:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:農漁村社區更新計畫之績效評估--條件評價法之應用
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:李朝賢林妍儀
作者(外文):Lee, Chaur ShyanLin, Yen-yi
出版日期:1998
卷期:64
頁次:頁33-60
主題關鍵詞:農漁村社區更新計畫條件評價法Rural and fishery communitiesRenovation programsContingent valuation method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:134
     本研究使用條件評價法(contingent valuation method,CVM)來評估農漁村社 區更新計畫的執行績效。在實証分析上,本研究以雲林縣虎尾鎮竹圍子社區為例,使用條件 評價法中單界二分選擇模型, 以 probit 與 logit 模型分別加以估測,其實証結果頗為相 似。在模型中以每月支出金額,家庭人口數,居住時間,自有農地變更成建地坪數,以及社 會,經濟與環境面的平均滿意度等變數均顯著地影響受訪居民對社區更新效益的支付意願。 此一實証結果顯示,農漁村社區更新如能以社區居民的需求以及提昇社區居民生活品質為依 歸,則社區更新計畫的執行效益將更大。最後,本研究發現,在考慮投資貼現率下,虎尾鎮 竹圍子社區更新計畫效益的益本比為 1.1549, 顯示社區更新計畫帶給社區居民的效益大於 其建設投入的成本,農漁村社區更新計畫可繼續推動。
     This paper evaluates the renovation programs for rural and fishery communities in Zu-wei Community, Hu-wei Chen, Yun-lin Hsien by using contingent valuation method. From the aspect of empirical analysis, using the regressive coefficient and the significant value of single-bound dichotomous choice for the estimation in contingent valuation method, we find that the estimated results from probit model and logit model are almost the same. The factors affecting the willingness to pay for renovation programs in rural and fishery communities are the expenditures of family, the size of family, the time living in the community, the farm land changing to nonfarm use, and the level of satisfaction in social, economic and environmental conditions. Obviously, if we consider both the needs of rural people and the quality of life in rural communities, the benefits of renovation programs for rural and fishery communities then can be increased accordingly. The main conclusion is that the benefit cost ratio is 1.1549 by using the discount rate of 6.8%. This result indicates that the rural people can take benefits from the renovation programs for rural and fishery communities, thus it is really necessary to continue the renovation programs in rural areas.
期刊論文
1.羅凱安、羅紹麟(19970300)。環境規劃管理上保育野生動物資源效益之評估方法與實例。臺灣土地金融季刊,34(1)=131,115-134。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cameron, T. A.(1988)。A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,15,355-379。  new window
3.劉健哲(19941100)。農村社區更新的緣由及其目標與手段之探討。臺灣地政,105,5-12。  延伸查詢new window
4.陸雲(19900300)。環境資源估價之研究--非市場估價方法。經濟論文,18(1),93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bishop, Richard C.、Heberlein, Thomas A.(1979)。Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased?。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,61(5),926-930。  new window
6.吳珮瑛、謝雯華(19950500)。環境財需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊,1(1),1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hanemann, W. Michael(1984)。Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3),332-341。  new window
8.Cameron, Turdy Ann、Huppert, Daniel D.(1991)。Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values。Journal of the American Statistical Association,86(416),910-918。  new window
9.Cooper, Joseph、Loomis, Joh(1992)。Sensitivity of Willingness-to-pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Model。Land Economics,68(2),211-244。  new window
10.Hanemann, W. Michael(1989)。Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,71(4),1057-1061。  new window
11.Kling, Catherine L.(1997)。The Gains form Combining Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Data to Value Nonmarket Goods。Land Economics,73(3),428-439。  new window
12.Loomis, John B.(1989)。Test-Retest Reliability of the Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of General Population and Visitor Responses。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,71(1),76-84。  new window
13.McConnell, K. E.(1990)。Double counting in hedonic and travel cost models。Land Economics,66(2),121-127。  new window
14.Park, Timothy、Loomis, John B.、Creel, Michael D.(1991)。Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates form Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies。Land Economics,67(1),64-73。  new window
15.Randall, A.、Hoehn, J. P.、Brookshire, D. S.(1983)。Contingent Valuation Surveys for Evaluation Environment Assets。Natural Resources J.,23,635-648。  new window
16.Cameron, T. A.、James, M. D.(1987)。Efficient Estimation Methods for 'Closed-Ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys。The Review of Economics and Statistics,69(1),269-276。  new window
學位論文
1.Theil, Henri(1971)。Principles of Econometrics(博士論文)。Nebraska-Lincoln University。  new window
圖書
1.Griffiths, W. E., R. C. Hill, and G. G. Judge,(1993)。Learning and Practicing Econometrics。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
2.Cummings, Ronald G.、Brookshire, David S.、Schulze, William D.、Bishop, R. C.、Arrow, K. J.(1986)。Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method。Rowman and Allanheld Publishers。  new window
3.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
4.李朝賢、董時叡(1998)。改善農漁村社區環境計畫執行效益評估。改善農漁村社區環境計畫執行效益評估。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡仁位、沈順成(1997)。改善農漁村社區環境實施計畫執行成果評鑑報告。改善農漁村社區環境實施計畫執行成果評鑑報告。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE