民主政治與經濟均富：跨國實証的比較研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	民主政治與經濟均富：跨國實証的比較研究
書刊名：	東海學報
作者：	傅恆德
作者(外文)：	Fu, Hung-der
出版日期：	1998
卷期：	39:5(社會科學學院)
頁次：	頁97-118
主題關鍵詞：	民主政治；經濟均富；均富
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:11 點閱:28

　　　　　為瞭解民主政治對經濟成長和分配平均的關係，從民主政治的機制提出假設，並採跨國資料來分析檢驗其間的關連。結果發現民主政治與經濟成長無關，民主政治與分配平均有正向的關連。這樣的發現仍有待進一步的分析，以瞭解為何現今的民主政治，有較高水準的經濟發展和較為平均的分配。在本論文中，整合了經濟成長和分配平均的理論，提出均富的指標，從現代化理論、依賴理論、發展理論和國家的角色來探討民主政治和經濟發展的關係，除了以迴歸分析分別檢測各種理論所提出的假設外，並以整體模型來檢測民主政治對均富的影響。在控制其他現代化和結構性因素的變數後發現，老的民主政治與均富有正面的關係，新興的民主政治與均富沒有顯著的關係，而威權政體雖較為不均但並未有顯著較低的均富指數。

以文找文

　　　　　To understand the relationships between democracy on the one hand growth and equity on the other, cross-national data have been used to test against the hypotheses. The results show that there is no relationship between democracy and growth. A positive relationship has been found between democracy and income distribution. These results, however, are tentative and weak, to answer why modern democracies have enjoyed both higher standard of living and relatively egalitarian societies. In order to demonstrate how democracy affects economic performance, by collecting all available and reliable cross-national data, major theories referred to the subject have been test thoroughly. By integrating major schools of thoughts and using Human Development Index as a proxy to growth and equity, a refined model is constructed and tested. The results show that old democracies always relate to higher HDI, new democracies have insignificant relationship with HDI. Authoritarian nations, not necessarily correlate with lower HDI, have been relatively unequal in income distribution.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	郭承天、吳煥偉(19970900)。民主與經濟發展：結合質與量的研究方法。問題與研究，36(9)，75-98。延伸查詢
2.	Weede, E.(1982)。The Effects of Democracy and Socialist Strength on the Size Distribution of Income。International Journal of Comparative Sociology，23，151-165。
3.	Weede, E.(1984)。Political Democracy, State Strength and Economic Growth in LDCs: A Cross-National Analysis。Review of International Studies，10，297-312。
4.	Muller, Edward N.(1988)。Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality。American Sociological Review，53(1)，50-68。
5.	Huntington, Samuel P.(1984)。Will More Countries Become Democratic?。Political Science Quarterly，99(2)，193-218。
6.	Bollen, Kenneth A.、Grandjean, Burke D.(1981)。The Dimensions of Democracy: Further Issues in the Measurement and Effects of Political democracy。American Sociological Review，46，651-659。
7.	Bornschier, Volker(1983)。World Economy, Level of Development and Income Distribution: An Integration of Different Approaches to the Explanation of Income Inequality。World Development，11，11-20。
8.	Sawyer, Malcolm(1976)。Income distribution in OECD countries: OECD Economic Outlook。Occasional Studies，1976(Jul.)，3-36。
9.	Weede, Erich、Tiefenbach, H.(1981)。Some Recent Explanations of Income Inequality。International Studies Quarterly，25，255-282。
10.	Weede, Erich(1983)。The Impact of Democracy on Economic Growth: Some Evidence from Cross-National Analysis。Kyklos，36，21-39。
11.	Weede, Erich(1986)。Sectoral Reallocation, Distributional coalitions and the Welfare State as Determinants of Economic Growth Rates in Industrialized Democracies。European Journal of Political Research，14，501-519。
12.	Weede, Erich(1988)。Price Distortion, Democracy or Regime Repressiveness and Economic Growth Rates among LDCs, 1973-1983。Pacific Focus，3，23-39。
13.	Ahluwalia, Montek S.(1976)。Inequality, Poverty and Development。Journal of Development Economics，3(4)，307-342。
14.	Dos Santos, Theotonio(1970)。The Structure of Dependence。The American Economic Review，60(2)，231-236。
15.	Kuznets, Simon(1963)。Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations, VIII: The Distribution of Income by Size。Economic Development and Cultural Change，11(2)，1-80。
16.	Portes, Alejandro(1976)。On the Sociology of National Development: Theories and Issues。American Journal of Sociology，82，55-85。
17.	Marsh, Robert, M.(1979)。Does Democracy Hinder Economic Development in Latecomer Developing Nations?。Comparative Social Research，2，215-248。
18.	Paukert, Felix(19730800)。Income Distribution at Different Levels of Development: A Survey of Evidence。International Labour Review，108(2/3)，97-125。
19.	Tollison, Robert D.(1982)。Rent Seeking: A Survey。KYKLOS，35(4)，575-602。
20.	Lipset, Seymour Martin(1959)。Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy。The American Political Science Review，53(1)，69-105。
21.	Rustow, Dankwart A.(1970)。Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model。Comparative Politics，2(3)，337-363。
22.	Seligson, M. A.、Muller, E. N.(1987)。Inequality and insurgency。American political science review，81，425-449。
23.	Bollen, K. A.、Jackman, R. W.(1985)。Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income。American Sociological Review，50(4)，438-457。
24.	Hewitt, C.(1977)。The Effect of Political Democracy and Social Democracy on Equality in Industrial Societies: A Cross-National Comparison。American Sociological Review，42，450-464。

會議論文
1.	Whiteley, Paul(1986)。Political Incumbency, Policy Instruments and Economic Growth in the United States in the Long Run。The 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association，(會議日期: 1986/08/28-08/31)。Washington, D. C.。

圖書
1.	Chirot, Daniel(1977)。Social Change in the Twentieth Century。New York：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
2.	Lowi, Theodore J.(1969)。The End of Liberalism。New York：W. W. Norton。
3.	Andreski, S.(1969)。Parasitism and Subversion。New York：Schocken。
4.	Berger, Peter L.(1976)。Pyramids of Sacrifice。Garden City, NY：Anchor Books。
5.	Smith, Tony(1981)。The Pattern of Imperialism: the United States, Great Britain, and the Late-Industrializing World Since 1815。Cambrige University Press。
6.	United Nations Development Programme(1993)。Human Development Report 1993。New York：Oxford University Press。
7.	Inglehart, Ronald(1990)。Cultural Shift。Princeton：Princeton University Press。
8.	Jain, Shail(1975)。Size Distribution of Income。Washington, D. C.：World Bank。
9.	Adelman, Irma、Morris, Cynthia Taft(1967)。Society, politics, and economic development。Baltimore：Johns Hopkins university press。
10.	Ballmer-Cao, Thanh-Huyen、Scheidegger, Ju"rg(1979)。Compendium of Data for World System Analysis。Zurtrich：Soziologisches Institute der Universitat。
11.	CEPAL(1984)。CEPAL Review。
12.	Nabseth, L.、Ray, G.(1974)。The Diffusion of New Industrial Processes。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
13.	Seligson, Mitchell A.(1984)。The Gap Between Rich and Poor。Boulder：Westview Press。
14.	Taylor, Charles Lewis、Hudson, Michael C.(1972)。World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators。New Haven, Conn.：Yale University Press。
15.	Urrutia, M.(1985)。Winners and Losers of the 1970s: International book for Reconstruction and Development。The World Bank。
16.	World Bank(1995)。Social Indicators of Development 1995。New York：Oxford University Press。
17.	Schumpeter, Joseph A.(1950)。Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy。New York：Harper & Row。
18.	Wallerstein, Immanuel(1980)。The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600-1750。New York：Academic Press。
19.	Weber, Max、Parsons, Talcott(1958)。The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism。New York：Charles Scribner's Sons。
20.	The World Bank(1996)。World Development Report 1996: Form Plan to Market。Oxford University Press。
21.	Buchanan, James M.、Tollison, Robert D.、Tullock, Gordon(1980)。Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society。College Station, TX：Texas A&M University Press。
22.	Lipset, Seymour Martin(1981)。Political Man--The Social Bases of Politics。Baltimore, Maryland：The Johns Hopkins University Press。
23.	Taylor, C. L.、Jodice, David A.(1983)。World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators。New Haven：Yale University Press。
24.	Fei, John C. H.、Ranis, Gustav、Kuo, Shirley W. Y.(1979)。Growth with Equity: The Taiwan Case。Oxford University Press。
25.	Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York：Harper and Row。
26.	Dahl, Robert A.(1971)。Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。
27.	Huntington, Samuel P.、Nelson, Joan M.(1976)。No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries。Harvard University Press。
28.	McClelland, David C.(1961)。The Achieving Society。Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.。
29.	Olson, Mancur Jr.(1982)。The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities。New Haven：Yale University Press。

圖書論文
1.	Frank, Andre Gunder(1972)。The Development of Underdevelopment。Dependence and Underdevelopment: Latin America’s Political Economy。New York：Doubleday & Company, Inc。
2.	Aujac, Henri(1981)。Cultures and Growth。The Political Economy of New and Old Industrial Countries。Butterworths。
3.	Bornschier, Volker(1983)。Dependent Reproduction in the World System: A Study on the Incidence of Dependency Reversal。North/South Relations。New York：Praeger。
4.	Chase-Dunn, Christopher(1983)。Inequality, Structural Mobility, and Dependency Reversal in the Capitalist World Economy。North/South Relations。New York：Praeger。
5.	Fields, Gary(1980)。Assessing progress toward greater equality of income inequality。Third-World Poverty: New Strategies for Measuring Development Progress。Lexington, MA：Lexington Books。
6.	Inkeles、Smith(1974)。Becoming Modem。The Gap Between Rich and Poor。Boulder：Westview Press。
7.	Webb, Richard C.(1976)。The distribution of income in Peru。Income distribution in Latin America。New York：Cambridge University Press。
8.	Huntington, Samuel P.、Dominiquez, Jorge I.(1975)。Political Development。Handbook of Political Science, Volume 3: Macro-political Theory。Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	國際視野下的香港立法會普選之道
2.	「可信任的陌生感」：關於將複雜性概念引入民主(化)與社會信任之連結的另種思考
3.	民主化的社會經濟基礎：公民抗爭運動的跨國實證研究
4.	以民主政治的基本規則分析臺灣民主政治的發展
5.	經濟發展與臺灣的政治民主化
6.	人權與民主（1）：共生或互斥﹖
7.	中共基層民主建設中「鄉政」與「村治」的關係探討
8.	經濟發展對政治穩定性的影響
9.	民主與經濟發展:結合質與量的研究方法

1.	台灣民眾民主態度及相關因素路徑關係之研究
2.	宗教與民主化：社會系統理論觀點的檢視與重構

1.	印度民主發展歷程及評價

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