:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會工作研究方法之本質與教學方針
書刊名:東吳社會工作學報
作者:高迪理 引用關係
作者(外文):Kao, Daniel Ti-li
出版日期:1998
卷期:4
頁次:頁123-145
主題關鍵詞:社會工作研究課程教學Social work reasearchCourse instruction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:86
     社會工作是一門兼具藝術和科學的服務專業以及科學領域,因此社會工作 的知識理論應能引導並建基於實務工作的內涵。研究不但是建立專業知識體系 的方法之一,也是社會工作專業講求服務績效的不二法門。探討研究與實務工作的交互影響關係,一直是社會工作專業,包括學術教育者和實務工作者所共 同專注的議題。一般而言,在所有的社會作專業教育課程內容中,學生對研究方法的學習 最感困擾,甚至在畢業後從事實際的服務工作也很少利用、參與研究。本文試 圖明述如何將社會工作研究方法的特質藉由設計、教學的過程中深植於學生的思考體系;同時培養學生具備適當的研究能力,使其能夠在未來將研究的概念 及技術融入實務工作當中,進而提昇社會工服務的品質和成效。
     Besides a profession, social work is also a discipline, featured with both art form and scientific thinking. Theoretical frameworks for social work not only can guide practice, but also should be grounded from practice. Knowledge-building requires accumulation of on-going research findings. For social work profession, conducting research is an important mechanism for accountability. Recently, the issue of integrating practice and research has gained much attention by educators and practitioners. Generally speaking, social work research method is the course that students dislike the most, even after their graduation, practitioners have shown a low degree of research utilization and participation. In this paper, attributes of social work research were presented, and were served as a framework in guiding course design and teaching. This paper argued that through the emphasis of integrating practice and research, students' capability in understanding and conducting practice-related research can be improved, any quality and effectiveness of practice will also be enhanced in the future.
期刊論文
1.高迪理、趙善如(19920600)。從「社區發展季刊」研究報告的分析談社會工作研究的趨勢。社會工作學刊,2,1-24。  延伸查詢new window
2.Beckerman, A. H.(1978)。Differentiating social research and social work research: Implications for teaching。Journal of Education for Social Work,14(2),9-15。  new window
3.Fortune, A. E.(1982)。Teaching students to integrate research concepts and field performance standards。Journal of Education for Social Work,18(1),5-13。  new window
4.Grinnell, R. M., Jr.、Kyte, N. S.(1977)。A model for bridging the gap between undergraduate research and practice。Journal of Education for Social Work,13(3),30-36。  new window
5.Kirk, S. A.、Kolevzon, M. S.(1978)。Teaching research methodology from Z to A。Journal of Education for Social Work,14(1),66-72。  new window
6.Kraybill, D.、Iacono-Harris, D.、Basom, R.(1982)。Teaching social work research: A consumer's approach。Journal of Education for Social Work,18(3),55-61。  new window
7.Lawson, T. R.、Berleman, W. C.(1982)。Research in the undergraduate curriculum: A survey。Journal of Education for Social Work,18(1),86-93。  new window
8.Rabin, C.(1985)。Matching the research seminar to meet practice needs: A method for integrating research and practice。Journal of Social Work Education,21(1),5-12。  new window
9.Reinberz, H.、Regan, J. M.、Anastas, J. W.(1983)。A research curriculum for future clinicians: A multimodel strategy。Journal of Education for Social Work,19(2),35-41。  new window
10.Rubin, A.、Franklin, C.、Selber, K.(1992)。Integrating research and practice into an interviewing skills project: An evaluation。Journal of Social Work Education,21(1),5-12。  new window
11.Seidl, F. W.(1973)。Teaching social work research: A study in teaching method。Journal of Education for Social Work,9(3),71-77。  new window
12.Siegel, D. H.(1983)。Can research and practice be integrated in social work education?。Journal of Education for Social Work,19(3),12-19。  new window
13.Strobino, J.(1997)。Integrating research and practice: Using classroom evaluations to introduce and concepts and methods of practice evaluation。Aretê,22(1),14-24。  new window
會議論文
1.Flexner, A.(1915)。Is social work a profession?。The National Conference of Charities and Correction,(會議日期: May 12-19, 1915)。Chicago:Hildman Printing Co。576-590。  new window
2.高迪理(1990)。大學生專業社會工作社會化之探究:以東海大學社會工作學系為例。第一屆東海大學社會工作學系師生論文發表會,東海大學 (會議日期: 78年9月28日)。  延伸查詢new window
3.高迪理、尤幸玲(1996)。需求之概念與測量:以老年人之需求為例。第六屆東海大學社會工作學系師生論文發表會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.高迪理(1995)。臺灣地區老年人社會福利服務需求之後設分析 (計畫編號:NSC82-0301-H029-019)。臺北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.趙善如(1992)。社會工作實務者運用研究之情形(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hess, P. M.、Mullen, E. J.(1995)。Practitioner-researcher partnerships: Building knowledge from, in, and for practice。Washington, DC:NASW Press。  new window
2.Isaac, S.、Michael, W. B.(1981)。Handbook in research and evaluation。San Diego, CA:EdlTS。  new window
3.Jordan, C.、Franklin, C.(1995)。Clinical assessment for social workers: Quantitative and qualitative methods。Chicago, IL:Lyceum Books。  new window
4.Powers, G. T.、Meenaghan, T. M.、Toomey, B. G.(1985)。Practice focused research: Integrating human service practice and research。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc。  new window
5.Richmond, M.(1917)。Social diagnosis。New York:Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
6.Rubin, A.、Babbie, E.(1997)。Research methods for social workers。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
7.Thomas, E. J.(1967)。Behavioral science for social workers。New York:Free Press。  new window
8.Tutty, L. M.、Rothery, M. A.、Grinnell, R. M. Jr.(1996)。Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
9.Weinbach, R. W.、Rubin, A.(1980)。Teaching social work research: Alternative programs and strategies。New York:CSWE。  new window
10.Williams, M.、Tutty, L. M.、Grinnell, R. M., Jr.(1995)。Research in social work: An introduction。Itasca, IL:F.E. Peacock。  new window
11.Creswell, J. W.(1994)。Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
12.Neuman, William Lawrence(1997)。Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches。Allen & Unwin。  new window
圖書論文
1.Reid, W. J.(1987)。Research in social work。Encyclopedia of social work。Silver Spring, MD:NASW。  new window
2.Reid, W. J.(1995)。Research overview。Encyclopedia of social work。Washington, DC:NASW。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top