:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從勞動三權觀點論公共部門教師會協商權與罷工權
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:衛民
作者(外文):Wei, Michael M.
出版日期:1999
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁265-299
主題關鍵詞:公共部門教師會協商權罷工權Public sectorTeachers' associationsRight to bargainRight to strike
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:141
  • 點閱點閱:124
     團結權、協商權和罷工權是民間部門勞工基本權利,1970年代之後這些權利逐漸 賦予公共部門員工。對於教師而言,團結權已普遍適用,但由於公共部門具有主權、獨占性 產品,以及公共利益等三大特質,協商權和罷工權仍受到不同程度的限制。我國教師已享有 團結權和部份的協商權,但罷工權仍完全受限制。本研究調查發現,公立學校教師會理事長 和校長都支持教師會擁有協商權,但罷工權部份校長表示強烈反對,而教師會理事長也有四 成反對比率。本研究認為協商權應賦予教師,但協商範圍要加以適當地限制,至於罷工權則 不宜行使,但要有申訴和爭議處理制度予以配合。
     Rights to organize, bargain and strike are three fundamental rights of the workers in the private sector. These rights were extended to public employees beginning in the 1970s. The public sector's three char acteristics are: to guard the public- interest, to guard government sovereignty, and to guarantee the public control of the distribution of goods and services. Taiwanese teachers in the public schools have the right to organize, but rights to bargain and strike are still restricted to some extent. From this survey we find that the presidents of teachers' associations and principals of public schools in Taiwan generally agree that teachers have the right to bargain. The principals of the public schools strongly disagree however that teachers have the right to strike that forty percent of the association president respondents also disagree. This study suggests the right to bargain should be extended to teachers but with a properly limited bargaining scope. The right to strike is not a proper means for teachers to pursue their economic and social benefits.
期刊論文
1.衛民(19961100)。公共部門教師組織--從勞動三權中團結權的分析。空大行政學報,6,55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.ILO(1992)。International Labour Conventions and Recommendations, 1919-1991。International Labour Conventions and Recommendations, 1919-1991。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(1998)。中華民國教育統計。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.曹俊漢(1995)。公務員協會組織與功能之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.藍科正(1997)。臺灣公共部門勞雇關係之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.曹俊漢(1995)。公務員協會組織與功能之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.藍科正(1997)。臺灣公共部門勞雇關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳昆璋(1993)。我國公立中小學教師籌組工會可行性之研究--以臺北縣公立中小學教師為實證研究對象(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中國勞工運動史續編編纂委員會(1984)。中國勞工運動史。臺北:中國文化大學勞工研究所理事會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sugeno, Kazuo(1992)。Japanese Labor Law。Tokyo:University of Tokyo Press。  new window
3.Carrell, Michael R.、Heavrin, Christina(1998)。Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining。Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Kochan, Thomas A.、Katz, Harry C.(1988)。Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations。Homewood, IL:IRWIN。  new window
5.Sloane, Arthur A.、Witney, Fred(1997)。Labor Relations。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall。  new window
6.吳庚(199004)。公務員基準法之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cooper, B. S.(1992)。Labor relations in education: An international perspective。Westport:Greenwood Press。  new window
8.Cooper, B. S.(1992)。Labor Relations in Education: An International Perspective。Westport:Greenwood Press。  new window
9.Sauer, Robert L.、Voelker, Keith E.(1993)。Labor Relations: Structure and Process。New York:MacMillan Publishing Company。  new window
10.中國勞工運動史編纂委員會(1984)。中國勞工運動史。臺北:文化大學勞工研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳繼盛(1994)。勞工法論文集。財團法人陳林法學文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Coleman, Charles J.(1990)。Managing Labor Relations in the Public Sector。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
13.吳庚(1994)。公務員基準法之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.立法院秘書處(1995)。教師法案。臺北:立法院秘書處。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃越欽(19910000)。勞動法論。臺北:國立政治大學勞工研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.許慶雄(19910000)。社會權論。臺北:眾文。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.謝瑞智(1992)。教育法學。文笙。  延伸查詢new window
18.衛民(1995)。集體協商與勞資關係。臺灣省勞資關係協進會。  延伸查詢new window
19.Betten, Lammy(1993)。International Labour Law。International Labour Law。Netherlands。  new window
20.Burton, John F.、Terry, Thomason(1998)。The Extent of Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector。Public-Sector Bargaining。Washington, DC。  new window
21.Getman, Julius G.、Pogrebin, Bertrand B.(1988)。Labor Relations - The Basic Processes, Law and Practice。Labor Relations - The Basic Processes, Law and Practice。Westbury, NY。  new window
22.Grant, Michel(1992)。Canada。Labor Relations in Education。Westport, CT。  new window
23.ILO(1992)。International Labour Conventions and Recommendations, 1919-1991。International Labour Conventions and Recommendations, 1919-1991。Geneva, Switzerland。  new window
24.Valticos, N.、von Potobsky, G.(1995)。International Labour Law。International Labour Law。Netherlands。  new window
25.(1980)。U. S. Labor and Employment Laws。U. S. Labor and Employment Laws。Washington, DC。  new window
26.Betten, Lammy(1993)。International Labour Law。International Labour Law。The Netherlands。  new window
27.Burton, John. F.、Terry, Thomason(1998)。The Extent of Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector。Public-Sector Bargaining。Washington, D.C.。  new window
28.Carrell, Michael R.、Heavrin, Christina(1998)。Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining。Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining。New Jersey。  new window
29.Coleman, Charles J.(1990)。Managing Labor Relations in the Public Sector。Managing Labor Relations in the Public Sector。San Francisco/ California。  new window
30.Getman, Julius G.、Bertrand B. Pogrebin(1988)。Labor Relations--The Basic Processes, Law and Practice。Labor Relations--The Basic Processes, Law and Practice。Westbury/ New York。  new window
31.Grant, Michel(1992)。Canada。Labor Relations in Education。Wesport/ Connecticut。  new window
32.Sauer, Robert L.、Voelker, Keith E.(1933)。Labor Relations: Structure and Process。Labor Relations: Structure and Process。New York。  new window
33.Sloane, Authur A.、Witney, Fred(1997)。Labor Relations。Labor Relations。New Jersey。  new window
34.Sugeno, Kazuo(1992)。Japanese Labor Law。Japanese Labor Law。Tokyo。  new window
35.Valticos, N.、Potobsky, G. Von(1995)。International Labour Law。International Labour Law。The Netherlands。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(1998)。人力資源調查統計年報-八十六年,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.U. S. Department of State(1996)。Reporting on Workers Rights, 1995,0。  new window
3.U. S. Department of State(1997)。Reporting on Workers Rights, 1996,0。  new window
4.行政院主計處(1998)。人力資源查統計年報-八十六年,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部統計處(1997)。中華民國教育統計-民八十六年,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.West, Ruth C.(1980)。U.S. Labor and Employment Laws,Washington, D.C.。  new window
7.U. S. Department of State(1996)。Reporting on Workers Rights, 1995。  new window
8.U. S. Department of State(1997)。Reporting on Workers Rights, 1996。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE