資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.59.37.10)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Consecrating the Buddha: Legend, Lore, and History of the Imperial Relic-Veneration Ritual in the T'ang Dynasty
書刊名:
中華佛學學報
作者:
黃啟江
作者(外文):
Huang, Chi-chiang
出版日期:
1998
卷期:
11
頁次:
頁483-533
主題關鍵詞:
佛舍利
;
歷史化
;
迷思歷史
;
準歷史性
;
道宣
;
劉薩何故事
;
佛指骨
;
法門寺
;
Relics
;
Logos and mythos
;
Mythistory
;
King Asoka
;
Liu Sa-he
;
Fa-men ssu
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:27
本文旨在處理中國佛教史上一相當重要且耐人尋味之課題-佛的生身舍利及帝王禮 拜舍利之現象。文中敘述自魏晉至唐代以來,帝王在宮殿裡所舉行的奉迎舍利儀式,並以唐高 宗(r.650~683)、武后(r.690~704)肅宗(r.756~761)、德宗(r.779~804)、憲宗(r.805~819) 及懿宗、(r.859~870)等皇帝之尊禮舍利為焦點,分析各朝禮拜舍利之可能因素。本文雖大致 同意歷史文獻對奉迎佛舍利之描述,但要提醒讀者注意此禮拜儀式的歷史背景,了解人為的、 刻意塑造成的「傳統」對佛舍利之存在及此儀式產生的作用。文中揭示各個歷史階段裡,史家 與佛教學者有意無意地捲入塑造成「歷史化」佛舍利及其奉迎之過程,而使其成為一歷史傳 統。此塑造過程,表現於正史及佛教著作裡結合傳說、民俗、與史實而成之歷史敘述。此類歷 史敘述多為近代史家作為撰寫佛教歷史之依據;而此一結合之結果,實類似歷史事實與虛構故 事之混合體,為某些西方史家所謂的「迷思歷史」(mythistory)。 本文大致分成七節。首先略述正史及佛教著作中有關佛舍利與帝王之關聯,說明多數記錄都稱 傳說中阿育王佛舍利之神異性。其神蹟吸引唐以前不少皇帝與親王。這些記載都認定佛舍利 之神奇及其改變人們信仰之效用,顯示他們受到民俗裡有關佛舍利說法之影響。為了說明此點, 本文之第二節集中討論民俗觀裡的佛舍利如何轉化成歷史性或「準歷史性」 (quasi-historcial)之敘述,採名僧道宣(596~667)之著作為範例,說明此一變化之複雜過 程。並將道宣著作中有關劉薩何及其發現佛舍利之故事,置於帝王迎拜、瞻仰佛舍利之脈絡中 詳加討論。 本文第三節專論帝王奉禮迎、尊禮佛舍利之詳情,舉出兩種禮拜佛舍利之傳統:拜佛牙及拜佛 指骨。本節根據道宣著作所提供之資料,及1987年在陝西法門寺所挖掘之碑銘,認為唐以前可 能已形成上述兩種禮拜佛舍利的傳統。其中禮拜佛指骨在唐代躍為最盛行之傳統。第四節專 論此一傳統,說明高宗至德宗以來諸帝為何並如何表達他們指骨之敬仰,及舉行迎拜佛指骨之 儀式。這些皇帝大致因健康不佳、政治不穩、軍事不利,等各種原因,警覺其王權之削弱,發現 奉佛之重要,而欲以奉迎佛骨之儀式來幫助鞏固、安定其為人主之威權。 第五節指出唐代帝王迎拜佛指骨舍利一事為史家寫成戲劇化之篇章。尤其憲宗與懿宗之奉迎 佛指骨至京,皇帝之私下禮拜等過程,莊嚴隆重,耗費巨大,而百姓沿途瞻仰,頂禮膜拜,燒頂灼 臂,如痴如狂,正史之記載,彰彰在目。本節指出正史作者似認定此佛教指骨亦為所謂的阿育王 佛舍利之部份,而特別渲染憲宗、懿宗兩朝奉迎佛骨事,使其顯得史無前例,隱晦了其與前代奉 佛及民俗的關聯。第六節即在討論此一落失之關聯,略述現代學者對發掘出之法門寺碑銘所作 的解釋。並指出其說法之優點及問題,懷疑學者將迎拜佛指骨之民俗說法歷史化的潛在意圖。 此節並質疑學者對佛骨年代與歸屬之斷定法及其對所謂的「靈骨」與「影骨」來源的解釋。 此「靈骨」與「影骨」為法門寺挖掘之七百餘種遺物之一,但「靈骨」之複製成「影骨」,仍 有問題尚未釐清。 本文結論重申傳說與民俗對歷史記載形成之影響,並提醒史家在遇到含史實及故事之史料而 難以分辨其虛實之時,應如何小心處理及運用這些史料。雖然本文承認重建可靠的佛舍利及奉 迎舍利之歷史,不無可能,但亦提出若干疑義,以供更進一步的研究及討論。
以文找文
This article deals with an important and intriguing aspect of the history of Buddhism in China-the Buddha's bodily relics and the imperial veneration of these relics. It discusses the relic-veneration ritual performed in the palaces of the imperial dynasties from the Wei-Chin period through the T'ang dynasty. Focusing on the ritual performed separately by Kao-tsung (r.650~683), Empress Wu (r.690~704) Su-tsung (r.756~761), Te-tsung (r.779~804), Hsien-tsung (r.805~819), and I-tsung (r.859~872), it analyzes possible reasons for the occurrence of each ritual. While acknowledging its existence, the article also calls readers' attention to how this ritual grew out of a created or invented tradition. It reveals the formation and the growth of the tradition as resulting from the creation or historicization undertaken, consciously or unconsciously, by historians and Buddhist scholars at different stages of China's imperial time. The process of this creation or historicization involved the fusion of legend, lore, and historical facts as evidenced by some accounts, including official histories and Buddhist works on the basis of which modern scholars write their historical works. The result of this fusion was the mixture of logos and mythos, a blending of historical facts and fictions, or what may be called "mythishtory." The subject in question is discussed under several headings, beginning with the documented relationship between the relics and imperial rulership culled from various secular and Buddhist accounts. All accounts point to the magical property of the legendary Asoka relics which fascinated a number of emperors, kings, and princes before the T'ang dynasty. These accounts recognize the theurgies associated with the relics and their proselytizing effect, thus reflecting the influence of their lore upon themselves. To elaborate this point, the second portion of this paper centers on the discussion of how the lore was transformed into a historical, or strictly speaking, a quasi-historical narrative. The works of Tao-hsuan, a renowned Buddhist writer, are used to exemplify the complicated process of this transformation. Tao-hsuan's story about Liu Sa-he and his finding of the relics at the Ch'ang-kan ssu is discussed in detail within the context of imperial veneration. The third section of this article takes note of imperial veneration of the relics which seemingly appeared in two major traditions: the veneration of the Buddha's tooth and the veneration of finger bone. Based on the information provided by Tao-hsuan and the inscription unearthed in 1987 at the Fa-men ssu, this section suggests the possibility that two relic-veneration traditions existed in pre-T'ang times. It points out that the finger bone tradition was made prominent and became the dominant tradition in the T'ang. The fourth section takes up this theme and demonstrates how and why T'ang emperors from Kao-tsung to Te-tsung showed their veneration of the finger-bone relic and performed the relic-veneration ritual. It argues that they used this ritual to help solidify their authority whenever they found it had diminished because of weakening health, political instability, military failure, and so forth. Imperial veneration of the finger-bone relic was written into dramatic episodes in the T'ang history, as is discussed in the fifth section. Based primarily on official historical accounts, this section discusses the sumptuous reception, display, and imperial observance of the relic which occurred during the reigns of Hsien-tsung and I-tsung. It also suggests that official histories, which seem to recognize the finger bone as a component of the so-called Asoka relics, made the rituals held in these two reigns look unprecedented, obscuring its possible historical link to earlier incidents. This missing link is discussed in the sixth section which introduces modern scholars' interpretations of the unearthed inscriptions, pointing out the merits and problems of their interpretations which show an attempt to historicize the notion of imperial veneration of the finger-bone relic provided by the lore. It questions the dating method and asks for a more tenable explanation of the appearance of one piece of so-called "holy bone" and three grains of so-called "duplicate bones" discovered among some seven hundred excavated objects. The concluding section rection recapitulates the theme of legend and lore at work in the formation of historical accounts. It raises questions as to how a historian can better use sources which contain fiction and facts when one may have difficulty drawing a clear-cut line between them. While arguing the possibility of reconstructing, or as a matter of fact, constructing the intriguing history of the Buddha's relics and relic-veneration ritual, the article also poses questions and delineates some problems of this task in hopes of furthering investigation of issues relevant to the subject.
