:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣公害糾紛機制未來發展方向
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:朱斌妤 引用關係汪銘生
作者(外文):Chu, Pin-yuWang, Ming-sheng
出版日期:1999
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁189-211
主題關鍵詞:糾紛處理替代途徑環境調處環境仲裁公害糾紛 衝突管理Alternative dispute resolutionEnvironmental disputeEnvironmental mediationEnvironmental arbitrationConflict management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:59
     依據歐美日等國家的經驗,「糾紛處理替代途徑( Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR )」已成為解決環境糾紛的重要管道, 我國政府亦於 81 年 2 月頒定「 公害糾紛處理法」,依法省縣市各級政府「公害糾紛調處、仲裁委員會」陸續成立。然由過 去的環境調處( mediation )與仲裁( arbitration )案件觀察得知,現階段該組織有時 無法免除泛政治化的陰影,加上調處委員會的效率、公信力仍遭部分民眾與廠商質疑等問題 ,以致成效有限。 參照歐美國家民間調處(仲裁)機制健全與運作靈活的情形,同時考量我國相關研究顯示「 當正常管道無法有效解決的環境事件時,民眾首將向環境紛爭調處團體(例如中華民國消費 者文教基金會)提出申請」之事實,繼續推廣環境調處相關觀念與鼓勵民間非營利調處組織 之成立應有其價值。 由於重工業多在臺灣南部,加上近年來環境糾紛多發生在大高雄地區,本文即針對此地區, 透過問卷調查,了解南臺灣社會大眾對於「政府與民間環境糾紛調處組織」的態度,同時經 由檢討政府公害糾紛委員會工作成效,進而提出健全多元化公害糾紛處理機制政策性的建議 。
     Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) provides an important and effective alternative for environmental conflict resolution and for coordination in collaborative problem-solving situations. The desire to reduce cases of "self-help" environmental dispute has made ADR a popular approach in U.S.a. Despite the fact that there have been governmental mediation-arbitration systems assisting in the settlement of public pollution disputes since 1992, ADR remains uncommon in our society due to problems such as inefficiency, political complexity, etc. In this paper, we explore fundamental problems in current official ADR systems and describe our aims in managing these problems via case studies. Our primary discussion focuses on the concept of private, non-profit organizations for resolving environmental dispoutes. We describe how we are assessing the applicability of this alternative with a public opinion survey in Kaohsiung area and then suggest future directions based on the survey results.
期刊論文
1.汪銘生、黃國良(19941200)。環境中介的角色及其倫理責任。思與言,32(4),63-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.丘昌泰(1994)。探索石化工業環境糾紛的迷思:政策利害關係人角度的觀察。國立臺北大學學報,29,105-175。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳昭德(1990)。先進各國公害糾紛處理制度。國際交流學報,2,1-82。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cormick, Gerald W.(1980)。The Theory and Practice of Environmental Mediation。The Environmental Professional,2,24-33。  new window
5.Cormick, Gerald W.(1980)。The Myth Reality and Future of Environmental Mediation。Environment,4(7),14-39。  new window
6.Haynes, J. M.(1982)。A Conceptual Model of the Process of Family Mediation: Implications for Training。The American Journal of Family Therapy,10(4),5-16。  new window
7.Honeyman, C.(1990)。The Common Core of Mediation。Mediation Quarterly,8(1),73-82。  new window
8.Kressel, K.、Pruitt, D. G.(1985)。Themes in the Mediation of Social Conflict。Journal of Social Issues,41,179-198。  new window
9.Rubin, J. Z.(1983)。Experimental Research on Third-party Intervention in Conflict: Toward Some Generalizations。Psychological Bulletin,87,379-391。  new window
10.Susskind, Lawrence、McCreary, S.(1985)。Techniques for Resolving Coastal Resource Management Disputes through Negotiation。American Planning Association Journal,51,365-374。  new window
會議論文
1.朱斌妤、汪銘生、蘇明敏(1996)。石化業建立社區管理系統工作重點。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Chu, P. Y.(1994)。Cognitive Conflict Resolution: Mediation Analysis and Strategies(博士論文)。Stanford University。  new window
2.行政院環境保護署(1996)。八十五年度公害糾紛處理工作檢討會書面資料,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaufman, Sanda(1985)。Mediation to Resolve Conflict: Theory, Experimentation and Case Studies,0。  new window
圖書
1.蕭新煌(1988)。七○年代反汙染自力救濟的結構與過程分析。台北:行政院環境保護署。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院經建會健全經社法規工作小組(1988)。公害糾紛處理及民事救濟法制之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bingham, Gail(1986)。Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience。Washington, DC:The Conservation Foundation。  new window
4.Dunn, William N.(1994)。Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction。Prentice-Hall International Inc.。  new window
5.林建元、許秉翔(1995)。工業區之環境衝突管理-以大社工業區公害糾紛事件為例。環境決策與管理(四)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院研究發展考核委員會(1995)。公害糾紛處理政策與法制之研究。公害糾紛處理政策與法制之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃俊英、蔡敦浩、汪銘生(1988)。環保系統中中介團體角色之研究。行政院環境保護署。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉俊榮、簡資修(1992)。美國環境法上「糾紛處理替代途逕」在我國實施可行性之研究。美國環境法上「糾紛處理替代途逕」在我國實施可行性之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.Amy, D. J.(1987)。The Politics of Environmental Mediation。The Politics of Environmental Mediation。New York, NY。  new window
10.Carnevale, P. J.、Rodney, L. G.、McLaughlin, Mary E.(1989)。Contingent Mediation Behavior and Its Effectiveness。Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention。San Francisco, CA。  new window
11.Kressel, K.(1972)。Labor Mediation: An Exploratory Survey。Labor Mediation: An Exploratory Survey。沒有紀錄。  new window
12.Moore, C. W.(1986)。The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict。San Francisco, CA:Josey-Bass。  new window
13.(1984)。Resolving Environmental Regulatory Disputes。Resolving Environmental Regulatory Disputes。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top