文章以近年來公布的藏文手抄本《大慈法王傳·如愿呈祥之陽》為主要史料,對大慈法王釋迦也失兩次進京的一些重要史實進行了新的考證。具體而言,對學界普遍認為釋迦也失第一次入朝于南京的觀點進行了辨析,認為此時明朝雖然沒有正式遷都,但政治中心已經北移,釋迦也失入朝的地點是北京而非南京。釋迦也失首次來京的駐錫地是元代舊寺海印寺,該寺與其宣德年間入京駐錫的大慈恩寺為同一座寺院。同時,文章將《大慈法王傳·如愿呈祥之陽》中的皇帝詔書和《明實錄》中的相關記載結合,證明釋迦也失第二次進京是在宣德二年應明宣宗的邀請,其最終抵達北京在宣德四年底;釋迦也失于宣德十年圓寂于北京大慈恩寺,并非如一些史料所載圓寂于返藏途中。

The article takes the Tibetan manuscript published in recent years,"Byams chen chos kyi rgyal po’i rnam thar’dod pa’i re skong dpal ster nyi ma"as the main historical data,and carried out a new research on some important historical facts about Shākyaye shes during his two visits to Beijing.The author argues that while the Ming court had not officially moved the capital to Beijing from Nanjing,the destination for Shākyaye shes’ s first visit to the Ming court was still not Nanjing,but Beijing where the Ming court had moved its political center northward to at that time,not Nanjing.The Haiyin Temple海印寺 where Shākyaye shes lived in Beijing during the first visit was the same temple called as the Daci’en Temple大慈恩寺 during his second visit to Beijing in the Xuande宣德 period.Moreover,mainly according to the imperial edicts in"Byams chen chos kyi rgyal po’i rnam thar’dod pa’i re skong dpal ster nyi ma"and the relevant records in the Ming Shilu 明實錄(Annalistic Veritable Records of Ming Dynasty),the paper proves that the second visit of Shākyaye shes to Beijing was a result of the invitation of Ming Xuanzong 明宣宗in second year of Xuande(1427).And he arrived in Beijing at the end of the fourth year of Xuande(1429).According to the these records,Shākyaye shes died in Daci’en Temple of Beijing’s in the tenth year of Xuande(1435).It is not correct that other records said that he had died on the way back to Tibet.