:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:養豬場作業環境暴露危害研究
書刊名:勞工安全衛生研究季刊
作者:張靜文鍾弘黃金鳳蘇慧貞
作者(外文):Chang, Ching-wenChung, HungHuang, Ching-shungSu, Jenny
出版日期:1997
卷期:5:3
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:生物氣膠養豬業職業衛生BioaerosolsSwine feed industryOccupational health
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:28
     文獻指出養豬工人表現出較高比率的呼吸道疾患與肺功能不適的現象,而研究亦發 現存在於養豬場的生物性氣膠與粉塵對引發此一健康效應上扮演重要角色,然目前國內對此 問題之了解仍極有限。本研究即希望能對國內養豬場生物性氣膠暴露危害情況予以量化,並 同時評估其他空氣污染物。研究對象為國內六所養豬頭數一萬頭以上之養豬場。空氣中微生 物係以玻璃液體衝擊瓶(AGI)或單階式安德森微生物探樣器(AMS)採集,並經培養後計數形成 菌落;粉塵與三種氣體(氨氣、二氧化碳與硫化氫)則分別以濾紙秤重及擴散式檢知管測量;細 菌內毒素則以Limulus am魄bmoebocyte lysate方法定量。結果顯示,豬舍內空氣中總細菌 平均濃度為3.3x10□CFU/m□,革蘭氏陰性細菌平均濃度則為143.7CFU/m□,總真菌濃度則 在10□CFU/m□範圍,並以Cladosporium為主要菌屬。總細菌內毒素平均濃度為139.53 EU/m □,個人可呼吸性細菌內毒素平均濃度則為46.96 EU/m□。總粉塵平均濃度為0.15-0.34 mg/m □,個人可呼吸粉塵平均為0.14mg/m□。氨氣與硫化氫分別低於5 ppm與0.2 ppm,二氧化 碳則介於600 ppm與894 ppm之間。比較不同豬舍發現,肉豬後期舍為微生物與氣體暴露較 高之豬舍,保育舍中總粉塵與總內毒素量亦高於其他舍別。另外,民營豬舍內污染情形均較 公營豬舍嚴重。未來宜應加強其作業場所衛生之管理。
     Literature has shown that swine workers may suffer from high prevalence of respiratory symptoms, and has suggested that bioaerosols and airborne dusts present in swine feed buildings may play an important role. However, very limited information is available in Taiwan. This study was to quantify the exposure of bioaerosols and other coexistent contaminants within swine feed stalls - Six swine feed fields with more than 10,000 pigs were selected. Airborne concentrations of bacteria and fungi were determined by collecting them Onto appropriate media using All-glass impinger or single-stage Andersen Microbial Sampler. Gases (Nil3, CO2 and H2S) and airborne duss were quantified respectively by using Drager diffusion tubes and filter-weighing method - The Limulusamoebocyte lysate assay was selected to determine airborne endotoxin. Results showed the mean concentration of total bacteria and gram- negative bacteria was 3.3 x10□ CFU/m□ and 143.7 CFU/m□, respectively. The airborne concentration of total fungi was about CFU/m□, with C1adosporium as the most dominant species. Average concentration of total bacterial endotoxin was calculated to be 139.53 EU/rn3, while that for respirable endotoxin was 46.96 EU/rn3. Mean concentration of total dust was between 0.15 mg/rn3 and 0.34 mg/rn3, with average level of respirable dust of 0.14 mg/rn3. The respective concentrations of NH3, CO2 and H2S were measured to be less than 5 ppm, 600-894 ppm and less than 0.2 ppm. It also indicated that the finishing house present the highest exposure risk to airborne microorganisms, NH3, CO2 and H2S. Airborne concentrations of total dust and endotoxin in the nursing house were higher than those in other swine houses. The results suggest that it is necessary to improve the environmental sanitation in swine feed workplaces.
期刊論文
1.Thorne, P. S.、Kiekhaefer, M. S.、Whitten, P.、Donham, K. J.(1992)。Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine。Applied and environmental microbiology,58(8),2543-2551。  new window
2.Crook, B.、Robertson, J. F.、Travers Glass, S. A.、Bothoroyd, E. M.、Lacey, J.、Topping, M. D.(1991)。Airborne dust, Ammonia, Microorganisms and Antigens in Pig Confinement Houses and the Respiratory Health of Exposed Farm Workers。Aw. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. L.,52(7),271-279。  new window
3.Cormier, Y.、Boulet, L-P.、Bedard, G.、Tremblay, G.(1991)。Respiratory Health of Workers Exposed to Swine Confinement BuildingsonlyortobothSwine Confinement Buildings and Dairy Barns。Scand J. Work Environ. Health,17,269-275。  new window
4.Zhou, C.、Hurst, T. S.、Cockcroft, D. W.、Dosman, J. A.(1991)。Increased Airways Responsiveness in Swine Farmers。Chest,99(4),941-944。  new window
5.Heederik, D.、Brouwer, R.、Biersteker, K.、Boleij, J. S. M.(1991)。Relationship of Airborne Endotoxin and Bacteria Levels in Pig Farms with the Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms of Farmers。Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health,62,595-601。  new window
6.Rylander, R.、Donham, K. J.、Hjort, C.、Brouwer, R.、Heederik, D.(1989)。Effects of Exposure to Dust in Swine Confinement Buildings - A Working Group Report。Scand, J. Work Environ. Health,15,309-312。  new window
7.Attwood, P.、Brouwer, R.、Ruigewaard, P.、Versloot, P.、Wtt, R. D.、Heederik, D.、Boleij, J. S. M.(1987)。A Study of the Relationship between Airborne Contaminants and Environmental Factors in Dutch Swine Confinement Buildings。Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.,48(8),745-751。  new window
8.Donham, K.、Haglind, P.、Peterson, Y.、Rylander, R.、Belin, L.(1989)。Environmental and Health Studies of Farm Workers in Swidish Swine Confinement Buildings。Br. J. Ind. Med.,46,31-37。  new window
9.Haglind, P.、Rylander, R.(1987)。Occupational Exposure and Lung Function Measurements among Workers in Swine Confinement Buildings。J. Occup. Med.,29(11),904-907。  new window
10.Zuskin, E.、Zagar, Z.、Schachter, E. N.、Mustajbegovic, J.、Kern, J.(1992)。Respiratory Symptoms and Ventilatory Capacity in Swine Confinement Workers。Br. J. Ind. Med.,49,435-440。  new window
11.Burrelll, R.(1991)。Microbilolgical Agents as Health Risks in Indoor Air。Environ. Health Persp.,95,29-34。  new window
12.Donbam, K. J.、Popendorf, W.、Palmgren, U.、Larsson, L.(1986)。Characterization of Dusts Collected from Swine Confinement Buildings。Am. I Ind. Med.,10,294-297。  new window
13.Elliott, L. F.、McCalla, T. M.、Deshazer, J. A.(1976)。Bacteria in the Air of Housed Swine Units。App. Environ. Microbiol.,32(2),270-273。  new window
14.Clark, S.、Rylander, R.、Larsson, L.(1983)。Airborne Bacteria, Endotoxin and Fungi in Dust in Poultry and Swine Confinement Buildings。Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.,44(7),537-541。  new window
15.Attwood, P.、Versloot, P.、Heederik, D.、Wit, R.、Boleij, J. S. M.(1986)。Assessment of Dust and Endotoxin Levels in the Working Environment of Dutch Pig Farmers: A Preliminary Study。Ann. Occup. Hyg.,30(2),201-208。  new window
16.Jacobs, R. R.(1989)。Airborne Endotoxins: An Association with Occupational Lung Disease。Appl. Ind. Hyg.,4(2),50-56。  new window
17.Donham, K. J.、Gustafson, K. E.(1982)。Human Occupational Hazards from Swine Confinement。Ann. Am. Conf. Gov. Ind. Hyg.,2,131-142。  new window
18.Mutel, C.、Donham, K. J.(1990)。Dust and Gases Affect the Respiratory Tract。Pigs,6(2),22-24。  new window
19.Donham, K.、Rubino, M.、Thedell, T. D.、Kammermeyer, J.(1977)。Potential Health Hazards to Agricultural Workers in Swine Confinement Buildings。J. Occup. Med.,19(6),383-387。  new window
20.Zejda, J. E.、Barber, E.、Dosman, J. A.、Olenchock, S. A.、McDuffie, H. H.、Rhodes, C.、Hurst, T.(1994)。Respiratory Health Status in Swine Producers Relates to Endotoxin Exposure in the Presence of Low Dust Levels。J. Occup. Med.,36(1),49-56。  new window
21.Cormier, Y.、Tremblay, G.、Meriaux, A.、Brochu, G.、Lavoie, J.(1990)。Airborne Microbial Contents in two Types of Swine Confinement Buildings in Quebec。Aw. Ind. Hyg, Assoc. J.,51(6),304-309。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(1992)。中華民國七十九年臺閩地區農林漁牧業普查報告:第3-3卷:農牧場報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.臺糖公司畜產研究所(1994)。養豬技術專輯。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣區雜糧發展基金會(1992)。畜牧污染防治。臺北市:財團法人臺灣區雜糧發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣區雜糧發展基金會(1982)。養豬場廢污處理方法輯要。臺北市:財團法人臺灣區雜糧發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所(1995)。臺北勞工作業環境生物性氣膠之危害研究(II):細菌內毒素分析方法之確立與評估。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE