:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國柏金斯職業與應用科技教育法案之計畫方案與實施成效--兼論國內技職教育改革的省思
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:邱兆偉
作者(外文):Chiou, Jaw-woei
出版日期:1997
卷期:13
頁次:頁1-46
主題關鍵詞:美國柏金斯職業與應用科技教育法案技職教育
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:72
     本文的研究目的,在探討美國一九九0年《柏金斯職業與科技教育法案》有關的 技職教育之目的、經費授權、計畫方案、實施成效,以及其對國內教改的啟示。本文的主要 研究方法,包括文獻調查、檔案資料分析,以及比較研究三種方法。擬將運用此等方法,而 獲得的主要研究結果, 分述如次:1. 美國一九九0年《柏金斯職業與應用科技教育法案》 的主要目的,質言之,為:<促使美國在世界經濟上更具有競爭力。> 2. 上述一九九0年 法案的經費授權,自 10 億美元增至 16 億美元,並藉延續、改組及創新的方式而擴大計畫 方案的項目。 3. 上述法案的重大變革,包括:(1) 技術預備教育之類的創新計畫方案,及 (2) 有關績效責任的表現性標準與量尺。 4. 上述法案自實施以後,在技職教育的就學機會 、學校提供的支授服務,以及畢業後的工作機會三方面上,未對於特殊族群學生造成不利的 效應。 5. 全國學區就上述法案有關的十八個項目進行成效評估,其中有十六項受到五成以 上的學區予以肯定。最受肯定而有強烈共識者為:(1) 增進整合學術與技職學科之作法,及 (2) 增進學區學程改進之努力。 6. 根據上述發現,本文為國內技職教育的改革問題提供了 若干參考建議。
     The principal objective of this study is to investigate the "Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act," passed by U.S. Congress in 1990. The main topics included in this study are the aim of vocation-tecnical education, the funds authorization, the najor programs authorized, the actual changes occured in vocational-technical education, and the implications to education reform in Taiwan, R.O.C. Three major research methods are used in this study--literature survey, documentary analysis, and comparative study. Some significant results which are secured from the application of these methods, are stated as follows: 1. The purpose of this Act is to make the United States more competitive in the world economy by developing more fully the academic and occupational skills of all segments of the population. 2. There are authorized to be appropriated $1,600,000,000 for the fiscal year 1991 and such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995 for this Act. 3.Among important changes in vocational-technical education are:(1) creation of tech prep education program, and (2) accountability-related performance standards and measures.4. During early 1990s, there were no adverse effects on participation of vocational-technical education, support services offered by high schools, and work opportunities after high school graduation for the special group students. However, there were some disadvantages in entering 2-year and 4-year colleges to this group of students.5. Based upon the views of the respresentative school districts surveyed on the effects on the ability of the 1990 Act to produce quality programs, more than half of the districts rated 16 out of 18 items as "greatty increased" or "increased." Two of these items were rated by "greatly increased" or "increased" by more than 70% of school districts. These two items were: "Use of integration of academic and vocation al-technical courses" and "Your district's program improvement efforts."6. Based upon the findings cited, some recommendations are made for vocational-technical education reform here in Taiwan, R.O.C.
期刊論文
1.邱兆偉(19970100)。美國全國教育目標經緯與國內教育改革目標檢討。中華民國比較教育學會比較教育通訊,43,1-25。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kochhar, Carol A.(1995)。Capitol Capsule: Equity and Vocational Education's Break's "Break with the Past"。Journal for Vocational Special Needs Population,17(2),68-72。  new window
3.Repetto, Jeanne B.、Nenbert, Debra A.(1992)。Serving Individuals with Special Needs through Professional Development: Meeting the Interest of the Act。Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education,14(2/3),2-3。  new window
4.Sarkees-Wircenski, Michelle D.、Wircenski, Jerry L.(1992)。Performance standards and Measures for Vocational Education Programs: Meeting School Reform through Vocational Programs。Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education,14(2/3),28-32。  new window
會議論文
1.Anderson, Lowell D.(1992)。Relationship of Technology Education to Tech Prep。The Mississippi Valley Industrial Teacher Education Annual Conference 79th,(會議日期: 1992/11)。Chicago, IL。  new window
2.App, Anne H.(1991)。Summary proceedings of The Design Conference for the National Assessment of Vocational Education。The Design Conference for the National Assessment of Vocational Education,National Assessment of Vocational Education (會議日期: March 13-15, 1991)。Washington, DC。  new window
3.Benton, Thomas、Woloszyk, Carl A.(1993)。Establishing a Tech Prep Curriculum for marketing Education。The Tech Prep for Marketing Careers Conference,(會議日期: 1993/01/31)。Denver, CO。  new window
4.Kister, Joanna(1993)。Two Perspectives: Perkins II Accountability. OBE/Education Reform Movement。the Annual Conference of the American Vocational Association,(會議日期: December 3-7, 1993)。Nashville, TN。  new window
5.Rnhland, Sheila K.(1995)。Evolving a Model for Evaluating Tech Prep Implementation。Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: April 18-22, 1955)。San Francisco, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.Grubb, W. Norton、Stasz, Cathy(1992)。Assessing the Integration of Academic and Vocational Education: Methods and Questions。Berkeley, CA:National Center for Research in Vocational Education, The University at Berkeley。  new window
2.Irwin, Paul M.、Apling, Richard(1991)。Vocational Education: Major Provisions of the 1990 Amendments (P.L.101-392)。Washington, DC:Congress Research Service, Library of Congress。  new window
圖書
1.吳京(1997)。迎接新世紀開展新教育。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第二期諮議報吿書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.National Commission on Excellence in Education(1983)。A Nation at Risk: The Imperatives for Educational Reform。Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
4.行政院教育改革委員會(1996)。第三期諮議報吿書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1995)。第一期諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革第四期諮議報告書。臺北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱兆偉(1997)。美國教育改革研究。台北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Boesel, David、McFarland, Laurel(1994)。National Assessment of Vocational Education: Final Report to Congress. Volume I, Summary and Recommendations。Washington, DC:National Assessment of Vocational Education。  new window
9.Boesel, David(1994)。National Assessment of Vocational Education: Final Report to Congress. Volume II. Participation in Quality of Vocational Education。Washington, DC:National Assessment of Vocational Education。  new window
10.Centron, Marvin(1985)。Schools of the Future: How American Business and Education Can Cooperate to Save Our Schools。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.Boesel, David(1994)。National Assessment of Vocational Education: Final Report to Congress. Volume III, Program Improvement: Educational Reform。Washington, DC:National Assessment of Vocational Education。  new window
12.Education Comission of the States(1983)。Action for Excellence: A Comprehensive Plan to Improve Our Nations Schools。  new window
13.Hudson, Lisa(1994)。National Assessment of Vocational Education: Final Report to Congress. Vol VI, Access to Programs and Services for Special Populations。Washington, DC:National Assessment of Vocational Education。  new window
14.Lankard, Bettina A.(1992)。Tech Prep Trends and Issues Alerts。Columbus, Ohio:ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education。  new window
15.Muraskin, Lana(1994)。National Assessment of Vocational Education: Final Report to Congress. Volume V, Funding and Administration。Washington, DC:National Assessment of Vocational Education。  new window
