:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:史記秦楚之際月表論考
書刊名:臺大歷史學報
作者:閻鴻中 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Hung-chung
出版日期:1999
卷期:23
頁次:頁93-121
主題關鍵詞:司馬遷史記秦楚之際月表體例年月例魏豹鉅鹿之戰Sima QianShijiThe Table by Months of the Times of Qin and Chu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
在《史記‧十表》中,記時單位最小、涵蓋時間也最短的是〈秦楚之際月表〉。此表是將秦二世元年七月至漢高帝五年 (前209-202) 間的大事按月編排,但其記時體例一直備受質疑。本文首先釐清其年月例,進而闡述此表的記事功能。 (月表〉的年月例分為三類:甲、紀正朔年月(4人,8%);乙、計月而數( 28人,56%) ;丙、兼計年月(18人,36%,含隱性案例九人)。藉由從計月者中鉤稽出兼計年月的隱性案例,全表98%的案倒皆獲得合理的解釋。甲例銜接住泰、漢兩朝的曆年,確立了時間的界碑:乙、丙則標示出群雄起事或封王的歲月多寡。初起抗秦的群雄多用乙例;而丙例除一人存疑外,若非領袖群倫如懷王、項羽之流,就是最終服屬漢廷的諸侯王。初起群雄,恰與歸漢之諸侯王代謝消長;故而計月者盡亡之時,即漢王朝一統之日。明白此例,當時天下分合推移的過程一覽可知。在記事功能方面,涉及這一時期的《史記》本紀、世家和列傳,極少標明事件發生的月分,許多關鍵資料都只記載在〈月表〉裏。本文以表文前半涉及秦、楚和項氏的三個部份為例,說明太史公以表來統攝全書相關紀傳的寫作手法。文末 〈附錄〉則係表文辨證六則。
The 'Chronological Table by Months from Qin tο Chu' recorded major events that happened during the period from the Second Emperor of Qin (209B.C.) to the establishment of the Han Dynasty (202B.C.). Of the Ten Tables of Shiji, it is the table that covers the shortest period of time and uses the smallest unit of time. The rules governing its timing have not been correctly analyzed by any readers or historians, and have been criticized so severely that its significance and uses could not be estimated properly. By examining every case in this table, it becomes clear that there are three types of time- recording in all: 1. that using signs of the official calendar such as yuan-nian (元年)and jeng-yueh (正月);2. that using the number of months since the rise of the characters; 3.that using the number of months as well as of years. In the light of above analysis, nearly all of the rules of time- recording can be recognized, and 98% of the cases can be explained logically. With the understanding of the rules and their characters, the readers of the Table can easily find the historical changes during that eight years. In addition, the Table also includes many important and special records. In conclusion, the Table is essential to understanding what actually happened in the history of Qin and Chu that cannot be found elsewhere.
圖書
1.司馬遷、裴駟、司馬貞、張守節、淩稚隆、李光縉、有井範平(1992)。補標史記評林。臺北:地球出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.崔適(1977)。史記探源。臺北:廣城出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.水澤利忠(1957)。史記會注考證校補。東京:史記會注考證校補刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
4.施之勉(1976)。史記會注考證訂補。臺北:華岡出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉咸炘(1976)。四史知意。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.班固、王先謙(1955)。漢書補注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.王叔岷(1983)。史記斠證。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊燕起、陳可青、賴長揚(1986)。歷代名家評《史記》。北京師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.張文虎(1977)。校刊史記集解索隱正義札記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.董仲舒、蘇輿、鍾哲(1992)。春秋繁露義證。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.周尚木(1985)。史記識誤。史記識誤。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
12.錢穆(1995)。史記地名考。史記地名考。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.伊藤徳男(1994)。史記十表に見る司馬遷の歴史観。史記十表に見る司馬遷の歴史観。東京都。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(唐)司馬貞。史記索隱。  延伸查詢new window
2.(東漢)班固(1978)。漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.王夫之(2001)。讀通鑑論,北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.(西漢)司馬遷(1980)。史記三家注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)汪越。讀史記十表,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)王元啟(1982)。史記月表正訛,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)錢大昕(1971)。廿二史考異,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)夏燮(1982)。校漢書八表,北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)周壽昌(1977)。漢書注校補,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.阮芝生。史記十表新編。  延伸查詢new window
11.阮芝生。史記十表史文出處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梁玉繩(1977)。史記志疑。四史辨疑。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE