:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從政企關係比較兩岸經濟發展策略
書刊名:中國大陸研究
作者:周添城
作者(外文):Chou, Tein-chen
出版日期:1999
卷期:42:10
頁次:頁17-28
主題關鍵詞:經濟體制政企關係國企改革經濟自由化民營化Economic systemGovernment-enterprise relationThe reform of SOEsEconomic liberalizationPrivatization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:36
     兩岸分治五十年,正好也在政治、經濟、社會制度上競爭了五十年。就經濟發展 方面,本文嘗試以政企關係的演變來進行比較分析。中國大陸的前三十年是反市場的計畫性 統治經濟體制。因此,這個階段裡的「企業」,其實是政府計畫機構的執行單位,所謂的國 企改革就是要把這種執行單位的角色轉換為現代化的經營體制,這當中不但涉及經營自主權 的提高,更涉及政府體制與職能的轉變,社會保障制度的改革、住房改革、金融改革,其挑 戰將是非常艱難,未來的政企關係須要根本性的變革。至於臺灣方面,政府早期無論間接對 民間企業或直接對公營事業,都有非常強的影響力;但隨著經濟自由化、國際化的推動,政 府已退居遊戲規則制訂者與維護者的角色。從政企關係的演變可以清楚顯示兩岸過去經濟發 展策略之優劣,及未來經濟發展潛力之高低。
     Both sides of the Taiwan Strait have maintained independent sovereignty for fifty years, competing in the political, economic, and social realms. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis between the ROC and PRC, comparing the evolution of the government-enterprise relationship. In the first thirty years, the PRC adopted a command economic system, with so-called " enterprise" being only a "branch" of the government. During the past twenty years, and even under the policy of economic reform, the basic role of most ofstate-owned-enterprises (SOEs) did not change, therefore meaning no sound relationship has existed between government and enterprise. However the reform of SOEs in China is just in the initialstages, thus the normalization of the relationship between government and enterprise needs watching in the future. Comparing this to the case of Taiwan, we find that the KMT government has gradually moved its hand off of Taiwan's enterprises. Tn the early development stage, the government enjoyed many instruments with which to interfere with both public and private enterprises, either directly or indirectly. After a long process of economic liberalization and privatization, the government has finally begun to play the role of game-ruler and let the enterprises compete with each other based on market mechanisms. We can conclude that the gap between the ROC and the PRC in the domain of government-enterprises relation reflects the gap of economic development between both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
期刊論文
1.周叔蓮(1998)。「十五大」報告在經濟理論方面的創新和貢獻。中國工業經濟,2。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳德昇(1998)。中共「十五大」經濟政策取向與政治意涵。中國大陸研究,41(2),3-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Chou, T. C.(1985)。The Pattern and Strategy of Industrialization in Taiwan: Specialization and Offsetting Policy。The Developing Economies,32(2),138-157。  new window
研究報告
1.陳麗瑛、范錦明、黃聰智(1993)。兩岸工業結構變動及未來產業互動趨勢之研究 (計畫編號:135-1(0105135(1)))。臺北:中華經濟研究院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1999)。臺灣民營化的經驗。臺北市:中華徵信所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fry, M. J.(1988)。Money, Interest and Banking in Economic Development。Baltimore, Maryland:John Hopkins University Press。  new window
3.周添城、林志誠(1999)。台灣中小企業的發展機制。臺北:聯經出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Mckinnon, Ronald Ian(1973)。Money and Capital in Economic Development。Brookings Institution Press。  new window
5.薛琦、胡仲英(1999)。民營化政策的回顧與展望。臺灣民營化的經驗。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.李宗哲(1997)。兩岸工業發展互動模式規劃之研究-五年總結報告。兩岸工業發展互動模式規劃之研究-五年總結報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.傅豐誠(1998)。大陸工業政策與發展現況研究後續研究(四)。大陸工業政策與發展現況研究後續研究(四)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳敬璉(1998)。國有經濟的戰略性改組。國有經濟的戰略性改組。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.金碚(1997)。何去何從-當代中國的國有企業問題。何去何從-當代中國的國有企業問題。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.王洛林、陳佳貴(1997)。現代企業制度的理論與實踐。現代企業制度的理論與實踐。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.沈志漁(1997)。企業法人治理結構。現代企業制度的理論與實踐。北京。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE