書刊名:運輸學刊
作者:藍武王李怡容高傳凱
作者(外文):Lan, Lawrence W.Lee, Yi-jungKao, Chwan-kai
出版日期:1997
卷期:10:2=36
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡分析貨櫃基地生產效率Data envelopment analysisContainer terminalProductive efficiency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:67
     本文嘗試採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)來評估基隆港三個貨櫃基地歷年之生產效率。 藉由效率分析、差額分析及敏感度分析,說明投入要素與產出組合未充分運用之程度,以及 造成生產無效率的原因。分析結果發現,基隆港第三貨櫃基地平均生產效率最高 (平均效率 值為 0.9529),第一貨櫃基地次之 (0.9243), 第二貨櫃基地因後線作業量較少,效率最低 (0.8171)。能源、橋式機、後線機具等資源未能充分運用,係造成各貨櫃基地生產無效率的 主要原因。本文建議,短期內基隆港各貨櫃基地應加強機具之維修保養;第一貨櫃基地應加 強橋式機的維修汰換,惟其總數可維持不變;第二貨櫃基地之後線機具可考慮出租或售予航 商;第一貨櫃基地與第三貨櫃基地間之船舶修造廠應予以遷移,將兩貨櫃基地合併,俾利後 線場地、機具互相支援,以及碼頭工人靈活調用。長期而言,未來貨櫃基地之棧埠作業宜朝 民營化方向的努力,可考慮由碼頭工人自組裝公司進行裝卸作業,以提昇生產效率。
     This paper attempts to evaluate the productive efficiency of Keelung Port container terminals by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique. The causes and extent of inefficiency for input factors and output combinations are explained via efficiency analysis, slack analysis, and sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that terminal No.3 has the highest average efficiency (0.9529), followed by terminal No. 1 (0.9243). Terminal No. 2 has the lowest average efficiency (0.8171) due mainly to insufficient yard handling activities. The results also show that energy consumption, quay cranes, and yard machines are the major factors responsible for productive inefficiency. To improve the container handling efficiency, we suggest that Keelung Port Authority enhance the maintenance of container equipment, sell or rent yard equipment to the yard leaseholder for terminal No. 2, relocate the Ship & Machinery Works between terminals No. 1 & No. 3 so that both yards can share the equipment and stevedores. Finally, privatization of terminal operations by encouraging stevedores to form a container handling company seems a promising direction in enhancing the productive efficiency.
期刊論文
1.王丘明、藍武王、黃承傳(19950300)。基隆港貨櫃基地生產力成長分析。運輸計劃,24(1),89-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Roll, Y.、Hayuth, Y.(1993)。Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)。Maritime Policy and Management,20(2),153-161。  new window
3.Dowd, T. J.、Leschine, T. M.(1990)。Container terminal productivity: a perspective。Maritime Policy and Management,17(2),107-112。  new window
4.顧志遠、張國平(19900300)。數據包絡分析(DEA) 效率評估方法之應用--以臺北市公車為例。運輸計劃,19(1),27-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dyson, R. G.、Thanassoulis, E.(1988)。Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis。Journal of the Operational Research Society,39(6),563-576。  new window
6.高傳凱(1994)。基隆港貨櫃基地營運績效評估。港埠研究報告,40,26-59。  延伸查詢new window
7.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
8.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
學位論文
1.高蓓華(1990)。公民營事業生產效率之評估--以台北市公車系統為例(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王丘明(1995)。基隆港貨櫃場站成本結構與生產力分析(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳雅音(1992)。臺鐵成本結構之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Thomas, B. J.(1985)。Operations Planning in Ports。Cardiff:Department of Maritime Studies, University of Wales, Institute of Science and Technology。  new window
2.Carl, H.、Plumlee, P. E.(1979)。Port Performance Index。Port Hueneme, CA:Public Works Consultants。  new window
3.吳榮貴(1990)。貨物裝卸作業指標研究參考意見。臺北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hoffman, P.(1985)。Performance indicators and productivity。Port Management Textbook Containerization。Bremen。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE