臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：不同寫作程度學生在過程寫作教學中的發展情形之探討
書刊名：國民教育研究學報
作者：黃秀文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Hsiu-wen
出版日期：1999
卷期：5
頁次：頁1-27
主題關鍵詞：寫作程度；學生；寫作教學
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:38
　　　　　藉由質的微觀分析法，本研究以一班小學四年級之不同寫作程度的焦點學生為參 與者，以一學期的時間，進行過程寫作教學的應用研究。焦點學生的作品品質、 寫作概念和態度的發展情形為本研究探討的重點。 本研究結果顯示，程度好的學生在寫作成品、概念、和態度士都一直都有不 錯的表現。程度中等學生之寫作成品進步最大，他們也具備丁更多約寫作概念， 在寫作態度上也都由原來的消極被動轉趨積極認真。寫作程度不佳的學生，他們 後來作品的段落安排較佳，內容較多，表達也較流暢，對於寫作標準也有較深一 層次的認知，但進步幅度不若中等程度學生來得大。根據研究結果，本研究指出 過程寫作活動對於學生的寫作動機和認知有相當正面的促進作用，然程度不佳的 學生需要更多的支持與協助，單靠環境刺激是不夠的。
　　　　　By means of the micro-analysis of the qualitative research method, this study investigated the implementation of process writing approach in one fourth-grade classroom for one semester. Focal students with different writing abilities were the participants. The central focus of this study was to explore the development of these focal students in their writing products, concepts, and attitudes. The results showed that good writers always kept good performance in their writing products, concepts, and attitudes. Students of ordinary talent made the most progress in their products. They also cognized more writing concepts and showed a more positive attitude toward writing. Poor writers' progress was not obvious even though their later writing was longer and more fluent and they exhibited a better understanding of writing standards. According to the results, the study indicated that process writing approach could stimulate students' writing motivation and cognition, but poor writers needed more support and assistance besides motivating environment.
期刊論文
1.Varble, M. E.(1990)。Analysis of writing sample of students taught by teachers using whole language and traditional approaches。Journal of Educational Research，83，245-251。  new window
2.Edelsky, C.(1982)。Writing in a bilingual program: the relation of L1 and L2 texts。TESOL Quarterly，16(2)，211-228。  new window
3.Hayes, J. R.、Flower, L. S.(1986)。Writing research and the writer。American Psychologist，41，1106-1113。  new window
4.Davis, A.、Clarke, M.、Rhodes, L.(1994)。Extended text and the writing proficiency of students in urban elementary schools。Journal of Educational Psychology，86，556-566。  new window
5.Duin, A. H.、Graves, M. F.(1987)。Intensive Vocabulary Instruction as a Prewriting Technique。Reading Research Quarterly，22，311-330。  new window
6.Harlin, R. P.、Lipa, S. E.(1993)。Assessment: Insughts into children’s beliefs and perceptions about process writing。Reading Horizons，33，287-299。  new window
7.McCarthey, S. J.、Raphael, T. E.(1989)。Alternative perspectives of reading/writing connections。Occasional Paper，130。  new window
8.Sudol, D.、Sudol, P.(1995)。Yet another story: Writers' workshop revisited。€ŠLanguage Arts，72，171-178。  new window
9.Hairston, Maxine(1982)。The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing。College Composition and Communication，33(1)，76-88。  new window
10.王萬清(19970600)。過程取向寫作教學在不同寫作環境中的效果研究。初等教育學報，10，127-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Raphael, T. E.、Kirschner, B. M.(1985)。The effects of instruction in compare/contrast text structure on sixth-grade students' reading comprehension writing products。East Lansing, MI：Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Taching。  new window
學位論文
1.趙金婷(1992)。國小學童寫作過程之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡銘津(1991)。寫作過程教學法對國小學兒童寫作成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Calkins, L. M.(1986)。The Art Of Teaching Writing。Portsmouth, NH：Heinemann。  new window
2.Graves, D. H.(1983)。Writing: Teachers and children at work。Heinemann。  new window
3.Atwell, N.(1987)。In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents。Portsmith, NH：Heinemann。  new window
4.張新仁(1992)。寫作教學研究--認知心理學取向。高雄：復文圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.Best, L.(1995)。A critique of cognitive research on writing from three critical perspectives: Theoretical, methodological, and practical(ED 377516)。  new window
2.Casey, J.(1992)。Writing to read in the classroom: Literature-based, writing process approach(ED 376-953)。  new window
3.Jackson, D.(1996)。Specialized training in process writing(ED 395313)。  new window
4.Monteith, S.(1991)。Writing process vs. traditional writing classrooms: Writing ability and attitudes of second grade students(ED395313)。  new window
5.Strech, L. L.(1994)。Action research: The implementation of writing workshop in the third grade(ED 380798)。  new window
6.Thomas, M.(1994)。Case study: Program for improving writing skills(ED 393113)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scardamalia, M.、Bereiter, C.(1986)。Research on written composition。Handbook of research on teaching。New York：Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
2.Erickson, F.(1986)。Qualitative methods in research on teaching。Handbook of research on teaching。New York：Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1140（臺灣：1134，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67926655
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上