:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由名學走向儒學之路--陳大齊對臺灣儒學的貢獻
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:沈清松
作者(外文):Shen, Vincent Tsing-song
出版日期:1998
卷期:16:2=32
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:臺灣儒學陳大齊名學因明德行倫理學Confucianism in TaiwanCh'en ta-chiLogicIndian logicEthics of virtue
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:206
  • 點閱點閱:92
     在臺灣當代名儒當中,陳大齊的學術思想在他本人過世之後較少受到討論。如此 的忽視會造成學界在援引前人學術資源、累積學術研究成果上的缺失。為了濟補缺漏,增益 研究資源,本文擬對陳大齊的學思之路與研究成果加以探討,使臺灣儒學史的研究更為完整 。 整體說來,陳大齊的學思之路,最初研究心理學與理則學,其後漸集中於理則學或名學,於 來臺之後轉往中國名學,最後則歸本於儒學研究。對理則學與名理的興趣貫穿他一生的學術 研究,並延伸到他對古典儒學的研究,使他的儒學研究更具論證性、分析性與嚴謹性,也因 此在當代儒學中具有不容忽視的地位。 誠如美國學者柯雄文( Antonio Cua )在其近著《 道德視野與傳統─中國倫理學論集》中所表示,「陳大齊的《孔子學說》是儒家倫理學概念 面向的先驅之作。」 本文為了闡明陳大齊由名學走向儒學,因而使儒學更具論證性、分析性與嚴謹性的學術道路 ,將首先簡述其生平與著作,明其一生與學術的重要轉折,進而為其學術思想發展分期;之 後再分就理則學、因明研究、古典儒學研究等三方面,討論陳大齊在學術思想方面的貢獻; 最後,再試圖提出作者對陳大齊整體學術成果的評價。
     The thought of Ch'en Ta-ch'i, though less discussed in Taiwan after his death due to the overwhelming influence of contemporary Neo-Confucian figure such as Mou Tzong-san, is significant for its logical and ethical approach to Confucianism, in contrast to Mou's transcendental and ontological approach. In the present paper, I attempt to reconstruct and evaluate the evolution and achievements of Ch'en's Confucian studies. As aptly put by Antonio Cua in his Moral Visions and Tradition--Esasays in Chinese Ethices, "The pioneering study of the conceptual aspects of Confucian ethics has been Ch'en Ta-ch'i's Kung Tzu hsuehshuo." Ch'en began his studies in psychology and logic at the beginning of the century, gradually making logical studies his main focus. On the basis of his training in logic, he first performed research on Indian logic, and then later extended his research to Chinese logic. After coming to Taiwan with the Central Government in 1948, Ch'en began to do research on the logical and conceptual aspects of Confucianism, starting with Hsun Tzu, and then tracing his way back to Confucius and Mencius. Through in-depth study of the basic concepts, ethical argumentation and ethics of virtue in Confucianism, Ch'en gained a profound understanding of Confucian ethics. Indeed, he can be considered a pioneer in these areas of research. After analyzing and evaluating Ch'en's research on logic, I conclude the paper by presenting an overall synthesis of his thought and intellectual achievements.
期刊論文
1.沈清松(19951100)。德行倫理學與儒家倫理思想的現代意義。哲學與文化,22(11)=258,975-992。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳大齊(1964)。孔子學說。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳大齊(1954)。荀子學說。臺北:中華文化出版事業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳大齊(1971)。平凡的道德觀。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Heidegger, Martin(1972)。Sein und Zeit。Max Niemeyer Verlag。  new window
5.陳大齊(1970)。因明入正理論悟他門淺釋。台北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.沈清松(19860000)。現代哲學論衡。臺北:黎明。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.柯雄文(1998)。Moral Visions and Tradition-Essays in Chinese Ethics。Moral Visions and Tradition-Essays in Chinese Ethics。Washington D. C.。  new window
8.陳大齊(1987)。八十二歲自述。陳百年先生文集(第1輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳大齊(1974)。因明大疏蠡測。因明大疏蠡測。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳大齊(1953)。實用理則學。實用理則學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳大齊(1994)。對比的用處。陳百年先生文集(第3輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳大齊(1957)。名理論叢。名理論叢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳大齊(1952)。印度理則學。印度理則學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳大齊(1987)。荀子的名學思想。陳百年先生文集(第1輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳大齊(1987)。孔子。陳百年先生文集(第1輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳大齊(1987)。孟子性善說與荀子性惡說的不相牴觸。陳百年先生文集(第1輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE