An Appraisal of Faculty's Service Performance in Higher Education__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	An Appraisal of Faculty's Service Performance in Higher Education
書刊名：	國立臺灣體育學院學報
作者：	程春美
作者(外文)：	Cheng, Chun-mei
出版日期：	1998
卷期：	3(上)
頁次：	頁223-264
主題關鍵詞：	高等教育；教師；評鑑
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:11

　　　　　本研究問卷在調查臺灣高等教育學校對於公私立及類別不同學校是否採用評鑑標準評估老師校內外服務表現，以及探究其使用程度，並以問卷調查方式探究其差異性，研究結果可作為提升對當前高等教育學校老師表現評估的瞭解，進而作為學校老師升等之重要參考依據。本研究採用SPSS軟體進行各項統計分析工作，所有的數據資料以ANOVA進行變異分析。研究結果顯示校內服務表現評估以服務校系之行政工作為最主要評鑑標準，而校外（社區）服務表現評估則以提供各種訓練及研習活動為最主要評鑑標準。此外，研究結果顯示私立學院（M=29.85）比國立學院（M=27.74）較常採用評鑑標準來評估老師的校內服務表現，而私立學院（M=12.08）則比私立大學（M=10.72）較常採用評鑑標準來評估老師的校外（社區）服務表現。

以文找文

　　　　　This study surveyed four-year colleges and universities in Taiwan to determine if the criteria used to evaluate faculty performance in service based on the control and classification levels of institution. The finding results may be utilized to enhance the reader's knowledge of current faculty's service performance evaluation and relative to faculty promotion and salary. In this paper, the SPSS statistic software was utilized for data analysis. ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) was conducted to examine total ratings for individual items. Analysis of the results indicated that college service performance was based primarily on department administrative duties and public service performance was based primarily on conducting training. Besides, the criteria used to evaluate college service performance ranked higher among private four-year colleges (M=29.85), and lower among public four-year colleges (M=27.74). The criteria used to evaluate community service performance ranked higher among private four-year colleges (M=12.08), and ranked lower among private four-year universities (M=10.72).

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Miller, A. C.、Serzan, S. L.(1984)。Criteria for identifying a refereed journal。Journal of Higher Education，55，673-699。
2.	Austin, A. W.、Lee, C. B. T.(1966)。Current Practices in the evaluation and training of college teachers。Educational Record，47，361-365。
3.	Gustad, J. W.(1961)。Policies and practices in faculty evaluation。Educational Record，42(3)，194-211。
4.	Begin, J. P.、Lee, B. A.(1985)。Collective bargaining in higher education: A look ahead。The Journal of The College and University Personnel Association，36(2)，6-14。
5.	Bennett, J. B.(1990)。Editor's note。The Department Advisor，5(4)，1。
6.	Boice, R.(1989)。How chairs deal with faculty's teaching evaluations。The Department Advisor，4(3)，5-6。
7.	Bowers, J. K.(198912)。Issues in developing a faculty evaluation system。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，3(1)，31-38。
8.	Centra, J. A.(1990)。Evaluating college teaching: Some reflections。The Department Advisor，5(4)，1-5。
9.	Cohen, P. A.(1980)。Using student rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings。Research in Higher Education，13，321-341。
10.	Euster, G. L.、Weinback, R. W.(1986)。Dean's quality assessment of faculty publications for tenure/promotio decisions。Journal of Social Work Education，3，79-84。
11.	Hofman, J. E.、Kremer, L.(1980)。Attitudes toward higher education and course evaluation。Journal of Educational Psychology，72，610-617。
12.	Seldin, P.(1989)。How colleges evaluate professors: 1988 vs. 1983。AAHE Bulletin，3-7。
13.	Winkler, A. M.(1992)。The faculty workload question。Change，24(4)，36-41。
14.	McKeachie, W. J.(1979)。Student ratings of faculty: A reprise。Academe，65，384-397。
15.	Feldman, K. A.(1989)。Instructional Effectiveness of College Teachers as Judged by Teachers Themselves, Current and Former Students, Colleagues, Administrators, and External (Neutral) Observers。Research in Higher Education，30(2)，137-191。
16.	Jauch, L. R.(1976)。Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation。Research in Higher Education，5(1)，1-13。

會議論文
1.	McLean, J. E.(1987)。A useful university departmental evaluation。The Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association。Boston。

研究報告
1.	Centra, J. A.(1977)。How universities evaluate faculty performance: A survey of department heads。Princeton, NJ：Educational Testing Service。

學位論文
1.	Traylor, C. F.(1992)。A comparative analysis of selected criteria used in four-year colleges and universities to evaluate teaching, scholarship, service, and faculty overall performance(博士論文)。Ohio University。
2.	Zitolw, E. M.(1988)。Faculty evaluation procedures used in two-year postsecondary educational institutions(博士論文)。Ohio University。

圖書
1.	Miller, R. I.(1972)。Evaluating faculty performance。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publisher。
2.	Miller, R. I.(1979)。The assessment of college performance: A handbook of techniques and measures for institutional self-evaluation。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
3.	Miller, R. I.(1987)。Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
4.	Miller, R. I.(1974)。Developing programs for faculty evaluation: A sourcebook for higher education。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
5.	Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1981)。Effective evaluation。San Francisco：Jossey Bass。
6.	Applegate, M.(1981)。Faculty evaluation in higher education。New York, NY：National League for Nursing。
7.	Bennett, J. B.、Peltason, J. W.(1985)。Contemporary issues in higher education。New York：Macmillan Publishing。
8.	Centr, J. A.、Froh, R. C.、Gray, P. J.、Lamber, L. M.、Diamond, R.(1987)。A guide to evaluating teaching for promotion and tenure。Copley Publishing Group。
9.	Chen, C. F.(1993)。Research on higher education。Taipei：Normal University。
10.	Clark, M. J.(1983)。Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。
11.	Creal, R. C.、Miller, J. P.、Toller, J. M.(1987)。Administrative compensation survey。Washington, D.C.：College and University Personnel Association。
12.	Elman, S. E.、Smock, S. M.(1985)。Professional Service and faculty rewards: Toward an integrated structure。Washington, DC：National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges。
13.	Goodwin, H. I.、Smith, E. R.(1985)。Faculty and administrator evaluation: Constructing the instruments。Morgantown, WV：West Virginia University Printing Services。
14.	Haves, G. R.、Haves, L. S.(1982)。The concise dictionary of education。New York：Van Nostrand Reinhold company。
15.	Hillestad, M.(1977)。Research: Process and product。Columbus, OH：The Ohio State University, Delta Pi Epsilon。
16.	Hodgkinson, H. L.(1971)。Institutions in transition: A profile of change in higher education。New York：McGraw Hill。
17.	Hodgkinson, H. L.、Hurst, J.、Levine, H.(1975)。Improving and assessing performance: Evaluation in higher education。Berkeley, CA：Center for Research and Development in Higher Education。
18.	Lewis, J., Jr.(1973)。Appraising teaching performance。Nyack, NY：West Parker Publishing Company, Inc.。
19.	Long, T.、Convey, J.、Chwale, A.(1985)。Completing dissertations in the behavioral sciences and education。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
20.	Lynton, E. A.、Elman, S. E.(1987)。New priorities for the university。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
21.	Outcalt, D. L.(1980)。Report of the task force on teaching evaluation。Berkely：University of California Press。
22.	Peterson, D. R.、Fishman, D. B.(1987)。Assessment for decision。New Brunswick, NJ：Rutgers University Press。
23.	Rees, A.、Smith, S. P.(1991)。Faculty retirement in the arts and sciences。Princeton, N. J.：Princeton University Press。
24.	Seldin, P.(1980)。Successful faculty evaluation programs: A guide to improve faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions。Crugers, NY：Coventry。
25.	Seldin, P.(1984)。Changing practices in faculty in faculty evaluation。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
26.	(1988)。Toward the third century: Issues and choices for Ohio University。Athens, OH：Ohio University Publications。
27.	Bowen, H. R.、Schuster, J. H.(1986)。American professors: A national resource imperiled。New York：Oxford University Press。
28.	Braskapm, L.、Brandenburg, D.、Ory, J.(1984)。Evaluating teaching effectiveness。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage Publications。
29.	Centra, J. A.(1979)。Determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
30.	Dressel, Paul L.(1976)。Handbook of academic evaluation。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。
31.	Genova, W. J.、Madoff, M. K.、Chin, R.、Thomas, G. B.(1976)。Mutual benefit evaluation of faculty and administrators in higher education。Cambridge, MA：Ballinger Publishing Company。
32.	Millman, J.(1981)。Handbook of Teacher Evaluation。Sage Publications。
33.	Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。

單篇論文
1.	Dottin, E. S.(1987)。Faculty evaluation: Toward a humanistic model for appraising performance，San Diego：University of California。(ED 290734)。

圖書論文
1.	Arreola, R. A.(1983)。Establighing successful faculty evaluation and development programs。Evaluating faculty and staff: New directions for community colleges。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。
2.	Astin, A. W.、Lee, C. B. T.(1966)。Current Practices in the evaluation and training of college teachers。Improving college teaching。Washington, D.C.：American Council on Education。
3.	Astin, A. W.、Lee, C. B. T.(1967)。Current Practices in the evaluation and training of college teachers。Improving college teaching。Washington, DC：American Council on Education。
4.	Baldridge, J. V.(198504)。A faculty perspective on achieving excellence: Faculty unionism and increased collegiality。Unionization and academic excellenc。New York：National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professionals。
5.	Cheydleur, F. D.(194508)。Criteria of effective teaching in basic French courses at the University of Wisconsin。Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin。Madison, WI：University of Wisconsin。
6.	Evertson, C. M.、Holley, F. M.(1981)。Classroom observation。Handbook of teacher evaluation。Beverly Hills：Sage Publications。
7.	Gustad, J. W.(1967)。Evaluation of teaching performance: Issues and possibilities。Improving college teaching。Washington, DC：American Council on Education。
8.	MeReynolds, P.(1975)。Historical antecedents of personality assessment。Advances in psychological assessment。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
9.	Millman, J.(1984)。[Handbook of teacher evaluation] Introduction。Handbook of teacher evaluation。Beverly Hills：Sage Publications。
10.	Stecklein, J. E.(1974)。Approaches to measuring workload over the past two decades。New directions for higher education: Assessing faculty effort。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。
11.	Stroup, K. M.(1983)。Faculty evaluation。New directions for higher education: Issues in faculty personnel policies。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	A Personal View of the Evaluation of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Higher Educaion
2.	高等教育品質保證制度--英、美、澳、芬蘭及丹麥五國之分析和啟示
3.	歐洲高等教育區高等教育品質保證機制之探討
4.	日本におけゐ教員勤務評定の成立と展開に関すゐ一考察
5.	教師評鑑模式之研究
6.	S-P 表分析理論(Student-Problem Chart Analysis Theory) 及其在學習評鑑上教師命題技術改進態度的效用之探究
7.	教師評分標準的高低對學生學習行為的影響:學習結果的評鑑及回饋之分析研究

無相關博士論文

1.	高等教育評鑑 : 理論與實際
2.	工作內涵與性別角色
3.	體育教師專業評鑑指標

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