臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論雇主採用「胎兒保護措施」所引起之就業歧視爭議--Johnson Controls一案之分析-
作者：焦興鎧
書刊名：勞工法與勞工權利之保障：美國勞工法論文集(一)
頁次：389-443
出版日期：1995
出版項：臺北:月旦
主題關鍵詞：美國；胎兒保護措施；就業歧視
學門：法律學
資料類型：專書論文
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:14
期刊論文
1.Howard(1981)。Harvard Substances in the Workplace: Implications for the Employment Rights of Women。U. Pa. L. Rev.，129，798+802-810。  new window
2.Williams(1981)。Firing the Women to Protect the Fetus: The Reconciliation of Fetal Protection with Employment Opportunity Goals under Title VII。Geo. L. J.，69，641+644-668。  new window
3.Becker(1986)。From Muller v. Oregon to Fetal Vulnerability Policies。U. Chi. L. Rev.，53，1219+1225-1243。  new window
4.Buss(1986)。Getting Beyond Discrimination: A Regulatory Solution to the Problem of Fetal Hazards in the Workplace。Yale L. J.，95，577-581。  new window
5.Befort(1991)。BFOQ Revisited: Johnson Controls Halts the Expansion of the Defense to Intentional Sex Discrimination。OHIO ST. L. J.，52，5+29-43。  new window
6.Kirp(1992)。Fetal Hazards, Gender Justice, and the Justices: The Limits of Equality。Wm. & My. L. Rev.，34，89+106-113。  new window
7.(1992)。UAW v. Johnson Controls: A Final Word on Fetal Protection Policies and Their Effect on Women's Rights in the Workplace。Hofarea Lab. L. J.，9，451+469-480。  new window
8.(1991)。United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.: One Small Step for Womankind。Akron L. Rev.，25，413+420-423。  new window
9.Sullivan、Nowlin(1991)。Gender-Based Fetal Protection Policies: Impermissible Sex Discrimination。Lab. L. J.，42，387。  new window
10.(1992)。Pregnancy in the Wokplace--Sex-Specific Fetal Protection Policies UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.--A Victory for Women?。Tenn. L. Rev.，59，617+634-640。  new window
11.(1992)。Employment Discrimination--Fetal Protection Policies after Johnson Controls: A True Victory for Sexual Equality in the Workplace?。Wake Forest L. Rev.，27，769+789-794。  new window
12.(1992)。Warning: Denial of Fetal Protection under Title VII May be Hazardous to the Health of Industry and Society。Denv. U. L. Rev.，69，281+298-299。  new window
13.(1992)。UAW v. Johnson Controls: The Supreme Court Fails to Get the Lead out, Overlooks Fetal Harm Resulting from Workplace Exposure。Clev. St. L. Rev.，40，261+265-272。  new window
14.(1989)。Title VII--Bona Fide Occupational Defense--Necessity of Sex Discriminatory Policy Should be Evaluated According to a Totality of the Circumstance Test。Harv. L. Rev.，102，2048。  new window
15.Slonaker、Wendt(1991)。Pregnancy Discrimination: An Empirical Analysis of a Continuing Problem。Lab. L. J.，42，343。  new window
16.Bejarano(1992)。Labor Pains: The Rights of the Pregnant Employee。Lab. L. J.，43，780。  new window
17.(1983)。Sexual Equality Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act。Coolum. L. Rev.，83，690-699。  new window
18.Brierton、Lichter-Heath(1990)。Fetal Protection Policies: Balancing the Interests of the Employee, Employer, and the Unborn Under Title VII。Lab. L. J.，41，724。  new window
19.(1985)。Fetal Protection Programs under Title VII--Rebutting the Procreation Presumption。U. Pitt. L. Rev.，46，755+757-761。  new window
20.(1990)。International Union v. Johnson Controls, Inc.: Controlling Women's Equal Employment Opportunities through Fetal Protection Policies。Am. U. L. Rev.，40，453+466-469。  new window
21.Pierman(1990)。Fetal Protection Policies and Title VII。Lab. L. J.，41，840-842。  new window
22.(1993)。Protecting Employees' Fetuses from Workplace Hazards: Johnson Controls Narrows the Options。Berkeley J. Empl. & Lab.，14，142+149-150。  new window
23.(1992)。International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.: Fetal Protection Policies and the Subordination of a Woman's Economic Role to Her Reproductive Role in Society。Lorola U. L. J.，22，249+257。  new window
24.(1990)。Bridging the Gap: The Problem of Uniquely Susceptible Individuals in the Workplace。Tulane L. Rev.，64，1677+1682。  new window
25.(1992)。Fetal Protection: Valid Employer Concern or Disguise for Discrimination?。Miss C. L. Rev.，12，533+538-541。  new window
26.(1991)。Title VII--Gender Specific Fetal Protection Policies。Harv. L. Rev.，105，379-389。  new window
27.(1992)。The Status of Sex-Specific Fetal Protection Policies: International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.。Mo. L. Rev.，57，979+995-998。  new window
28.(1991)。UAW v. Johnson Controls: An Affirmance of Equal Employment Opportunities for Women。Creighton L. Rev.，25，185+186-191+202-210。  new window
29.(1992)。International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.: Death Toll of Fetal Protection in Business。St. Louis U. L. Rev.，36，187+191-196。  new window
30.Katz(1989)。Hazardous Working Conditions and Fetal Protection Policies: Women are Going Back to the Future。B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev.，17，201。  new window
31.(1990)。Fetal Protection and UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc., Job Openings for Barren Women Only。Fordam L. Rev.，53，843。  new window
32.(1990)。Title VII--Equal Employment Opportunity--Seventh Circuit Upholds Employer's Fetal Protection Plan--UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.。Harv. L. Rev.，103，977。  new window
33.(1990)。BFOQ Defense Extended to Fetal Protection Policies: International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.。B. C. L. Rev.，32，250。  new window
34.Rasnic(1992)。Germany's Legal Protection for Women Workers vis-a-vis Illegal Employment Discrimination in the United States: A Comparative Perspective in Light of Johnson Controls。Mich. J. Int'l，31，415+441。  new window
35.(1993)。Employer Liability after Johnson Controls: A No-Fault Solution。Stan. L. Rev.，45，453+467-483。  new window
36.EEOC(1990)。Policy Guide on United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls。Fair Employment Practice Cases，644，6797。  new window
37.EEOC(1988)。Policy Statement on Reproductive and Fetal Hazards Under Title VII。Fair Employment Practice Cases，641，6613。  new window
38.(1990)。Employment Discrimination Made Easy: Fetal Protection Policies。Valparaiso L. Rev.，24，441。  new window
39.(1990)。Fetal Protection Policies: A Statutory Proposal in the Wake of International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.。Cornell L. Rev.，75，1110。  new window
40.(1986)。Exploring the Limits of Legal Duty: A Union's Responsibilities with Respect to Fetal Protection Policies。Harv. J. Legis.，23，159+189-209。  new window
41.焦興鎧(19900600)。美國勞工法上就業歧視問題之最新發展。美國研究，20(2)，51-116。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.(1991)。Statistical Abstract of the United States 1990。  new window
圖書
1.Bureau of National Affairs, Pregnancy and Employment(1987)。The Complete Handbook on Discrimination, Maternity Leave, and Health & Safety。  new window
2.Prosser, W.、Keeton, W.(1984)。Law of Torts。  new window
3.Larson(1976)。Law of Workmen's Compensation。  new window
圖書論文
1.焦興鎧(1993)。美國聯邦最高法院與就業歧視問題。美國聯邦最高法院論文集。中央研究院歐美研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：628（臺灣：628，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67930041
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上