:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:義符啟動範式下家族大小和類別一致性對義符語義激活的影響
書刊名:心理學報
作者:章玉祉張積家
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(8)
頁次:1041-1052
主題關鍵詞:義符啟動家族大小類別一致性任務加工深度Semantic radical primingCategory consistencyNeighborhood sizeTask processing depth
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
采用義符啟動范式,考察不同加工深度任務中家族大小和類別一致性對義符語義激活的影響。結果發現:在詞匯判斷中,家族大小影響義符的語義激活,大家族義符的語義不容易激活,小家族義符的語義容易激活。在語義相關判斷中,類別一致性影響義符的語義激活,類別一致性高的義符的語義容易激活,并且在錯誤率上,這一影響受義符的家族大小調節。義符類別一致性影響義符家族效應的作用方向:當類別一致性低時,出現抑制的家族效應;當類別一致性高時,家族效應無影響或表現為促進作用。
Many Chinese compound characters consist of one semantic radical and one phonetic radical. The semantic radical is related with the meaning of the whole character. Characters sharing the same semantic radical constitute the semantic radical family. The difference induced by the size of the orthography family is neighborhood effect. The degree of semantic concentration of all Chinese characters formed by the same semantic radical is category consistency. Previous studies explored the semantic activation, neighborhood effect and category consistency effect of semantic radical under whole character priming paradigm. The limitations of previous studies include:(1) The whole character priming paradigm cannot separate the influence of the whole character.(2) Previous studies cannot compare lexical decision and semantic judgment directly, since the result of semantic judgments leads to the separation of "yes/no".(3) Previous studies examined the semantic activation, neighborhood effect and category consistency effect of the semantic radicals, but due to the limitations of the paradigm, they cannot integrate these influence factors. The present study intends to use the radical priming paradigm to investigate the effect of family size and category consistency on the semantic activation of semantic radicals in tasks of different processing depth.In experiment 1, we use the 2(Character type: transparent and opaque) × 2(priming condition: radical priming and **** priming) multi-factorial experiment design to validate the radical priming paradigm. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the reaction time of the two categories of Chinese characters under the **** priming condition. However, the reaction time of the semantic transparent Chinese characters was significantly shorter than that of the semantic opaque Chinese characters under the radical priming condition. The results indicate that the semantic radical’s meaning can be activated effectively. The radical priming paradigm is valid. In experiment 2 and experiment 3, the effects of family size and category consistency on the semantic activation of the semantic radicals are investigated in tasks of different processing depth. Experiment 2 used lexical decision task of a 2(character type: transparent and opaque) × 2(family size: large and small) × 2(category consistency: consistent and inconsistent) design. Experiment 3 used the semantic relevance judgment task of a 2(character type: S– —S– and S– —S+) × 2(family size: large and small) × 2(category consistency: consistent and inconsistent)design. Experiment 2 found the family size effect on the semantic activation of the semantic radicals. The meaning of semantic radicals of small families is easier to activate than that of semanticradicals of large families. Experiment 3 found the category consistency effect on semantic activation of semantic radicals. The meaning of semantic radicals of consistent category is easier to activate than that of semantic radicals of inconsistent category. Moreover, category consistency effect on semantic activation of radicals is regulated by family size in error rate. The whole study shows that the family size and category consistency can affect the semantic activation of semantic radicals, and the depth of processing will affect the different behaviors of the two factors. In the shallow processing task, we only found the family size effect on the semantic activation of the semantic radicals. While, in the deep processing task, we only found the family consistency effect on the semantic activation of the semantic radicals, and this effect is regulated to a certain extent by the family size of the semantic radicals. Moreover, we also found that the category consistency will affect the direction of family size effect of the semantic radicals.
期刊論文
1.Hsiao, Janet Hui-wen、Shillcock, Richard、Lavidor, Michal(2006)。A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition。Brain Research,1078(1),159-167。  new window
2.Williams, C.(2013)。Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners。Reading and Writing,26(2),293-315。  new window
3.Feldman, Laurie Beth、Siok, Witina Wai-ting(1997)。The Role of Component Function in Visual Recognition of Chinese Characters。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23(3),776-781。  new window
4.Feldman, Laurie B.、Siok, Witina W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters。Journal of Memory and Language,40(4),559-576。  new window
5.Hsiao, J. H.-W.、Shillcock, R.、Lavidor, M.(2007)。An examination of semantic radical combinability effects with lateralized cues in Chinese character recognition。Perception and Psychophysics,69(3),338-344。  new window
6.Hsiao, J. H. W.(2011)。Visual field differences in visual word recognition can emerge purely from perceptual learning: Evidence from modeling Chinese character pronunciation。Brain and Language,119(2),89-98。  new window
7.陳新葵、張積家(2008)。義符熟悉性對高頻形聲字詞匯通達的影響。心理學報,40,148-159。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉燕妮、舒華、軒月(2002)。漢字識別中形旁亞詞匯加工的發展研究。應用心理學,8,3-7。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chen, M. J.、Weekes, B. S.(20040600)。Effects of Semantic Radicals on Chinese Character Categorization and Character Decision。Chinese Journal of Psychology,46(2),181-196。  new window
10.張積家、陳新葵(2005)。漢字義符在漢語動作動詞意義認知中的作用。心理學報,37(4),434-441。  延伸查詢new window
11.張積家、彭聃齡(1993)。漢字詞特徵語義提取的實驗研究。心理學報,25(2),140-147。  延伸查詢new window
12.張積家、彭聃齡、張厚粲(1991)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,23(2),139-144。  延伸查詢new window
13.張積家、張厚粲、彭聃齡(1990)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,22(4),397-405。  延伸查詢new window
14.佘賢君、張必隱(1997)。形聲字心理詞典中義符和音符線索的作用。心理科學,2,142-145。  延伸查詢new window
15.孟祥芝、舒華、周曉林(2000)。漢字字形輸出過程中兒童的漢字結構意識。心理科學,23,260-264。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢怡、張逸瑋、畢鴻燕(2015)。漢字識別中的形旁家族效應。人類工效學,21(3),25-30。  延伸查詢new window
17.Su, I. F.、Weekes, B. S.(2007)。Effects of frequency and semantic radical combinability on reading in Chinese: An ERP study。Brain and Language,103(1/2),111-112。  new window
18.王娟、張積家(20161100)。義符的類別一致性和家族大小影響形聲字的語義加工。心理學報,2016(11),1390-1400。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.王娟、張積家、胡鴻志(2015)。小學生義符一致性意識的發展研究。心理科學,38,1136-1140。  延伸查詢new window
20.張積家、姜敏敏(2008)。形旁家族、聲旁家族和高頻同聲旁字對形聲字識別的影響。心理學報,40,947-960。  延伸查詢new window
21.張翔(2010)。現代漢字形聲字義符表義功能類型研究。青海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),32,132-136。  延伸查詢new window
22.趙婧、畢鴻燕、王艶梅(2011)。漢字聲旁家族效應與一致性效應的發展特點。人類工效學,17(1),1-4+14。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE