:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生態足跡、永續發展與臺灣農地保育
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:葉佳宗 引用關係黃書禮 引用關係劉小蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Chia-tsungHuang, Shu-liLiu, Hsiou-lan
出版日期:1999
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁189-208
主題關鍵詞:生態足跡容受力農業土地資源情境分析Ecological footprintCarrying capacityAgriculture landScenario analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:38
     農業是國家的基本產業,扮演著糧食給與社會安定的重要角色。臺灣農業目前面臨產業間競用農業土地資源壓力,以及未來加入世界貿易組織(WTO)等重大衝擊,國內有限農業土地資源的永續利用面臨嚴重的挑戰。妥善地規劃有限的國土資源,落實農業土地資源的保育是當前重要的工作。本文首先利用生態足跡(ecological footprints)觀念與方法,估計臺灣地區各類資源消費對於土地資源的需求,並對於生態足跡分析方式的缺失與限制加以探討。進而建立適合臺灣農業部門的生態足跡計算方式,進行臺灣地區農業土地資源供給與需求的估算,以探討歷來臺灣地區農產品消費對於土地資源需求的變化。研究結果顯示,臺灣地區農業生態足跡呈現逐年擴張的趨勢,由1981年的每人0.215公頃增加到1995年的每人0.333公頃。然而,臺灣農地每年減少4000公頃。換言之,臺灣糧食耕地需求與供給的比例逐漸擴大。此外,本文以不同農業政策為情境分析生態足跡的變遷,預測未來國內農業土地資源面臨可能的變動與衝擊,作為研擬農業土地資源保育與國家永續發展建議的基礎。
     Agriculture plays significant roles of food provision within a nation. The competition of land resources among different land use activities and the prospective participation in WTO have resulted in pressure of farmland preservation in Taiwan. Resolving the issue of preserving agricultural land is the primary concern of rational land use planning in Taiwan. This paper applies the concept and method of ecological footprint to estimate the amount of land required for different resource consumption. The drawbacks and limitation of the analysis ecological footprint is discussed. Therefter, a revised ecological footprint analysis for Taiwan's agriculture sector is developed to estimate the trend of the supply and demand of agricultural land. As a result, the ecological footprint agricultural land has increased from 0.215 in 1981 to 0.333 hectare per capita in 1995. However, approximately 4000 hectares of agricultural land have been converted for non-agricultural use per year. Scenarios of different agricultural policies are also proposed to discuss the likely effects the ecological footprint of Taiwan's agriculture.
期刊論文
1.黃書禮(19981200)。容受力分析的回顧與展望都市成長管理的生態經濟觀。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,9,45-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.彭作奎(19960100)。加入WTO臺灣農業政策之調整方向。臺灣經濟,229,17-41。  延伸查詢new window
3.Catton, W. R.(1987)。The World Most Polymorphic Species: Carrying Capacity Transgressed to Wats。Biosciencs,37,413-419。  new window
4.Harris, J. M.(1996)。World Agricultural Futures: Sustainability and Ecological Limits。Ecological Economics,17,95-115。  new window
5.Hazell, P. B. R.(1984)。Sources of Increased Instability in Indian and U. S. Cereal Production。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3),302-311。  new window
會議論文
1.楊振榮(1993)。台灣農地釋出政策之研究。海峽兩岸土地學術交流研討會,中國地政研究所 (會議日期: 1993/08/23-08/24)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.耿旭、楊之遠(1997)。二十一世紀全球糧食展望。全球變遷研討會,55-75。  延伸查詢new window
3.李永展(1997)。生態足跡:邁向永績性之規劃工具。台灣永續發展研討會。台北:國立中興大學法商學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭春發(1996)。容受力與都市永續性發展之研究--以台北都會區作個案研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wackemagel, Mathis、Rees, William E.(1996)。Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth。Gabriola Island, BC:New Society Publishers。  new window
2.Schneider, D. M.、Godschalk, D. R.、Axler, N.(1978)。The carrying capacity concepts as a planning tool。Chicago, IL:American Planning Association。  new window
其他
1.Wacekrnagel, M.(1997)。Ecological Footprints of Nations: How much Do They Use? How Nature Do They Have?,http://www.econucil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint。  new window
圖書論文
1.Folke, C.、Larsson, J.、Sweitaer, J.(1996)。Renewable resource appropriation by city。Getting Down to Earth。Washington:Island Press。  new window
2.Rees, W. E.、Wackernagel, M.(1994)。Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: Measuring the Natural Capital Requirements of the Human Economy。Investing in Natural Capital。Washington, DC:Island Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top