16.Naisbitt, John、Aburdence, Patricia(1985)。Reinventing the Corporation。New York:Warner Books。  new window
17.Peters, Thomas J.、Waterman, Robert H. Jr.(1982)。In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's from America's Best Run Companion。  new window
18.Pulliam, John D.、Van Patten, James(1995)。History of Education in America。EngleWood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill, an imprint of Prentice Hall。  new window
19.U.S. General Accounting Office (Health, Education, and Human Service Division)(1995)。Vocational education: changes at high school level after amendments to Perkins Act: report to congressional committees。  new window
20.U.S. General Accounting Office (Health, Education, and Human Service Division)(1995)。Vocational education: 2-year colleges improve programs, maintain access for special populations: report to congressional committees。  new window
21.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Brown, James, M.(1991)。Integrating Academic Skills into Postsecondary Education Programs through Accomodation Teams(ED 333167)。  new window
2.Brustein, Michael(1993)。AVA Guide to Federal Funding for Tech Prep(ED 365777)。  new window
3.Christenson, Leo,Davis, Joan(1995)。Trends in the Distribution of state and Federal Funds for Vocational Education in Minnesota: Fiscal Years 1986 to 1992(ED 381636)。  new window
4.Crane, Eric C.(1995)。Perkins-JTPA Evaluation, Analysis of the Adequacy, Effectiveness, and Coordination for the Two Years Ending June 30, 1994(ED 385754)。  new window
5.ERIC(1994)。Sex Equity, Single Parents, Displaced Homemakers, Single Pregnant Women's Project Directory FY-1994(ED 368871)。  new window
6.Fadale, Laverna M.,Zhao, Peisheng(1992)。Sex Equity, Single Parent, Displaced Home-maker, Single Pregnant Women 40 Programs: Guidebook for Equity Accountability System(ED 356012)。  new window
7.Green, James L.(1993)。The Integration of Academics and Vocational Education. A Study for the Commonwealth(ED 375269)。  new window
8.Hargroder, Margaret(1993)。Louisiana’s Achievements for Sex Equity in Vocational Education 1992-93(ED 382816)。  new window
9.Hill, Paul T.(1992)。Pandora's Box: Accountability and Performance Standards in Vocational Education(ED 353408)。  new window
10.Imel, Susan(1991)。Implications of the New Perkins Act. Trends and Issues Alerts(Ed 340946)。  new window
11.McAuliffe, Anne(1992)。Gender Equity in Vocational Education. WEEA Digest(ED 359433)。  new window
12.Schmidt, June B.(1992)。Integrating Academic and Vocational Education: Guidelines for Secondary School Principals(ED 335424)。  new window
13.Stammen, Ronald M.(1991)。State Assessment for Public Law 101-392(ED 352497)。  new window
14.Stecher, Brian M.(1995)。Improving Performance Measures and Standards for Workforce Education(ED 382802)。  new window
15.Stecher, Brian M.,Hanser, Lawrence M.(1992)。Beyond Vocational Education Standards and Measures: Strengthening Local Accountability Systems for Pmgram Improvement(ED 354343)。  new window
16.Stecher, Brian M.,Hanser, Lawrence M.(1995)。Accountability in Workforce Training(ED 383841)。  new window
17.Texas Education Agency(1993)。Vocational and Academic Integration: Preparing Texas Students for the Work Force, Evaluation Report(ED 361486)。  new window
其他
1.(19970327)。我競爭力退至全球24名。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19970407)。經濟表現不佳,我競爭力直落主因。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳榮裕(19970304)。高職免試,國中成績佔75%。  延伸查詢new window
4.江昭青(19970324)。李遠哲:吳京和教改會理念不相符。  延伸查詢new window
5.王融見(19970324)。吳京:升大學有三條國道。  延伸查詢new window
6.(19970405)。台灣競爭力大幅滑落,排名24。  延伸查詢new window
7.(19970327)。財經官員吃驚又沮喪。  延伸查詢new window
8.(19970405)。技術學院三年內增至50所。  延伸查詢new window
9.(19970407)。國家競爭力學者。  延伸查詢new window
10.(19970407)。三項指標拖下我競爭力,IMD:司法公正、社會安全及政府效率表現都欠佳。  延伸查詢new window
11.(19970325)。推動「技職教改」中程計畫,政院五年內編列90億預算。  延伸查詢new window
12.(19970404)。技職教師碩士學分進修班,教部下學年開班。  延伸查詢new window
13.(19970320)。高職免試入學,實施細節公布。  延伸查詢new window
14.(19970327)。我競爭力直直落,經建會大驚。  延伸查詢new window
15.(19970327)。立委指對連內閣是大警訊。  延伸查詢new window
16.(19970407)。競爭策略理論大師波特今來台為我把脈。  延伸查詢new window
17.(19970407)。波特:台灣須發展新經濟視野。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.邱兆偉(1993)。美國師範教育現況與趨勢。邁向二十一世紀之教育改革。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fischer, Joseph(1970)。Guide to the Comparative Study of Educational Systems。The Social Sciences and the Comparative study of Educational Systems。Scramton, Penn:International-Textbook Co。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE