:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以教與學歷程檔案評量STS教師的專業能力及其成長
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:王澄霞謝昭賢
作者(外文):Wang, Cheng-hsiaHsieh, Chao-hsien
出版日期:1997
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁137-165
主題關鍵詞:評量基準教與學歷程檔案STS教師AssessmentCriteriaPortfolioSTS teacher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:44
     本研究的目的為開發一種以教與學歷程檔案評量教師成長之方法。在此實作評量方法,教師需根據STS教師實作基準,蒐集具有一致性的證據,以證明自己符合約定基準;只作一次實作評量是不適當的。 主要研究者(師資培育者)設定教與學歷程檔案之目的,即檔案必需提供教師成長歷程中之變化,和具有專業能力之證據,主要研究員又開發一套STS教師實作基準、檔案樣式及評量指引,供教師參考之用,使教師易於記錄,並使教師與教師培育者了解,應達到的實作基準。著者開發的指引清楚地敘述,使教師能以此標準做為反省,比較自己的專業成長之依據。 個案教師從實際教學中蒐符合約定基準之證據,用來建立教與學歷程檔案,以便顯示其專業能力及其教師成長歷程中之變化。個案教師選擇第一、第二、第三等最佳證據加入檔案,並討論每一證據附加什麼。此冬加價值法促使教師自我評量、同儕評量,並建立自信,促使樂意自動自學。 本研究發現,檔案平量方法能評量STS教師的專業能力及其成長,改進教與學,並促進其專業發展。
     The purpose of this study was to develop a portfolio assessment method specific to STS teaching. In this study, the principal researcher set out the purposes of the portfolio and the evidence needed to show changes in professional competence across the program of teacher development. The principal researcher also developed a set of performance criteria, sample forms, record-keeping strategies, and rubrics for teachers and teacher educators to used. The developed rubrics contain explicit guidelines for teachers to reflect and compare on their own progress against clearly understood standards. To meet the stipulated criteria, the case teacher must decide what to collect from real teaching as pieces of evidence to build his/her portfolio. This value-added method motivates teachers to assess themselves and their peers, while building self-confidence and willingness to take charge of their own learning. The results of this study show the portfolio assessment method can be used to identify qualified STS teachers, improved instruction and learning, and stimulate professional development, and that the assessment can be a part of STS teacher certification.
期刊論文
1.Butterfield, E. C.、Nelson, G. D.(1989)。Theory and practice of teaching for transfer。Eductioanl Technology Research and Development,37(3),5-38。  new window
2.張惠博(19960300)。職前科學教師學科教學知識發展之研究。科學教育學刊,4(1),59-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王澄霞(19960600)。化學領域之STS師資培育課程架構。化學,54(2),103-114。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gunstone, R. F.、Slattery, M.、Baird, J. R.、Northfield, J. R.(1993)。A case study exploration of development in preservice science teachers。Science Education,77(1),47-73。  new window
5.Pedretti, E.、Hodson, D.(1995)。From Rhetoric to Action-Implementing STS Education through Action Reeseaarch。J. of Research in Science Teaching,32,463-486。  new window
6.Ambach, G.(199611)。Standards for Teachers: Potential for Improving Practice。Phi Delta Kappan,78(3),207-210。  new window
7.Adamchik, C. F.(1996)。The Design and Assessment of Chemistry Portfolios。Journal of Chemical Education,73,528-531。  new window
8.Baker, E. L.、O'Neil, H. F.、Linn, R. L.(1993)。Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment。American Psychologist,48,1210-1218。  new window
9.王澄霞(19970300)。STS教師的專業成長。科學教育學刊,5(1),23-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Collins, A.(1992)。Portfolios: Questions for design。Science Scope,15(6),25-27。  new window
11.Cheek, W. C.(1992)。Evaluting Learning in STS Education。Theory into Practice,31(1),64-71。  new window
12.Barton, J.、Collins, A.(1993)。Portfolios in teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education,44(3),200-210。  new window
13.Collions, A.(1992)。Portfolios for science education: Issues in purpose, structure, and authenticity。Science education,76(4),451-463。  new window
14.Herman, J. L.、Gearhart, M. G.、Baker, E. L.(1993)。Assessing Writing Portfolios: Issues in the Validity and Meaning of Scores。Educational Assessment,1,201-224。  new window
15.Heath, P. A.(1992)。Organizing for STS Teaching and Learning: The doing of STS。Theory into Practice,31(1)。  new window
16.Pope, M.、Gilbert, J.(1983)。Personal experience and the construction of knowledge in sciences。Science Education,67(2),193-203。  new window
17.Swanson, D. B.、Norman, G. R.、Linn, R. L.(1995)。Performance Based Assessmeent: Lessons form the health professions。Educational Researcher,24(5),5-11。  new window
18.Nott, L.、Reeve, C.、Reeve, R.(199203)。Scoring Rubrics: An Assessment Option。Science Scope,15(6),44-45。  new window
19.Hart, E. P.、Robottom, I. M.(1990)。The science-technology-society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process。Journal of research in science teaching,27(6),575-588。  new window
20.McLellan, Hilary(1993)。Evaluation in a Situated Learning Environment。Educational Technology,33(3),39-45。  new window
會議論文
1.王澄霞、謝昭賢(1997)。STS教師教與學歷程檔案之設計及應用。中華民國STS科學教育研討會,(會議日期: 1997/05/04-05/05)。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澄霞、謝昭賢(1996)。以提問及畫認知圖促進STS學習:酸雨。中華民國第12屆科學教育研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王澄霞(1996)。建立STS教師專業能力基準:化學領域 (計畫編號:NCS84-2511-S-003-094)。  延伸查詢new window
2.王澄霞(1994)。設計大學STS化學通識教育的架構 (計畫編號:NSC-83-0111-S-003-013)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, A.、Brown, J. S.、Newman, S. E.(1990)。Congitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics。Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Yager, R. E.(1992)。The constructivist learning model: A must for STS classrooms。ICASE yearbook: The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world。Hong Kong:International Council of Associations for Science Education。  new window
3.Wilson, S. M.、Shulman, L. S.、Richert, A. E.(1987)。150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching。Exploring teachers thinking。Cassell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE