在今、古文家的經學論戰裡，無論是主張孔子以前就有經學的古文家，或是肯定 孔子即經學開闢者的今文家，幾乎都把重點擺在儒家傳經的系統問題上。儒家固然是研究中 國經學的第一扇門，然而，經學既然影響中國數千年之久，恐怕不只有儒家與其接觸，擴散 的範圍應該更大。事實上，也有不少學者認為：「六經，則古代道術之總匯，非儒家所得而 私有之也」試想，既然較莊子晚出的荀子、韓非子都與經書有關，站在「諸子皆六經之支與 流裔」的立場，莊子與經學的關係，自然就是個急待解開的謎題了。基於以上的考量，筆者 嘗試以今傳本三十三篇《莊子》中的內七篇為主證，視〈天下〉篇為莊書後序，參酌外、雜 篇為佐證的角度，來考察《莊子》一書與經學的關係。本文先自莊子思想淵源中的「宗古說 」、「宗老子說」、「宗孔門說」，試探其與經學的關係；其次，則針對莊子與六經之關係 ，考察莊子對經的詮釋態度，進而列舉六經與莊子相近的思想，用以說明莊子與經學關係密 切。此外，也將儒家與莊子之經學觀，在態度、方法目標的歧出共融加以比較，最後得到結 論。

　　　　　In the discussion between Ancient and Modern literary people (今文家), Ancient literary people( 古文家 ) believe that Scripture was before Confucius ( 孔子 ), and Modern literary believe that Confucius was the ancestor of the Scripture. They all focus on the system of Confucian (儒家 ) Scripture. Although Confucian was the first of Scripture in China and had effected China for thousands of years, it should contact with other literary and expand its scope. In fact, many literary people believe "The Six Classics (六經 ) doesn't belong to Confucian but belongs to all Ancient literary." Although Chuang Tzu (莊子 ) was later than Shyun Tzu (荀子 ) and Han-Fei Tzu (韓非子 )they were all related. Viewing from the point of "Many literary is part of The Six Classics", the relationship between Chuang Tzu and Classics is an unsolved mystery. Based on the above, I try to find out the proves from Chuang Tzu's Inner Seven pieces (內 七篇 ).seeing "Ten-Shen pieces (天下篇 ) as the Scripture's back preface, referring Wai pieces (外篇 ) and Cha pieces (雜篇 ) to find out the relationships between Chuang Tzu and Classics. First this article comes from Chuang Tzu's "The theory from Ancient (宗古說 ) ","The theory from Lao Tzu (宗老 子說 ) ","The theory from Confucius (宗孔明說 ) "and it tries to find the relationships with Classics. Second, based on the relationships with Chuang Tzu and The Six Classics very much, finding out the explanation attitudes of Chuang Tzu towards Scripture. Moreover, it can list the similar thinking of The Six Classics and Chuang Tzu.It can also describe the relationship between Chuang Tzu and Classics. Besides, this article compares the Classics attitudes, method goals between Confucian and Chuang Tzu and finally gets the conclusion.