以文找文
圖書
1.
錢仲聯(1975)。韓昌黎詩繫年集釋。韓昌黎詩繫年集釋。臺北。
延伸查詢
2.
李延壽(1973)。南史。中華書局。
延伸查詢
3.
Chen, Kenneth(1963)。Buddhism in China。Princeton。
4.
Reischauer, Edwin O.(1955)。Ennin’s travels in T’ang China。New York。
5.
Strong, John S.(1983)。The Legend of King A'soka。Princeton。
6.
劉昫。舊唐書。商務印書館。
延伸查詢
7.
Wechsler, Howard J.(1985)。Offerings of jade and silk:ritual and symbol in the legitimation of the T'ang Dynasty。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。
8.
釋志磐。佛祖統記。
延伸查詢
9.
韓愈、馬其昶(1975)。韓昌黎集。河洛圖書出版社。
延伸查詢
10.
道宣。集神州三寶感通錄。
延伸查詢
11.
釋贊寧、范祥雍(1987)。宋高僧傳。中華書局。
延伸查詢
12.
姚察、姚思廉(1973)。梁書。北京:中華書局。
延伸查詢
13.
釋慧皎、釋僧詮、湯用彤、湯一玄(1992)。高僧傳。北京:中華書局。
延伸查詢
14.
資治通鑑。資治通鑑。
延伸查詢
15.
陳書。陳書。
延伸查詢
16.
陳全方(1989)。法門寺與佛教。法門寺與佛教。臺北。
延伸查詢
17.
Faure, Bernard(1996)。Visions of power: imaging medieval Japanese Buddhism。Visions of power: imaging medieval Japanese Buddhism。Princeton。
18.
(唐)釋道宣。廣弘明集。廣弘明集。
延伸查詢
19.
魏書。魏書。
延伸查詢
20.
Wright, Arthur F.(1990)。Fu-tu-teng: A Biography。Studies in Chinese Buddhism。New Haven/London。
21.
(新羅)崔致遠(1983)。唐大薦福寺故寺主翻經大德法藏和尚傳。中國佛教思想資料選編(第2卷第2冊)。北京。
延伸查詢
22.
Peterson, Charles A.(1973)。The Restoration Completed: Hsien-tsung and the Provinces。Perspective on the T'ang。New Haven。
23.
唐會要。唐會要。
延伸查詢
24.
McNeill, William H.(1986)。Mythistory, or Truth, Myth, Historians。Mythistory and Other Essays。Chicago/London。
25.
Schafer, Edward(1985)。Golden Peaches of Samarkand。Golden Peaches of Samarkand。Berkeley。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
晉唐時期寧波阿育王寺的創建與發展
2.
泗州大聖僧伽傳奇新論--宋代佛教居士與僧伽崇拜
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
Miracle Tales and the Domestication of Kuan-yin
2.
Tangut Chan Buddhism and Guifeng Zong-mi
3.
「人間佛教」的遠見與願景--佛教與社會福利的對話
4.
正法與三十七菩提分法的實踐
5.
道安避難行狀考
6.
對《妙法蓮華經玄義研究》的看法
7.
解讀「比丘尼」在西方人眼中的隱含
8.
古典西藏語文法簡介暨佛典解讀實例--蓮花戒阿闍黎「入修瑜伽」
9.
漢月法藏之禪法研究
10.
日本曹洞宗與臺灣佛教僧侶的互動
11.
四至六世紀中亞天山南麓的華嚴義學與盧舍那造像
12.
瑜伽菩薩戒本之心理與倫理觀
13.
中國佛教建築--佛教建築設計發展國際研討會主題演講
14.
戒律與人間淨土的建立
15.
佛教最初傳入吐蕃之探討
QR Code