:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從兒童的測量迷思概念看教師對兒童測量知識的了解
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報
作者:譚寧君 引用關係
作者(外文):Tan, Ning-chun
出版日期:1999
卷期:12
頁次:頁407-436
主題關鍵詞:兒童測量迷思概念教師知識的了解
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:88
     本研究為了解國小教師對兒童知識的了解情形,先透過筆測、面談了解兒童測量概念與其可能的錯誤類型,再透過教師對數學問題的難易分析及理由的陳述,了解教師對兒童測量概念知識的了解情形。結果發現: (一)國小教師對兒童測量概念的瞭解,長度最佳,面積次之,體積顯然不足。 (二)國小教師對個別單位量計數的認知較為有限,從長度的刻度報讀到面積的單 位覆蓋與體積的單位堆積,均一再呈現單位量掌握與轉換過程,但似乎均未被教師察覺,仍以實作、點數與列式計算為主要教學思考。 (三)國小教師的教學信念很明顯的呈現於問題的分析上,多數教師均以直覺或經驗來判斷。如:數字小、格數少、教材中曾呈現者較易,反之則較難;視覺點數較易,需透過運算符號取得的則較難;加減法運算較易,乘除法運算較難;普遍忽略了其他暗隱因素的影響。 (四)國小教師非常重視教材在課程中出現的順序與地位,較不易掌握螺旋式課程設計的精神與兒童認知發展的過程,如往往以教材出現的次序為難易的標準,且以為只要在教材中呈現的概念即應達到完備的程度,忽略課程概忥間相互依隨的關係,即從嚐試錯誤的經驗中,察覺與重組概念的重要。 (五)國小教師對公式的教學認知上有明顯差異,尤其在面積與體積部份最為明顯,有的教師認為可以套用公式的問題比較容易,有的則認為公式的意義建立頗為困難,故必需套用公式者比較難。 (六)國小教師對學生解題策略的類型仍不能有效掌握,從學生的解題策略與教師的填答理由發現差異頗大,學生最普遍的方式是以視覺解題,教師往往以數字大小及運算符號的類別為判斷標準。 根據上述結論,提出六點建議,期望能提供師資培育單位參考。
     The importance about the teachers' pedagogical content knowledge was recommended by many research works. To fulfill the purpose, the process of the study included pencil-paper test, interview, analysis of the students' error patterns, and the teachers' explanation on tbe students' misconception in measurement Research findings were as following: 1.About the elementary teachers' knowledge on the understanding of children's cognition knowledge in measurement, the teachers can under stand the concept of length best, the concept of area next, the concept of volume last. 2.Most of the teachers' understanding on the concept of the unit were not sufficient, especially the unit of measurement. 3.Over 80% of the teachers used their intuition or experience to analyze the level of mathematics problem without a complete understanding of children methods in solving problem. 4.It was hard for teachers to identify the relationship between the sequence of teaching material curriculum and the stages of cognitive ability. Most of the teachers had a misconception about the spiral curriculum. 5.Teachers' viewpoints about memorizing formulas are different. Some teachers considered that memorizing without understanding is difficult, but some didn't. 6.Children's problem solving strategies were not completely understood by the teachers. Based on the above findings, six recommendations were suggested.
期刊論文
1.Carpenter, T. P.、Fennema, E.、Peterson, P. L.、Chiang, C. P.、Loef, M.(1989)。Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study。American Educational Research Journal,26(4),499-532。  new window
2.譚寧君(19980600)。國小兒童面積迷思概念分析研究。臺北師院學報,11,573-601。  延伸查詢new window
3.高敬文(19891200)。我國國小學童測量概念發展之研究。初等教育研究,1,183-219。  延伸查詢new window
4.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
5.林仁得、謝祥宏、陳文典(1993)。國小學童對體積測量的認識。師大學報,38,269-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張仁邦(1996)。數學實驗教學法-面積與體積的計算。國教新知,42(9/10),28-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃偉蓉、林秋麗、陳文典(1993)。國小學童對長度測量的認識。臺北師院學報,6,43-66。  延伸查詢new window
8.簡紅珠(1996)。教學發展趨勢。高市鐸聲,7(1),22-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.Even, R.、Markovits, Z.(1991)。Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge: The case of functions。Proceeding of PME 15,1。  new window
會議論文
1.陳鉪逸(1996)。我國國小高年級學生平面圖形面積概念的研究。0。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fujita, Hideharu(1993)。The study of understanding in arithmetic education understanding phase and learning process model in case of area-learning fourth graders。沒有紀錄。236-243。  new window
3.Carpenter, T. P.、Fennema, E.、Peterson, P. L.、Carry, D. A.(1987)。Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics。Washington, DC。  new window
研究報告
1.周武男(1988)。國中生實測概念之發展。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡春美(1982)。臺東縣山地兒童面積保留與面積測量概念(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Marks, R.(1990)。Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary Mathematics(博士論文)。Stanford University,Stanford, CA.。  new window
3.黃永和(1996)。國小實習教師數學學科教學知識之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭速農(1995)。國小專家教師與初任教師的數學學科知識之分析與比較(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂玉琴(1994)。國小教師分數教學之相關知識研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄧優君(1998)。師院實習生數學教學實踐之反省與成長,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hart, K. M.、Kerslake, D.、Brown, M. L.、Ruddock, G.、Kuchemann, D. E.、McCartney, M.(1981)。Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16。London, England:John Murray。  new window
2.李調棟(1994)。國小四年級學童對面積問題自發性之解題類型研究。國小四年級學童對面積問題自發性之解題類型研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.毛松霖(1977)。測量。測量。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉秋木(1996)。國小數學科教材教法。國小數學科教材教法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fennema, E.、Franke, M. L.(1992)。Teachers' knowledge and its impact。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。New York:Macmillan Press。  new window
2.簡紅珠(1994)。師範生學科與學科教學的知識基礎。師範教育多元化與師資素養。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE